scholarly journals P259 Adherence to optimal medical therapy in Asian patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with PCI

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Koh ◽  
W Huang ◽  
F Gao ◽  
J C Allen ◽  
C Liman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Medical Therapy ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Primary Pci ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Β Blockers

Abstract On Behalf SingCLOUD collaborators Background  Notable regional differences have been observed worldwide in clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients experiencing acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Asian patients present younger and report higher adverse outcomes rates compared to Western cohorts. The reasons are multifactorial, but adherence to medication prescription guidelines is one of the modifiable factors. Purpose  Our aim was to study the effect of physician adherence to Optimal Medical Therapy (OMT) prescription guidelines on a MACE outcome in a high-risk group of Asian AMI patients over 1 year following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Method  Data for this retrospective study was from the Singapore Cardiac Longitudinal Outcomes Database (SingCLOUD) pilot study involving AMI patients surviving primary PCI at two tertiary centers from 2012 to 2013. Guideline-directed OMT adherence was defined as concurrent prescription of at least one statin plus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT – aspirin plus P2Y12-I). Prescription of β-blockers and ACE-i/ARBs was also recorded. Prescription status and MACE (repeat MI, stroke, death) was recorded at discharge, 3, 6 and 9 months, and 1 year following the index discharge. The cumulative effect of OMT adherence at 3, 6, 9 months and 1 year post-discharge was studied by comparing risk of first MACE among patient groups with complete, partial and non-adherence to OMT prescription guidelines. Results  2,478 patients, 80.3% males, mean age 60.3 ± 11.7 years were studied. 1094 (44.1%) underwent primary PCI for STEMI. Single drug prescription at discharge for aspirin, P2Y12-I, and statins was 95, 97 and 95.8%, while prescription of β -blockers and ACE-inhibitors was 86.5 and 75.7%. Prescription of statins and aspirin declined gradually while P2Y12-I fell to 67.9% at 6mo and 47.6% at 1 year. Adherence to OMT declined from 92.3% at discharge to 82.1, 58.5, 56.1 and 40.3% at 3, 6, 9 months and 1 year, respectively. Of 342 (13.8%) occurrences of first MACE, 48.5% occurred within 3mo post-discharge. Complete adherence to OMT upon discharge significantly decreased risk of MACE at 3mo (OR = 0.066; 95% CI: 0.054-0.080; p < 0.001) and 12mo (OR = 0.017; 95% CI: 0.010-0.028; p < 0.001) relative to non-adherence. Conclusion  Over the course of a year in this high-risk group of PCI-treated AMI patients, there was a reduction in prescription adherence to the minimally essential OMT. Complete OMT adherence is beneficial in reducing MACE. Interventions targeting reasons for non-adherence are important in improving patient outcomes. Abstract P259 Figure 1 - Medication over 1 year

scholarly journals Comparison of Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Score and Heart Score in risk stratification of acute myocardial infarction patients, prognostic accuracy and arrhythmia incidence

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 3300
Author(s):  
Keerthana Batyala ◽  
M. V. Nagabhushana ◽  
Malli Dorasanamma
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Heart Score ◽  
Prognostic Accuracy ◽  
Timi Score

Background: To compare TIMI & HEART SCORE for their risk stratification in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients,  prognostic accuracy and Arrhythmia incidence.Methods: This observational study is conducted in a Tertiary care hospital over a period of 2 years from August 2017 to July 2019. A total of 100 patients presented to ER with Chest Pain are selected for study. Patients were monitored for a period of one month in ICCU.Results: In present study out of 61 cases with TIMI score ≥5, mortality of 11.5%(7 cases, p value 0.028). Heart score more than 6  constitutes high risk group, out of which mortality was observed in 7.45% cases (p=0.48). Most of the arrhythmias (70.49%) in present study observed in patients with TIMI score ≥5 (High risk group) which is statistically significant with p value 0.002. Most of the arrhythmias in present study observed in patients with HS ≥8 which is not statistically significant with p value 0.135.Conclusions: In present study, overall mortality rate was 7% and these patients who died constitutes to high risk group with TIMI. HEART SCORE identified more patients as low risk compared to TIMI SCORE. TIMI SCORE is a good predictor of arrhythmia incidence.

