PS02.166: OESOPHAGO-GASTRIC CANCER PATIENTS OPERATED ON IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR SURVIVE LONGER THAN NHS PATIENTS

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 168-169
Author(s):  
Abraham Botha ◽  
S Heymans ◽  
William Knight ◽  
Rebecca Bott ◽  
Nick Maisey ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In the UK, national directives have resulted in centralisation of oesophago-gastric cancer in large National Health Service (NHS) centres. NHS cancer centres have treatment pathway targets of 30 and 60 days to complete staging and start treatment. We have treated patients with oesophago-gastric cancer both in the NHS and private sector. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the treatment and outcome was different for patients treated in the private sector. Methods Data was collected prospectively of consecutive oesophago-gastrectomies for OGJ cancer performed by a single surgeon from 2003–2013. After diagnosis all cases were discussed in a multi-disciplinary meeting. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy was offered to all patients deemed to have N1 or T3 disease according to MAGIC and OEO5 study protocols. Patients in these stage groups who declined neo-adjuvant chemotherapy were offered adjuvant chemotherapy or chemo-radiation. During the first 2 years oesophago-gastrectomy was performed by open surgery, where-after laparoscopic and thoracoscopic techniques were introduced. Data analysis was by logistic regression using SPSS software. Results 204 resections for OGJ cancer were performed during. The average age was 63 years (range 41–82), 85% had adenocarcinoma, and 78% of patients received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. The pathological staging was pN1 64%, pT0 5%, pT1 17%, pT2 32%, pT3 42%, pT4 3%. The median hospital stay was 14 days (range 6–210), and the in-hospital mortality was 2.5%. 40 patients had their treatment in private hospitals. There was no difference in the demographics, histology, tumour stage, percentage receiving chemotherapy, type of chemotherapy or surgery between private and NHS patients. Private patients completed their staging tests within 9 days (range 126) of endoscopy and started definitive treatment within 10 days (range 2–59) of the last staging test. 26 of the 40 patients (65%) operated on in the private sector survived 5 years which was more than the 39% of NHS patients who survived 5 years (P = 0.0084). Conclusion Treatment for oesophago-gastric cancer is evolving. Patients with oesophago-gastric cancer treated in the private sector have better long-term survival than NHS patients which might be related to their shorter treatment pathway. Further studies will elucidate the changes in treatment required to improve survival for all UK patients with oesophago-gastric cancer. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-li Shen ◽  
Jun Lu ◽  
Jia Lin ◽  
Bin-bin Xu ◽  
Zhen Xue ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The potential additive influence of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) on prognosis of patients with stage II/III gastric cancer (GC) who experienced complications after radical surgery is unclear.Methods The whole group was divided into a postoperative complication (PC) group and a postoperative non-complication (NPC) group, and the overall survival (OS) rate, recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate and recurrence rate were compared between the two groups of patients. Results A total of 1563 patients between January 2010 and December 2015 in our center were included in this analysis. There were 268 patients (17.14%) in the PC group and 1295 patients (82.86%) in the NPC group. The 5-year OS rate of the PC group was 55.2%, the NPC group was 63.3%; and the 5-year RFS rate of the PC group was 53.7%, the non-PC group was 58.8%. Recurrence patterns showed no significant difference between the two group (all p>0.05). Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) significantly improved the OS and RFS rates of patients with and without PCs (both p<0.05), and it showed no significant difference between the PC group and the NPC group who received AC (both p> 0.05). Stratified analysis showed that AC only improve the OS or RFS rates of stage III patients (both p<0.05). Further stratified analysis of the time interval (TI) from operation to initiation of AC in the PC group showed that a TI after 6 weeks (≥6eeks) improved only the OS and RFS rates of stage III patients, while when a TI within 6 weeks (<6weeks), a benefit was observed in stage II and III patients (both p<0.05).Conclusion AC can abolish the negative effect of PCs on the long-term survival of patients with stage III GC; for stage II patients, the above offset effect is affected by the TI. Delaying AC initiation after 6 weeks may not improve the survival of patients experienced stage II GC with complications.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (02) ◽  
pp. 070-073
Author(s):  
Kalita Deepjyoti ◽  
Srinivas Bannoth ◽  
Joydeep Purkayastha ◽  
Bibhuti B. Borthakur ◽  
Abhijit Talukdar ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aim Carcinoma of the stomach is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Surgery for gastric cancer in the form of total or distal gastrectomy is definitive treatment. Feeding jejunostomy (FJ) though improves postoperative nutritional status and outcome, it is not devoid of its complications. In this study, we present the outcomes of nasojejunal (NJ) feeding and FJ and complications associated with them. Materials and Methods It is both retrospective and prospective observational study in patients with gastric cancer undergoing surgery. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent FJ and those who underwent NJ route of feeding placed intraoperatively. Results A total of 279 patients of gastric cancer who underwent surgery were taken into study, of which, 165 were male and 114 females. FJ was done in 42 and NJ in 237 patients, respectively. Gastrectomy + NJ was done in 128 patients, gastrectomy + FJ in 27 patients, gastrojejunostomy + NJ in 109 patients, and FJ in 15 patients. We had three patients of bile leaks in FJ group, of which one patient had intraperitoneal leak who needed re-exploration; rest of the two had peri-FJ external leaks, who were managed conservatively. Most of the complications of NJ group were minor. Conclusion Our study of 279 patients in gastric cancer has shown that FJ is sometimes associated with major complications with increased hospital stay and morbidity when compared with NJ tube feeding without any difference in nutritional outcomes. Hence, NJ route of postoperative enteral nutrition can be considered as an alternative to FJ wherever feasible in view of its technical safety and minor complications and morbidity.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Costantino Voglino ◽  
Giulio Di Mare ◽  
Francesco Ferrara ◽  
Lorenzo De Franco ◽  
Franco Roviello ◽  
...  

