scholarly journals Flow Cytometric Analysis of Reverse Transcription-PCR Products: Quantification of p21WAF1/CIP1 and Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen mRNA

2000 ◽  
Vol 46 (8) ◽  
pp. 1057-1064 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niels Wedemeyer ◽  
Wolfgang Göhde ◽  
Thomas Pötter

Abstract Background: Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) is a powerful tool in clinical diagnostics for analyzing even small amounts of RNA, but sensitive assays for quantifying the amplification products are time-consuming or expensive. Here we describe a novel flow cytometry-based assay for rapid and sensitive determination of relative amounts of RT-PCR products. Methods: For flow cytometric quantification, PCR products were labeled with both digoxigenin and biotin during amplification. Subsequently, amplicons were simultaneously bound to anti-digoxigenin microparticles and fluorescently labeled with streptavidin-R-phycoerythrin. Fluorescence intensity per bead was determined by flow cytometry. To study this assay, we examined the expression of the p21WAF1/CIP1 gene and the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) gene in ultraviolet irradiation-exposed human keratinocytes lacking functional p53. Results: Fluorescence was linear with 60–10 000 pg of PCR product. As little as 0.4 fmol (40 pg of a 163-bp amplicon) of PCR product could be distinguished from background. The between-run CV of the fluorescent signal for 10 ng of p21 cDNA was 12% (n = 10). The fluorescence-template curve was sigmoidal. p21WAF1/CIP1 mRNA was decreased after ultraviolet irradiation of keratinocytes, whereas PCNA mRNA was markedly increased. Conclusion: The flow cytometric assay permits rapid (25 min) and reproducible identification of changes in mRNA abundance.

1996 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 219-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luisa Morell-Quadreny ◽  
M. Aurelia Gregori-Romero ◽  
Carmen Carda-Batalla ◽  
Antonio Llombart-Bosch

Eight conventional and six atypical oncocytomas in a series of 147 renal neoplasms were studied. Histopathologic findings revealed exclusively oncocytic cells, but cellular polymorphism was higher in the atypical tumors. Atypical oncocytomas presented focal necrosis, transcapsular invasion, or both. Electron microscopy showed similar findings in all cases. Immunohistochemistry of atypical oncocytomas had higher expression against proliferating cell nuclear antigen and more discontinuous immunostaining against laminin than typical ones. Flow cytometry revealed one or two aneuploid peaks in five typical and two atypical cases, although the latter had a higher proliferative fraction than typical oncocytomas. Cytogenetics of one typical oncocytoma showed a normal diploid karyotype; one atypical case resulted in a diploid karyotype but with endoreduplications in 13% of metaphases, and a second atypical oncocytoma became hypodiploid without structural anomalies. Based on the present results, the proposed distinction between conventional and atypical oncocytomas seems of limited clinical significance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document