Ticagrelor pretreatment in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Graca Santos ◽  
R Ribeiro Carvalho ◽  
S Fernandes ◽  
F Montenegro Sa ◽  
C Ruivo ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Dual antiplatelet therapy is recommended in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTACS), regardless of the treatment strategy (invasive vs. conservative). Although prasugrel pretreatment is not recommended due to safety concerns, the timing of ticagrelor administration is still debated. Aim To investigate the clinical effects of ticagrelor pretreatment in NSTACS patients (pts) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods Retrospective multicentre study of 5213 NSTACS pts who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) up to 72 hours following hospital admission, between January 2013 and December 2018. Patients with prior chronic exposure to oral antithrombotics (except acetylsalicylic acid), not acutely managed with ticagrelor, and those with missing data were excluded. A total of 415 pts were included for analysis, 256 (61.6%) received ticagrelor pretreatment (Group 1) and 159 (38.3%) were treated with ticagrelor only in the catheterization laboratory (Group 2). The primary safety endpoint was a composite of in-hospital major bleeding, need for red blood cell transfusion or haemoglobin drop ≥2g/dL and the secondary endpoint of periprocedural events was a composite of PCI failure, bailout use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors and in-hospital re-infarction. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the correlates of ticagrelor pretreatment and each of the endpoints. One-year follow up was achieved in 103 pts (24.8%). Results Overall, mean age was 62±11 years and 20.7% were female. Crude event rates did not differ regarding primary endpoint (16.5 vs 11.5%; p=0.17), while secondary endpoint was more frequent among group 2 (2.1% vs 7.1%; p=0.01). Multivariate analysis showed no association between the timing of ticagrelor administration and the primary safety endpoint, while periprocedural events were less frequent in pretreated pts (Figure 1A). At the Kaplan-Meier analysis, one-year cumulative event-free (all-cause death, stroke or re-infarction) rates did not differ (Figure 1B). Conclusion In this cohort of NSTACS pts undergoing PCI in the first 72 hours after hospital admission, ticagrelor pretreatment was associated with less periprocedural events with no compromise regarding safety, compared to treatment in the catheterization laboratory. Additional data is still needed to clarify these findings. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Sida Jia ◽  
Ce Zhang ◽  
Yue Liu ◽  
Deshan Yuan ◽  
Xueyan Zhao ◽  
...  

Objective. We aim to evaluate the long-term prognosis of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients with high-risk coronary anatomy (HRCA). Background. Coronary disease severity is important for therapeutic decision-making and prognostication among patients presenting with NSTE-ACS. However, long-term outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with HRCA is still unknown. Method. NSTE-ACS patients undergoing PCI in Fuwai Hospital in 2013 were prospectively enrolled and subsequently divided into HRCA and low-risk coronary anatomy (LRCA) groups according to whether angiography complies with the HRCA definition. HRCA was defined as left main disease >50%, proximal LAD lesion >70%, or 2- to 3- vessel disease involving the LAD. Prognosis impact on 2-year and 5-year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) is analyzed. Results. Out of 4,984 enrolled patients with NSTE-ACS, 3,752 patients belonged to the HRCA group, while 1,232 patients belonged to the LRCA group. Compared with the LRCA group, patients in the HRCA group had worse baseline characteristics including higher age, more comorbidities, and worse angiographic findings. Patients in the HRCA group had higher incidence of unplanned revascularization (2 years: 9.7% vs. 5.1%, p<0.001; 5 years: 15.4% vs. 10.3%, p<0.001), 2-year MACCE (13.1% vs. 8.8%, p<0.001), and 5-year death/MI/revascularization/stroke (23.0% vs. 18.4%, p=0.001). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed similar results. After adjusting for confounding factors, HRCA is independently associated with higher risk of revascularization (2 years: HR = 1.636, 95% CI: 1.225–2.186; 5 years: HR = 1.460, 95% CI: 1.186–1.798), 2-year MACCE (HR = 1.275, 95% CI = 1.019–1.596) and 5-year death/MI/revascularization/stroke (HR = 1.183, 95% CI: 1.010–1.385). Conclusion. In our large cohort of Chinese patients, HRCA is an independent risk factor for long-term unplanned revascularization and MACCE.


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 631-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Iannaccone ◽  
Fabrizio D’Ascenzo ◽  
Paolo Vadalà ◽  
Stephen B Wilton ◽  
Patrizia Noussan ◽  
...  

Background: The prevalence and outcome of patients with cancer that experience acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have to be determined. Methods and results: The BleeMACS project is a multicentre observational registry enrolling patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention worldwide in 15 hospitals. The primary endpoint was a composite event of death and re-infarction after one year of follow-up. Bleedings were the secondary endpoint. 15,401 patients were enrolled, 926 (6.4%) in the cancer group and 14,475 (93.6%) in the group of patients without cancer. Patients with cancer were older (70.8±10.3 vs. 62.8±12.1 years, P<0.001) with more severe comorbidities and presented more frequently with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared with patients without cancer. After one year, patients with cancer more often experienced the composite endpoint (15.2% vs. 5.3%, P<0.001) and bleedings (6.5% vs. 3%, P<0.001). At multiple regression analysis the presence of cancer was the strongest independent predictor for the primary endpoint (hazard ratio (HR) 2.1, 1.8–2.5, P<0.001) and bleedings (HR 1.5, 1.1–2.1, P=0.015). Despite patients with cancer generally being undertreated, beta-blockers (relative risk (RR) 0.6, 0.4–0.9, P=0.05), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (RR 0.5, 0.3–0.8, P=0.02), statins (RR 0.3, 0.2–0.5, P<0.001) and dual antiplatelet therapy (RR 0.5, 0.3–0.9, P=0.05) were shown to be protective factors, while proton pump inhibitors (RR 1, 0.6–1.5, P=0.9) were neutral. Conclusion: Cancer has a non-negligible prevalence in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, with a major risk of cardiovascular events and bleedings. Moreover, these patients are often undertreated from clinical despite medical therapy seems to be protective. Registration:The BleeMACS project (NCT02466854).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document