PS02.086: ENDOSCOPIC RESPONSE EVALUATION OF NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY CAN PREDICT PATHOLOGICAL RESPONSE AND SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 145-145
Author(s):  
Yohei Nagai ◽  
Naoya Yoshida ◽  
Yoshifumi Baba ◽  
Hideo Baba

Abstract Background To investigate the association between endoscopic response evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with pathological response and survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with the aid of a prospectively entered database. One hundred and eleven consecutive patients with ESCC who underwent radical esophagectomy after NAC were included. All patients were divided into two groups according to endoscopic response after NAC: endoscopic non-responders in whom NAC was poorly or moderately effective, and endoscopic responders in whom NAC was highly effective or completely effective. The clinical response after NAC was evaluated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Results The pretreatment clinical stage was IB in 5 patients (5%), II in 18 (16%), III in 72 (65%), and IV in 16 (14%). All patients received two courses of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of docetaxel, cisplatin (CDDP), and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; the DCF regimen) in 82 patients (74%), and 5-FU and CDDP (FP) in 29 (26%). All patients underwent radical esophagectomy with 2- or 3-field lymph node dissection. The postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 0.9% and 26%, respectively. Pathological stage (ypStage) was 0 in 1 patient (1%), I in 16 (14%), II in 31 (28%), III in 48 (43%), and IV in 15 (13%). Twenty-two patients (20%) were pathological responders, and this group of patients had better overall survival than pathological non-responders (P = 0.02). Pathological response was significantly correlated with tumor depth (cT) (P < 0.01), protruding type of tumor (P = 0.01) before NAC, and clinical response (P < 0.01) and endoscopic response (P < 0.01) after NAC. Of these clinical factors, clinical response and endoscopic response were significantly correlated with prognosis. Conclusion Endoscopic response after NAC can predict the pathological response and prognosis of patients who received NAC followed by surgery. Endoscopic findings are clinically significant to assess the response of NAC in patients with ESCC. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 149-149
Author(s):  
Yasuyoshi Sato ◽  
Hiroharu Yamashita ◽  
Yasuhiro Okumura ◽  
Kotaro Wakamatsu ◽  
Masato Nishida ◽  
...  

Abstract Background For patients with stage II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil followed by surgery has been regarded as a standard treatment in Japan based on the result of Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG9907). However, the survival outcome of this doublet chemotherapy has been still unsatisfactory especially in stage III patients. Triplet-regimen, consisting of docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF), showed good responses and survivals in some previous phase II studies, and therefore neoadjuvant DCF seems promising for more advanced stage. We adopted neoadjuvant DCF chemotherapy for patients with advanced ESCC. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 48 patients with ESCC treated with DCF as neoadjuvant chemotherapy from January 2013 to October 2017 in our hospital. All patients were in clinical T3–4a/N1–2/M0 or T1b-2 with bulky lymph metastasis based on the TNM classification 7th edition. DCF regimen consisted of i.v. docetaxel (60–70 mg/m2) on day 1 and cisplatin (60–70 mg/m2) on day 1, and continuous infusion of fluorouracil (600–700 mg/m2) on days 1–5. This regimen was repeated every 4 weeks. Results Forty-six patients (96%) completed 2 cycles of DCF. According to revised RECIST guideline, response rate was 29% (CR, 2; PR, 12; SD, 14; PD, 8; Non-CR/non-PD, 12). Forty-two patients except PD underwent surgery; R0 resection was achieved in 40 patients. Among 34 patients observed for more than 1 year after initial treatment, 1 year survival rate and overall survival time were 72.7% [95%CI: 49.1–86.7] and 20.1 months [95%CI: 9.4–30.6] in SD, Non-CR/non-PD and PD patients, while no patients died at the 1 year and did not reach median survival in CR and PR group (P = 0.001). Conclusion Survival of advanced ESCC patients was strongly associated with the clinical response to neoadjuvant DCF. It might be an indicator to select good candidates for surgical therapy. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document