Randomised controlled trial to investigate optimal antithrombotic therapy in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a study protocol of the OPTIMA-AF trial

IntroductionThe optimal antithrombotic strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is uncertain. For patients with non-AF, many trials are now evaluating short 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy. In patients with AF undergoing PCI, in contrast, short dual therapy (P2Y12 inhibitor +direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)) has not yet been evaluated.Methods and analysisThe OPTIMA-AF trial (OPTIMAl antiplatelet therapy in combination with direct oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting stent) is an investigator-initiated, open-label, nationwide, multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial. The primary objective is to compare the efficacy and safety of short dual therapy (1-month DOAC +P2Y12 inhibitor followed by DOAC monotherapy) against long dual therapy (12-month DOAC +P2Y12 inhibitor followed by DOAC monotherapy) in the treatment of AF subjects undergoing PCI. The primary efficacy endpoint is a composite of death or thromboembolic events (myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, stroke or systemic embolism) at 365 days; and the primary safety endpoint is bleeding (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding) at 365 days. This trial is intended to show the non-inferiority of short dual therapy versus long dual therapy in terms of the primary efficacy endpoint and show superiority in terms of the primary safety endpoint. A total of 1090 subjects will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio at approximately 60 sites.Ethics and disseminationThis study received approval from the Certified Review Board of Osaka University (a certified research ethics committee by the Japanese Clinical Research Act). The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.Trial registration numberJapan Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCTs051190053; Pre-results.

Diversion-p64: results from an international, prospective, multicenter, single-arm post-market study to assess the safety and effectiveness of the p64 flow modulation device

BackgroundThe use of flow diversion to treat intracranial aneurysms has increased in recent years.ObjectiveTo assess the safety and angiographic efficacy of the p64 flow modulation device.MethodsDiversion-p64 is an international, prospective, multicenter, single-arm, study conducted at 26 centers. The p64 flow modulation device was used to treat anterior circulation aneurysms between December 2015 and January 2019. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of major stroke or neurologic death at 3–6 months, with the primary efficacy endpoint being complete aneurysm occlusion (Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification 1) on follow-up angiography.ResultsA total of 420 patients met the eligibility criteria and underwent treatment with the p64 flow modulation device (mean age 55±12.0 years, 86.2% female). Mean aneurysm dome width was 6.99±5.28 mm and neck width 4.47±2.28 mm. Mean number of devices implanted per patient was 1.06±0.47, with adjunctive coiling performed in 14.0% of the cases. At the second angiographic follow-up (mean 375±73 days), available for 343 patients (81.7%), complete aneurysm occlusion was seen in 287 (83.7%) patients. Safety data were available for 413 patients (98.3%) at the first follow-up (mean 145±43 days) with a composite morbidity/mortality rate of 2.42% (n=10).ConclusionsDiversion-p64 is the largest prospective study using the p64 flow modulation device. The results of this study demonstrate that the device has a high efficacy and carries a low rate of mortality and permanent morbidity.

Endovascular renal sympathetic denervation to improve heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: the IMPROVE-HF-I study

Introduction The aim of the present study was to assess the safety and efficacy of renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods We randomly assigned 50 patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% and NYHA class ≥ II, in a 1:1 ratio, to either RDN and optimal medical therapy (OMT) or OMT alone. The primary safety endpoint was the occurrence of a combined endpoint of cardiovascular death, rehospitalisation for heart failure, and acute kidney injury at 6 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in iodine-123 meta-iodobenzylguanidine (123I‑MIBG) heart-to-mediastinum ratio (HMR) at 6 months. Results Mean age was 60 ± 9 years, 86% was male and mean LVEF was 33 ± 8%. At 6 months, the primary safety endpoint occurred in 8.3% vs 8.0% in the RDN and OMT groups, respectively (p = 0.97). At 6 months, the mean change in late HMR was −0.02 (95% CI: −0.08 to 0.12) in the RDN group, versus −0.02 (95% CI: −0.09 to 0.12) in the OMT group (p = 0.95) whereas the mean change in washout rate was 2.34 (95% CI: −6.35 to 1.67) in the RDN group versus −2.59 (95% CI: −1.61 to 6.79) in the OMT group (p-value 0.09). Conclusion RDN with the Vessix system in patients with HFrEF was safe, but did not result in significant changes in cardiac sympathetic nerve activity at 6 months as measured using 123I‑MIBG.

