scholarly journals P223Facing up the problem of no need for routine laboratory monitoring of new oral anticoagulants (direct thrombin inhibitors, direct factor Xa inhibitors)

2014 ◽  
Vol 103 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. S39.4-S40
Author(s):  
D Kuleshova ◽  
AG Obrezan
Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1884-1884 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne van Ryn ◽  
Monika Kink-Eiband ◽  
Norbert Hauel ◽  
Henning Priepke ◽  
Wolfgang Wienen

Abstract Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) have been shown to be very potent inhibitors of platelet function when platelets are activated with thrombin. This action does not occur by direct binding of the DTI to the platelet PAR-1/-4 receptor, but indirectly, by reducing thrombin concentrations and thereby reducing the interactions of thrombin with its receptor on the platelet. It was hypothesized that both thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors could inhibit platelet aggregation, if the stimulus to initiate aggregation was higher in the cascade than factor Xa, such as tissue factor. Thus, dabigatran, a DTI, and the direct factor Xa inhibitors, rivaroxaban and apixaban were tested. Free flowing whole blood (60 ml) was obtained from an antecubital vein using an 18 gauge needle from healthy human volunteers. Blood was collected in tubes containing 3.13% sodium citrate (1 in 10 dilution with whole blood). Blood was centrifuged at 200x g to obtain platelet rich plasma (PRP). Samples (300 μL PRP) were placed in a 6-channel aggregometer, equilibrated for 5 min at 37°C and calibrated with PPP from same individual (0–1 Volts). Photometric tracings were continuously digitally recorded over 5 min following the addition of tissue factor and curves were evaluated as AUC over this time interval. Each PRP sample was incubated with 2 mg/ml Pefabloc®FG (Gly-Pro-Arg-Pro) to prevent fibrin polymerisation, 5 mM CaCl2 and increasing concentrations of dabigatran or factor Xa inhibitor. Tissue factor stimulus (range, 5–27 μl of 10 ml Innovin solution) was tailored for each individual, so that the minimum concentration that resulted in maximum aggregation was used. As positive controls, aggregation was also performed after stimulating with ADP (10 μM), collagen (2 μg/ml), TRAP (20 μM) or ecarin (0.1 U/ml). All substances inhibited tissue factor-induced platelet aggregation in a concentration-dependent manner. Dabigatran was the most potent inhibitor of platelet aggregation among the substances tested, with an IC50 of 35 nM, rivaroxaban and then apixaban followed, with IC50s of 312 and 817 nM, respectively. All substances had no effect on platelet aggregation induced by ADP, collagen and TRAP. Dabigatran was a potent inhibitor of ecarin-induced platelet aggregation, while the factor Xa inhibitors had no effect, as expected from their mechanism of action. Thus, these studies demonstrate that both direct thrombin inhibitors (by inhibiting thrombin) and direct factor Xa inhibitors (by preventing thrombin generation) indirectly inhibit platelet aggregation, though dabigatran was more potent than rivaroxaban and apixaban under these experimental conditions. Thus, these substances may not only be effective in venous/stasis thrombotic episodes where fibrin formation plays an important role, but may also be effective in more platelet dominant, arterial thrombosis settings.


2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (01) ◽  
pp. 21-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Harbrecht

SummaryVitamin-K-antagonists (VKA) and heparins have been complementary anticoagulants for prevention and treatment of thrombosis for almost 70 years. In contrast to heparins, VKA have not been modified pharmacologically, however treatment surveillance has improved by introducing INR and self-monitoring/management. Disclosure of the molecular basis of interaction with VKORC1, the target enzyme of VKA, has helped to better understand coumarin sensitivity and resistance. New oral anticoagulants have now been approved and stimulated expectations in patients and physicians to get rid of the burdening frequent controls of VKA without loss of efficacy and safety.This review will summarize the development and profile of the new substances. Main difference compared to VKA is their direct mode of action against one clotting factor which is factor IIa in dabigatran and factor Xa in rivaroxaban and other “xabanes” currently under intensive investigation. Half lifes of the new anticoagulants are much shorter than that of the mainly used coumarins (phenprocoumon, warfarin), making “anticoagulation bridging” unnecessary before surgery. Therapeutic width of direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors is broader and they are given at fixed doses. Clinical studies in thromboprophylaxis, thromboembolism and atrial fibrillation indicate at least non-inferiority or even superior efficacy compared with enoxaparin and VKA at comparable safety outcomes. Limitations of the new substances may arise from gastrointestinal side effects, mode of metabolism and route of elimination. Specific antidots are not available for none of them.Undoubtedly, the new oral anticoagulants are very promising. But, although thousands of study patients already have been treated, there are questions to be answered such as treatment adherence in absence of monitoring, safety and efficacy in risk patients, dosage adjustment and interactions with other drugs, before conclusions can be drawn towards their potential to replace VKA.