Introduction. The impact of preoperative BMI on surgical outcomes and long-term survival of gastric cancer patients was investigated in various reports with contrasting results.Materials & Methods. A total of 378 patients who underwent a surgical resection for primary gastric cancer between 1994 and 2011 were retrospectively studied. Patients were stratified according to BMI into a normal group (<25, group A), an overweight group (25–30, group B), and an obesity group (≥30, group C). These 3 groups were compared according to clinical-pathological characteristics, surgical treatment, and long-term survival.Results. No significant correlations between BMI and TNM (2010), UICC stage (2010), Lauren’s histological type, surgical results, lymph node dissection, and postoperative morbidity and mortality were observed. Factors related to higher BMI were male genderP<0.05, diabetesP<0.001, and serum blood proteinsP<0.01. A trend to fewer lymph nodes retrieved during gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy in overweight patients (B and C groups) was observed, although not statistically significant. There was no difference in overall survival or disease-specific survival between the three groups.Conclusion. According to our data, BMI should not be considered a significant predictor of postoperative complications or long-term result in gastric cancer patients.


1994 ◽  
pp. 411-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Nakajima ◽  
S. Ishihara ◽  
H. Motohashi ◽  
Y. Kitamura ◽  
Y. Nakajima ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Reid ◽  
Harsh A. Kanhere ◽  
Peter J. Hewett ◽  
Timothy J. Price ◽  
Guy J. Maddern ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Gastric cancer remains one of the most fatal cancers, despite an intensive treatment regime of chemotherapy–surgery–chemotherapy. Peritoneal metastatic disease is commonly diagnosed post treatment regime and once established, patients are likely to die in 3–9 months. Systemic chemotherapy does not increase survival for these patients due to the poor vascularisation of this area. We are proposing the addition of pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) to the treatment regime for curative patients as a preventive measure to reduce the risk of peritoneal metastases occurring. Methods This is a prospective, single centre, non-randomised, open-label pilot trial evaluating the addition of PIPAC to the standard multimodal treatment pathway. Patients will undergo standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy with four cycles of fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel (FLOT), then PIPAC, followed by gastrectomy. Four cycles of FLOT will be administered post-surgery. Primary outcome is safety and feasibility, assessed by perioperative morbidity and possible interruptions of the standard multimodal treatment pathway.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document