PREDICTORS OF REINFARCTION AND SUDDEN DEATH IN A HIGH-RISK GROUP OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION SURVIVORS

The Lancet ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 313 (8110) ◽  
pp. 233-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Hunt ◽  
Angas Hamer ◽  
Anne Duffield ◽  
Geoffrey Baker ◽  
Christina Penington ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Sudden Death ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Group

scholarly journals Pre-hospital risk assessment in suspected non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: A prospective observational study

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique N van Dongen ◽  
Rudolf T Tolsma ◽  
Marion J Fokkert ◽  
Erik A Badings ◽  
Aize van der Sluis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Heart Score ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
St Elevation

Background: Pre-hospital risk stratification of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) by the complete HEART score has not yet been assessed. We investigated whether pre-hospital risk stratification of patients with suspected NSTE-ACS using the HEART score is accurate in predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Methods: This is a prospective observational study, including 700 patients with suspected NSTE-ACS. Risk stratification was performed by ambulance paramedics, using the HEART score; low risk was defined as HEART score ⩽ 3. Primary endpoint was occurrence of MACE within 45 days after inclusion. Secondary endpoint was myocardial infarction or death. Results: A total of 172 patients (24.6%) were stratified as low risk and 528 patients (75.4%) as intermediate to high risk. Mean age was 53.9 years in the low risk group and 66.7 years in the intermediate to high risk group ( p<0.001), 50% were male in the low risk group versus 60% in the intermediate to high risk group ( p=0.026). MACE occurred in five patients in the low risk group (2.9%) and in 111 (21.0%) patients at intermediate or high risk ( p<0.001). There were no deaths in the low risk group and the occurrence of acute myocardial infarction in this group was 1.2%. In the high risk group six patients died (1.1%) and 76 patients had myocardial infarction (14.4%). Conclusions: In suspected NSTE-ACS, pre-hospital risk stratification by ambulance paramedics, including troponin measurement, is accurate in differentiating between low and intermediate to high risk. Future studies should investigate whether transportation of low risk patients to a hospital can be avoided, and whether high risk patients benefit from immediate transfer to a hospital with early coronary angiography possibilities.

Abstract 14084: Albuminuria and Prognosis Among Individuals With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (aric) Study

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yejin Mok ◽  
Shoshana Ballew ◽  
Richard Stacey ◽  
Joseph Rossi ◽  
Silvia Koton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Kidney Function ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Composite Outcome ◽  
Clinical Conditions ◽  
Reduced Kidney Function ◽  
Aric Study ◽  
Very High

Background: The AHA/ACC 2018 Cholesterol Guideline categorizes ASCVD patients into very high-risk vs. high-risk to guide intensive therapy. This categorization is based on clinical conditions, including reduced kidney function, but does not take into account albuminuria, the other kidney measure often available in clinical practice. Methods: We studied 838 participants with major ASCVD (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or symptomatic peripheral artery disease) from the ARIC study at baseline (1996 - 98). We compared urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) and the eight high-risk conditions of age 65+, reduced kidney function, diabetes, etc. in the AHA/ACC Guideline regarding their associations with composite outcome of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and heart failure. We also evaluated risk classification by adding ACR to the eight high-risk conditions. Results: During a median follow-up of 8 years, 724 (86%) participants developed a composite outcome. ACR ≥30 mg/g was associated with the composite outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.45 [95% CI 1.20, 1.75]) beyond the eight high-risk conditions (aHR of these conditions ranged from 0.96 to 2.46). The addition of ACR improved the c-statistic by 0.011 (95% CI 0.003-0.019) from 0.661 to 0.672. ACR classified 4.6% of high-risk group to very high-risk and 11.2% of very high-risk group to extremely very high-risk with a reasonable calibration (Figure). Even ACR ≥10 mg/g showed a significant aHR of 1.38 (1.17, 1.63) and classified 13.4% of high-risk and 18.1% very high-risk to a higher risk category. Of our patients with ASCVD, 77% had diabetes, hypertension, or low kidney function, clinical conditions in which the ACR assessment is recommended. Conclusions: In ASCVD, albuminuria was a strong predictor of major adverse cardiovascular outcome and improved risk prediction. Clinicians should pay attention to albuminuria, in addition to eGFR, when managing ASCVD patients.

P3609Temporal trends of the management and outcomes of patients after myocardial infarction according to the risk for recurrent cardiovascular events

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Grinberg ◽  
T Bental ◽  
Y Hammer ◽  
A R Assali ◽  
H Vaknin-Assa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Temporal Trends ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