Prospective application of a risks-adjusted antithrombotic protocol in elderly patients treated with the last generation of everolimus-eluting stents. The SIERRA-75 (EPIC-05) registry

Background Elderly patients show a higher incidence of ischemic and bleeding events after PCI. Purpose We sought to investigate clinical outcomes in elderly patients revascularized with last generation everolimus-eluting stent (EES) treated with antithrombotic strategies guided by bleeding and ischemic risks. Methods Prospective multicenter registry including patients over 75 years revascularized with EES and subsequent antithrombotic therapy guided according to a protocol based on clinical presentation, PCI complexity and the PRECISE DAPT score. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and definitive/probable stent thrombosis and the primary efficacy endpoint was TLR. An historical matched group of patients treated with current drug eluting stents other than EES was used as control. Results Finally, 1,064 patients were included, 80.8±4.2 years, 36.6% women, 72% ACS and 53.6% complex PCI. Primary safety endpoint was met in 6.2% and primary efficacy endpoint in 1.5%. Bleeding BARC 2–5 was reported in 7.8% and definite or probable stent thrombosis in 1.3%. The multivariable adjusted model showed no significant association of the prescribed short/long therapies with any endpoint. No stent thrombosis were reported in the subgroup with shorter DAPT duration. As compared to control group, bleeding BARC 2–5 was significantly lower in SIERRA-75 group (7.4% vs 10.2%, p=0.04) as well as the composite of MACE and bleeding (14.3% vs 18.5%, p=0.02). Conclusions In elderly population the use of last generation EES along with a predefined risks-adjusted antithrombotic regimen seems to be associated with an improved prognosis in terms of ischemic and bleeding outcomes. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Abbott Laboratories

Multi-centric European post-market follow-up study of the Neuroform Atlas Stent System: primary results

BackgroundFew prospective series have described the safety and effectiveness of the Neuroform Atlas Stent System. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of the device in patients treated for unruptured aneurysm.MethodsATLAS EU PMCF is a consecutive, prospective, multicentric study that included patients with unruptured saccular aneurysm of all sizes. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 3–6 months and 12–16 months with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) or MRI imaging follow-up as per the site standard of care. The primary efficacy endpoint was adequate aneurysm occlusion (Raymond Roy occlusion grade I and II) on 12 month angiography. The primary safety endpoint was any major stroke or ipsilateral stroke or neurological death within 12 months.ResultsOf the 106 patients consented, 105 were treated with at least one Neuroform Atlas stent. There was a failed implantation attempt in 1 patient, 85 patients received lateral stenting, and 19 patients received Y-stenting. Mean aneurysm neck size was 4.2 mm (range 1.9–33 mm). Adequate occlusion was observed in 95.1% immediately after the procedure and in 98.9% of cases at 1 year DSA follow-up. Overall, 1.0% (1/102; 95% CI 0.0% to 5.3%) of patients experienced a primary safety endpoint of major stroke. Three minor strokes resulted in a modified Rankin Scale score of 2.ConclusionsIn this multicentric, prospective study, stent-assisted coiling of medium size unruptured aneurysms with the Neuroform Atlas stent resulted in a favorable rate of satisfactory occlusion. In our findings, the use of the Y-stenting technique was associated with increased rates of procedural complications.Clinical trial registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02783339.

Efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction in Taiwan

The clinical efficacy of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel has not been replicated in East Asian populations. The pronounced bleeding risk with ticagrelor was of concern given the increased bleeding tendency in Asian populations. This study evaluated efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in the entire Taiwan. We used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database to identify 6203 patients aged ≥ 20 years with NSTEMI hospitalization and prescription of dual antiplatelets at discharge between January 2014 and December 2014. Cohorts of ticagrelor and clopidogrel were matched 1:1 based on propensity score matching to balance baseline covariates. The primary composite efficacy endpoints included death from any cause, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke. The secondary efficacy endpoints were the individual components. The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding requiring hospitalization. The incidence of primary efficacy endpoint was 20.3% in the ticagrelor users and 20.7% in the clopidogrel users (adjusted HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.73–1.22), with the median (interquartile range, IQR) follow-up period of 5.2 (2.3–8.5) months. The incidence of primary safety endpoint was 2.3% in the ticagrelor users and 3.2% in the clopidogrel users (adjusted HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.33–1.35). Regarding the secondary efficacy endpoint, patients treated with ticagrelor had significantly lower incidence of stroke (adjusted HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.21–0.94; p = 0.033). In this nationwide Taiwanese cohort of NSTEMI, treatment with ticagrelor after discharge, as compared to clopidogrel, had similar rates of ischemic composite events and major bleeding. Nevertheless, the median follow-up time was only 5.2 months, and the reduced stroke events with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel needs further verification.

Eliapixant (BAY 1817080), a P2X3 receptor antagonist, in refractory chronic cough: a randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover phase 2a study

ATP acting via P2X3 receptors is an important mediator of refractory chronic cough (RCC). This phase 2a double-blinded crossover study assessed the safety, tolerability and efficacy of eliapixant (BAY 1817080), a selective P2X3 receptor antagonist, in adults with RCC attending specialist centres.In period A, patients received placebo for 2 weeks then eliapixant 10 mg for 1 week. In period B, patients received eliapixant 50, 200 and 750 mg twice daily for 1 week per dose level. Patients were randomised 1:1 to period A–B (n=20) or B–A (n=20). The primary efficacy endpoint was change in cough frequency assessed over 24 h (VitaloJAK). Primary safety endpoint was frequency and severity of adverse events (AEs).Thirty-seven patients completed randomised therapy. Mean cough frequency fell by 17.4% versus baseline with placebo. Eliapixant reduced cough frequency at doses ≥50 mg (reduction versus placebo at 750 mg, 25%: 90% confidence interval, 11.5–36.5%; p=0.002). Doses ≥50 mg also significantly reduced cough severity. AEs, mostly mild or moderate, were reported in 65% of patients with placebo and 41–49% receiving eliapixant. Cumulative rates of taste-related AEs were 3% with placebo and 5–21% with eliapixant: all were mild.Selective P2X3 antagonism with eliapixant significantly reduced cough frequency and severity, confirming this as a viable therapeutic pathway for RCC. Taste-related side-effects were lower at therapeutic doses than with the less selective P2X3 antagonist gefapixant. Selective P2X3 antagonism appears to be a novel therapeutic approach for RCC.

Primary Outcome Evaluation of a Next Generation Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device: Results from the PINNACLE FLX Trial

Background: Left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion provides an alternative to oral anticoagulation (OAC) for thromboembolic risk reduction in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Since regulatory approval in 2015, the WATCHMAN device has been the only LAA closure device available for clinical use in the United States. The PINNACLE FLX study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the next-generation WATCHMAN FLX LAA closure device in patients with NVAF in whom OAC is indicated, but who have an appropriate rationale to seek a non-pharmaceutical alternative. Methods: This was a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center FDA study. The primary safety endpoint was the occurrence of one of the following events within 7 days post-procedure or by hospital discharge, whichever was later: death, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, or device- or procedure-related events requiring cardiac surgery. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the incidence of effective LAA closure (peri-device flow ≤5mm), as assessed by the echocardiography core laboratory at 12-month follow-up. Results: A total of 400 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 73.8{plus minus}8.6 years and the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.2{plus minus}1.5. The incidence of the primary safety endpoint was 0.5% with a one-sided 95% upper confidence interval (CI) of 1.6%, meeting the performance goal (PG) of 4.2% (P<0.0001). The incidence of the primary effectiveness endpoint was 100%, with a onesided 95% lower CI of 99.1%, again meeting the PG of 97.0% (P<0.0001). Device-related thrombus was reported in 7 patients, no patients experienced pericardial effusion requiring open cardiac surgery, and there were no device embolizations. Conclusions: LAA closure with this next generation LAA closure device was associated with a low incidence of adverse events and a high incidence of anatomic closure. Clinical Trial Registration: URL https://clinicaltrials.gov Unique Identifier NCT02702271

