Incidence and risk factors for esophageal cancer following achalasia treatment: national population-based case-control study

ObjectivesTo determine the incidence of and risk factors for neonatal unit admission, intrapartum stillbirth or neonatal death without admission, and describe outcomes, in babies born in an alongside midwifery unit (AMU).DesignNational population-based case-control study.MethodWe used the UK Midwifery Study System to identify and collect data about 1041 women who gave birth in AMUs, March 2017 to February 2018, whose babies were admitted to a neonatal unit or died (cases) and 1984 controls from the same AMUs. We used multivariable logistic regression, generating adjusted OR (aOR) with 95% CIs, to investigate maternal and intrapartum factors associated with neonatal admission or mortality.ResultsThe incidence of neonatal admission or mortality following birth in an AMU was 1.2%, comprising neonatal admission (1.2%) and mortality (0.01%). White ‘other’ ethnicity (aOR=1.28; 95% CI=1.01 to 1.63); nulliparity (aOR=2.09; 95% CI=1.78 to 2.45); ≥2 previous pregnancies ≥24 weeks’ gestation (aOR=1.38; 95% CI=1.10 to 1.74); male sex (aOR=1.46; 95% CI=1.23 to 1.75); maternal pregnancy problem (aOR=1.40; 95% CI=1.03 to 1.90); prolonged (aOR=1.42; 95% CI=1.01 to 2.01) or unrecorded (aOR=1.38; 95% CI=1.05 to 1.81) second stage duration; opiate use (aOR=1.31; 95% CI=1.02 to 1.68); shoulder dystocia (aOR=5.06; 95% CI=3.00 to 8.52); birth weight <2500 g (aOR=4.12; 95% CI=1.97 to 8.60), 4000–4999 g (aOR=1.64; 95% CI=1.25 to 2.14) and ≥4500 g (aOR=2.10; 95% CI=1.17 to 3.76), were independently associated with neonatal admission or mortality. Among babies admitted (n=1038), 18% received intensive care. Nine babies died, six following neonatal admission. Sepsis (52%) and respiratory distress (42%) were the most common discharge diagnoses.ConclusionsThe results of this study are in line with other evidence on risk factors for neonatal admission, and reassuring in terms of the quality and safety of care in AMUs.

Download Full-text

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Risk factors for intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a population-based case-control study.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature ◽

10.3410/f.1094918.549869 ◽

2007 ◽

Author(s):

Cynthia Ko

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Risk Factors ◽

Case Control Study ◽

The United States ◽

Population Based ◽

Case Control ◽

Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma ◽

Control Study

Download Full-text

Faculty Opinions recommendation of Bowel disturbances are the most important risk factors for late onset fecal incontinence: a population-based case-control study in women.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature ◽

10.3410/f.4909957.4840055 ◽

2010 ◽

Author(s):

Klaus Bielefeldt

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Fecal Incontinence ◽

Case Control Study ◽

Late Onset ◽

Population Based ◽

Case Control ◽

Control Study

Download Full-text

Association between infection with Campylobacter species, poor oral health and environmental risk factors on esophageal cancer: a hospital-based case–control study in Thailand

European Journal of Medical Research ◽

10.1186/s40001-021-00561-3 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 26 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Arisara Poosari ◽

Thitima Nutravong ◽

Prakasit Sa-ngiamwibool ◽

Wises Namwat ◽

Supaporn Chatrchaiwiwatana ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Esophageal Cancer ◽

Oral Hygiene ◽

Case Control Study ◽

Significant Risk ◽

Case Control ◽

Poor Oral Hygiene ◽

History Of ◽

Control Study ◽

History Of Cancer

Abstract Background Previous studies have shown the association between Campylobacter species infection and that environmental factors, poor oral hygiene in particular, are linked to an increased risk of esophageal cancer (EC). However, no study has reported on these factors in Thailand. Thus, this study’s objective was to evaluate the impact of the relationship between Campylobacter infection and environmental factors on EC incidence in the population of Thailand. Methods Data from a case–control study were collected from 105 newly diagnosed EC cases and 105 controls recruited from 2007 to 2017. Infection with Campylobacter spp. was detected in the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue of EC taken from gastroesophageal biopsy specimens obtained from the participants, and evaluated using TaqMan® real-time PCR. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and perform data analysis. Results Smoking, alcohol use, a family history of cancer, history of gastroesophageal reflux disease, poor oral hygiene and Campylobacter spp. infection were shown to be significant risk factors for EC (p < 0.05). The combination of poor oral hygiene and infection with Campylobacter spp. constituted significant risk for EC (p < 0.001). In addition, the risk of EC in subjects co-infected with C. rectus and C. concisus that practiced poor oral hygiene was even higher and was significant (ORadj = 4.7; 95% CI 2.41–9.98; p = 0.003). Conclusions In Thailand, the major risk factors for EC are smoking status, alcohol drinking, family history of cancer, GERD, poor oral hygiene and Campylobacter spp. infection. This study found Campylobacter spp. prevalence to be associated with EC and appears to be enhanced by poor oral hygiene, suggesting that a combination of poor oral hygiene and Campylobacter species infection may together act as an important etiological risk factor for EC.

Download Full-text