Abstract Background Following Myocardial Infarction (MI), patients are at increased risk for recurrent cardiovascular events, particularly during the immediate period. Yet some patients are at higher risk than others, owing to their clinical characteristics and comorbidities, these high-risk patients are less often treated with guideline-recommended therapies. Aim To examine temporal trends in treatment and outcomes of patients with MI according to the TIMI risk score for secondary prevention (TRS2°P), a recently validated risk stratification tool. Methods A retrospective cohort study of patients with an acute MI, who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and were discharged alive between 2004–2016. Temporal trends were examined in the early (2004–2010) and late (2011–2016) time-periods. Patients were stratified by the TRS2°P to a low (≤1), intermediate (2) or high-risk group (≥3). Clinical outcomes included 30-day MACE (death, MI, target vessel revascularization, coronary artery bypass grafting, unstable angina or stroke) and 1-year mortality. Results Among 4921 patients, 31% were low-risk, 27% intermediate-risk and 42% high-risk. Compared to low and intermediate-risk patients, high-risk patients were older, more commonly female, and had more comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, and chronic kidney disease. They presented more often with non ST elevation MI and 3-vessel disease. High-risk patients were less likely to receive drug eluting stents and potent anti-platelet drugs, among other guideline-recommended therapies. Evidently, they experienced higher 30-day MACE (8.1% vs. 3.9% and 2.1% in intermediate and low-risk, respectively, P<0.001) and 1-year mortality (10.4% vs. 3.9% and 1.1% in intermediate and low-risk, respectively, P<0.001). During time, comparing the early to the late-period, the use of potent antiplatelets and statins increased among the entire cohort (P<0.001). However, only the high-risk group demonstrated a significantly lower 30-day MACE (P=0.001). During time, there were no differences in 1-year mortality rate among all risk categories. Temporal trends in 30-day MACE by TRS2°P Conclusion Despite a better application of guideline-recommended therapies, high-risk patients after MI are still relatively undertreated. Nevertheless, they demonstrated the most notable improvement in outcomes over time.

Clinical assessment and angiographic finding in patients with non ST-elevation myocardial infarction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Elbeyali
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
St Elevation Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Risk ◽  
St Elevation

Abstract Background Non ST-elevation myocardial infarction is considered the intermediate form of acute coronary syndrome between unstable angina and ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Blockage either occurs in a minor coronary artery or causes partial obstruction of a major coronary artery. The rate of NSTEMI has increased to be 50% of all acute coronary syndrome. Purpose To compare some demographic, clinical risk assessments and angiographic data among high, intermediate and low risk NSTEMI patients. Methods We classified one hundred twenty (120) NSTEMI patients into 3groups by GRACE risk score (high risk group &gt;140, intermediate risk group from 109 to 140 and low risk group ≤108). The patients were evaluated by personal history taking, risk factors, clinical examination, ECG, laboratory investigations, echocardiography and percutaneous coronary intervention. Results We found that low risk group percentage was 47.5%, intermediate risk group percentage was 32.5% and high-risk group percentage was 20%. As regarding culprit lesion, LAD represent most affected artery (48.3% of patients).Recurrent ischemia and MI represent the highest percentage of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) among studied groups. All patients with LM disease have a MACE while 41.2% of MACE patients have significant LAD lesion. As time of intervention delayed the incidence of MACE increases among different groups. High risk group has significantly high percentage of type C lesion and TIMI 0/1 while type A lesion and TIMI III lesion highest among low risk patients. As regarding contour of the lesion, the irregularity increases as the clinical risk increases. Also as regarding occlusion of culprit artery, the incidence of total occlusion increases as the clinical risk increases. Conclusions We recommend selection of high-risk NSTEMI patient to direct them for early invasive therapy. Very high-risk directed for immediate revascularization like STEMI patient. NSTEMI considered precursors to STEMI and an early warning signal that aggressive medical intervention needed. Association between time to intervention Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): University budget

scholarly journals Study of in-hospital outcome in acute myocardial infarction in correlation with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 2377
Author(s):  
Pravin Shingade ◽  
Vinay Meshram ◽  
Umesh Madavi
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Moderate Risk ◽  
Hospital Outcome ◽  
Timi Risk Score

Background: The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score is purportedly an integral score for mortality risk prediction in fibrinolysis-eligible patients with STEMI. Attempt was made to evaluate the same by correlating risk stratification by TIMI score with hospital outcome of such patients.Methods: There were 145 cases of STEMI were studied and TIMI risk scores were calculated and analysed vis-à-vis various relevant parameters. The patients were divided into three risk groups: ‘low-risk’, ‘moderate-risk’ and ‘high-risk’ based on their TIMI scores. All patients received routine anti-ischemic therapy and were thrombolysed subsequently, monitored in ICCU and followed during hospital stay for occurrence of post-MI complications.Results: There were 79 patients (54.5%) belonged to low-risk group, 48 (33.1%) to moderate-risk group and 18 (12.4%) to high-risk group according to TIMI risk score. The mortality (total 17 deaths) was observed to be highest in the high-risk group (55.6%), followed by moderate-risk (12.2%) and low-risk group (1.28%) respectively. Out of the 7 potentially suspect variables studied, Killips classification grade 2-4 had the highest relative risk (RR-15.85), followed by systolic BP <100mmHg (RR- 10.48), diabetes mellitus (RR- 2.79) and age >65 years (RR- 2.59).Conclusions: The TIMI risk scoring system seems to be one simple, valid and practical bed side tool in quantitative risk stratification and short-term prognosis prediction in patients with STEMI.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document