Comparative Safety and Efficacy of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion with the Watchman Device and Amplatzer Cardiac Plug: Results of the Russian National Registry

Purpose. This multicenter, prospective registry evaluated the comparative safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) using the Watchman device (WD) and the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in real-world clinical practice in Russia. Methods. The study included data from 200 consecutive NVAF patients ( 66.8 ± 7.8 years, 44.5% female, median CHA2DS2VASc 4, median HAS-BLED 3) who had undergone LAAO implantation using WD ( n = 108 ) or ACP ( n = 92 ) from September 2015 to December 2017 in 5 medical centers in Russia. The primary safety endpoint was the procedure-related major adverse events, and the primary efficacy endpoint was the composite of thromboembolic events, device thrombosis, hemorrhagic events, and unexplained death during the 12-month follow-up. Results. Successful LAAO was performed in all 92 (100%) patients with ACP and 105 (97.2%) with WD ( p = 0.053 ). At 12 months, primary safety endpoint occurred in 6.5% of patients in the ACP group with no events in the WD group (6.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.008 ). During the 12-month follow-up, the primary efficacy endpoint has occurred in 8.3% of patients in the WD group ( n = 9 ) and 1.1% of patients in the ACP group ( n = 1 ) ( p = 0.016 ). Conclusions. In this multicenter prospective registry, LAA closure with the WD was associated with significantly higher thromboembolic events rate in NVAF patients. Patients, receiving the ACP, had more procedure-related major adverse events. However, further multicenter studies are necessary to evaluate these findings.

Optimizing diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease by CT angiography: RCT's final results and 12-months follow-up

Aim In patients (pts) with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), computed tomographic angiography (CTA) may improve pt selection for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as alternative to functional testing. However. the role of CTA in symptomatic pts after abnormal functional test (FT) is incompletely defined. Methods and results This randomized clinical trial conducted in single academic tertiary center selected 218 symptomatic pts with mild to moderately abnormal FT referred to ICA to receive either the originally intended ICA (n=103) or CTA (n=115). CTA interpretation and subsequent care decisions were made by the clinical team. Pts with high risk features on FT, previous acute coronary syndrome, previously documented CAD, chronic kidney disease (GFR&lt;60ml/min/1.73m2) or persistent atrial fibrillation were excluded. The primary endpoint was the percentage of ICA with no significant obstructive CAD (no stenosis ≥50%) in each group. Diagnostic (DY) and revascularization (RY) yields of ICA in either group were also assessed. Pts were followed up for at least 1 year for the primary safety endpoint of all cause death/ nonfatal myocardial infarction/ stroke. Unplanned revascularization (UP) and symptomatic status (SS) were also evaluated. Pts averaged 68±9 years of age, 60% were male, 29% were diabetic. Nuclear perfusion stress test was used in 33.9% in CTA group and 31.1% in control group (p=0.655). Mean post (functional) test probability of obstructive CAD was 34%. Overall prevalence of obstructive CAD was 32.1%. In the CTA group, ICA was cancelled by referring physicians in 83 of the pts (72.2%) after receiving CTA results. For those undergoing ICA, non-obstructive CAD was found in 5 pts (15.6%) in the CTA-guided arm and 60 (58.3%) in the usual care arm (p&lt;0.001 Mean cumulative radiation exposure related to diagnostic work up was similar in both groups (6±14 vs 5±14mSv, p=0.152). Both DY (84.4% vs 41.7, p&lt;0.001) and RY (71.9% vs 38.8%, p=0.001) yields were significantly higher for CTA-guided ICA as compared to standard FT-guided ICA. The rate of the primary safety endpoint was similar between both groups (1.9% vs 0%, p=0.244), as well as the rates of UP (0.9% vs 0.9%, p=1.000) and SS (persistent angina: 29.6% vs 24.8%, p=0.425). Conclusions In pts with suspected CAD and mild to moderately abnormal ischemia test, a diagnostic strategy including CTA as gatekeeper is safe, effective and significantly improves diagnostic and revascularization yields of ICA. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None