Hematology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-133
Author(s):  
Karen A. Moser ◽  
Kristi J. Smock

Abstract Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are a group of direct coagulation factor inhibitors including both direct thrombin inhibitors and direct factor Xa inhibitors. These medications may cause hemostasis assay interference by falsely increasing or decreasing measured values, depending on the analyte. Considering the potential for DOAC interference in a variety of hemostasis assays is essential to avoid erroneous interpretation of results. Preanalytic strategies to avoid DOAC interference include selecting alternatives to clot-based hemostasis assays in patients taking DOACs when possible and sample collection timed when the patient is off anticoagulant therapy or at the expected drug trough. Clinical laboratories may also provide educational materials that clearly describe possible interferences from DOAC, develop testing algorithms to aid in detection of DOAC in submitted samples, use DOAC-neutralizing agents to remove DOACs before continuing with testing, and write interpretive comments that explain the effects of DOAC interference in hemostasis tests. Using a combination of the described strategies will aid physicians and laboratorians in correctly interpreting hemostasis and thrombosis laboratory tests in the presence of DOACs.


Author(s):  
Н.А. Воробьева ◽  
Е.Ю. Мельничук ◽  
А.И. Воробьева

Введение. Для пролонгированной профилактики тромбозов после операций, при фибрилляции предсердий, терапии тромбозов глубоких вен и/или тромбоэмболии легочной артерии широко используются прямые пероральные антикоагулянтные препараты (ПОАК). Считается, что ПОАК лишены недостатков, присущих антагонистам витамина К (АВК) и обладают предсказуемыми фармакокинетическими и фармакодинамическими эффектами и следовательно не требуют рутинного лабораторного контроля для коррекции и подбора дозы препарата. Отдельного внимания, на наш взгляд, заслуживает вопрос приверженности к терапии ПОАК. Цель исследования: оценка приверженности к терапии прямыми пероральными ингибиторами фактора Ха путем определения концентрации ПОАК в плазме крови пациентов. Материалы и методы. Выполнено проспективное клинико-лабораторное исследование, включены 50 пациентов с продленной антитромботической терапией ПОАК. Для оценки приверженности к терапии проведено определение пиковой концентрации прямых ингибиторов фактора Ха хромогенным методом. Результаты. До 10% пациентов в реальной клинической практике не принимали назначенную антитромботическую терапию и скрыли этот факт от врача. Таким образом, с помощью определения концентрации прямых ингибиторов фактора Ха хромогенным методом можно выявить отсутствие приверженности к терапии ПОАК. Заключение. Для определения приверженности к антикоагулянтной терапии прямыми ингибиторами фактора Ха возможно использование метода оценки концентрации ПОАК в плазме крови, что позволяет оценить приверженность пациента к данному виду терапии и, как следствие, эффективность и безопасность продленной антитромботической терапии. Background. For prolonged prophylaxis of thrombosis after surgery, of atrial fibrillation, therapy of deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used. It is believed that DOACs lack the deficiencies inherent in antagonists of vitamin K (AVK), have predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects, and therefore do notrequire routine laboratory monitoring to adjust and select the dose of the drug. We pay special attention to the issue of adherence to DOACs therapy. Objectives: to assess compliance to therapy with direct oral factor Xa inhibitors by determining plasma DOACs concentration. Patients/Methods. A prospective clinical and laboratory study was performed, 50 patients with prolonged antithrombotic therapy by DOACs were included. To assess compliance to therapy, the peak concentration of direct factor Xa inhibitors was determined by the chromogenic method. Results. In real clinical practice up to 10% of patients did not take the prescribed antithrombotic therapy and hid this fact from the doctor. Thus, by determining the concentration of direct factor Xa inhibitors by the chromogenic method, it is possible to identify a lack of compliance to therapy. Conclusions. Determination of plasma DOACs concentration allows assessing the patient’s adherence to anticoagulant therapy with direct factor Xa inhibitors and the efficacy and safety of prolonged antithrombotic therapy.


2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1078-1079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Amiral ◽  
Céline Guinet ◽  
Elisabeth Perzborn ◽  
François Depasse ◽  
Meyer Michel Samama

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (04) ◽  
pp. 372-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. A. Viniou ◽  
P. Diamantopoulos ◽  
J. Barbetseas ◽  
E. A. Sanidas

SummaryHeparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic syndrome initiated by platelet-activating auto-antibodies with potentially devastating complications. Once the diagnosis of HIT is suspected, discontinuation of heparin and treatment with an alternative anticoagulant are mandatory. While established drugs for HIT are no longer available, parenteral factor Xa inhibitors, thrombin inhibitors and perhaps the direct oral anticoagulants provide additional treatment options. The aim of this review was to highlight the current clinical aspects regarding HIT focusing on the role of novel medications.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document