scholarly journals Technical feasibility of leadless left bundle branch area pacing for cardiac resynchronisation: a case series

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark K Elliott ◽  
Peggy Jacon ◽  
Baldeep Singh Sidhu ◽  
Lucy Jarrett Smith ◽  
Vishal Mehta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Technical Feasibility ◽  
Leadless Pacemaker ◽  
First Case ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronisation ◽  
Endocardial Pacing ◽  
Endocardial Electrode

Abstract Background Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a novel form of conduction system pacing which can reverse left bundle branch block and deliver cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT). The WiSE-CRT system delivers leadless endocardial pacing with symptomatic and left ventricular (LV) remodelling improvements following intervention. We report the technical feasibility of delivering leadless LBBAP using the WiSE-CRT system. Case Summary In case 1, a 57-year-old male with ischaemic cardiomyopathy and complete heart block underwent implantation of the WiSE-CRT system, using a retrograde trans-aortic approach, after failed conventional CRT. Temporary left bundle stimulation from the LV septum achieved superior electrical resynchronisation and equivalent haemodynamic response compared to endocardial pacing at the lateral LV wall. In case 2, an 82-year-old gentleman with tachyarrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy underwent WiSE-CRT implantation via a trans-septal intra-atrial approach, with the endocardial electrode successfully deployed in the LV septum. Discussion Here we report the first case of deployment of the WiSE-CRT endocardial electrode in the LV septum, and demonstrate the technical feasibility of leadless LBBAP. Entirely leadless CRT is an attractive option for patients with venous access issues or recurrent lead complications and has previously been successful using the WiSE-CRT system and a leadless pacemaker in the right ventricle. Further studies are required to assess long-term efficacy and safety of leadless LBBAP.

scholarly journals Leadless Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing and Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-50
Author(s):  
Baldeep S Sidhu ◽  
Justin Gould ◽  
Mark K Elliott ◽  
Vishal Mehta ◽  
Steven Niederer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronisation ◽  
Resynchronisation Therapy ◽  
Potential Benefits ◽  
Endocardial Pacing ◽  
Procedural Outcomes ◽  
Improve Patient

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy is an important intervention to reduce mortality and morbidity, but even in carefully selected patients approximately 30% fail to improve. This has led to alternative pacing approaches to improve patient outcomes. Left ventricular (LV) endocardial pacing allows pacing at site-specific locations that enable the operator to avoid myocardial scar and target areas of latest activation. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) provides a more physiological activation pattern and may allow effective cardiac resynchronisation. This article discusses LV endocardial pacing in detail, including the indications, techniques and outcomes. It discusses LBBAP, its potential benefits over His bundle pacing and procedural outcomes. Finally, it concludes with the future role of endocardial pacing and LBBAP in heart failure patients.

scholarly journals Left ventricular endocardial pacing in cardiac resynchronisation therapy: Moving from bench to bedside

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 118-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. A. Bracke ◽  
B. M. van Gelder ◽  
L. R. C. Dekker ◽  
P. Houthuizen ◽  
J. F. ter Woorst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronisation ◽  
Resynchronisation Therapy ◽  
Endocardial Pacing

Optimisation of Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy with MultiPoint™ Pacing

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 3
Author(s):  
Antonio Curnis ◽  
David O’Donnell ◽  
Axel Kloppe ◽  
Žarko Calovic ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systolic Function ◽  
Biventricular Pacing ◽  
Heart Rhythm ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Optimal Placement ◽  
Jude Medical ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronisation ◽  
Resynchronisation Therapy

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) using biventricular pacing is an established therapy for impairment of left ventricular (LV) systolic function in patients with heart failure (HF). Although technological advances have improved outcomes in patients undergoing biventricular pacing, the optimal placement of pacing leads remains challenging, and approximately one third of patients have no response to CRT. This may be due to patient selection and lead placement. Electrical mapping can greatly improve outcomes in CRT and increase the number of patients who derive benefit from the procedure. MultiPoint™ pacing (St Jude Medical, St Paul, MN, US) using a quadripolar lead increases the possibility of finding the best pacing site. In clinical studies, use of MultiPoint pacing in HF patients undergoing CRT has been associated with haemodynamic and clinical benefits compared with conventional biventricular pacing, and these benefits have been sustained at 12 months. This article describes the proceedings of a satellite symposium held at the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Europace conference held in Milan, Italy, in June 2015.

Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy – Evolving Strategies to Enhance Response

2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Jagmeet P Singh ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Systolic Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronisation ◽  
Clinical Benefits ◽  
Pacing Lead ◽  
Resynchronisation Therapy ◽  
Physiological Impact

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) has gained widespread acceptance as a safe and effective therapeutic strategy for congestive heart failure (CHF) refractory to optimal medical therapy. The use of implantable devices has substantially altered the natural history of systolic heart failure. These devices exert their physiological impact through ventricular remodelling, associated with a reduction in left ventricular (LV) volumes and an improvement in ejection fraction (EF). Several prospective randomised studies have shown that this in turn translates into long-term clinical benefits such as improved quality of life, increased functional capacity and reduction in hospitalisation for heart failure and overall mortality. Despite these obvious benefits, there remain more than a few unresolved concerns, the most important being that up to one-third of patients treated with CRT do not derive any detectable benefit. There are several determinants of successful delivery and response to CRT, including selecting the appropriate patient, patient-specific optimal LV pacing lead placement and appropriate post-implant device care and follow-up. This article highlights the importance of collectively working on all of these aspects of CRT to enhance and maximise response.

Emerging Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Indications

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
Charlotte Eitel ◽  
Gerhard Hindricks ◽  
Christopher Piorkowski ◽  
◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Systolic Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronisation ◽  
Resynchronisation Therapy

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is an efficacious and cost-effective therapy in patients with highly symptomatic systolic heart failure and delayed ventricular conduction. Current guidelines recommend CRT as a class I indication for patients with sinus rhythm, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or ambulatory class IV, a QRS duration ≥120ms, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, despite optimal pharmacological therapy. Recent trials resulted in an extension of current recommendations to patients with mild heart failure, patients with atrial fibrillation, and patients with an indication for permanent right ventricular pacing with the aim of morbidity reduction. The effectiveness of CRT in patients with narrow QRS, patients with end-stage heart failure and cardiogenic shock, and patients with an LVEF >35% still needs to be proved. This article reviews current evidence and clinical applications of CRT in heart failure and provides an outlook on future developments.

scholarly journals Acute recoordination rather than functional hemodynamic improvement determines reverse remodelling by cardiac resynchronisation therapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe C. Wouters ◽  
Geert E. Leenders ◽  
Maarten J. Cramer ◽  
Mathias Meine ◽  
Frits W. Prinzen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systolic Function ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Lv Function ◽  
Peak Strain ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronisation ◽  
Reverse Remodelling ◽  
Resynchronisation Therapy ◽  
Lv Systolic Function

AbstractPurpose: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) improves left ventricular (LV) function acutely, with further improvements and reverse remodelling during chronic CRT. The current study investigated the relation between acute improvement of LV systolic function, acute mechanical recoordination, and long-term reverse remodelling after CRT. Methods: In 35 patients, LV speckle tracking longitudinal strain, LV volumes & ejection fraction (LVEF) were assessed by echocardiography before, acutely within three days, and 6 months after CRT. A subgroup of 25 patients underwent invasive assessment of the maximal rate of LV pressure rise (dP/dtmax,) during CRT-implantation. The acute change in dP/dtmax, LVEF, systolic discoordination (internal stretch fraction [ISF] and LV systolic rebound stretch [SRSlv]) and systolic dyssynchrony (standard deviation of peak strain times [2DS-SD18]) was studied, and their association with long-term reverse remodelling were determined. Results: CRT induced acute and ongoing recoordination (ISF from 45 ± 18 to 27 ± 11 and 23 ± 12%, p < 0.001; SRS from 2.27 ± 1.33 to 0.74 ± 0.50 and 0.71 ± 0.43%, p < 0.001) and improved LV function (dP/dtmax 668 ± 185 vs. 817 ± 198 mmHg/s, p < 0.001; stroke volume 46 ± 15 vs. 54 ± 20 and 52 ± 16 ml; LVEF 19 ± 7 vs. 23 ± 8 and 27 ± 10%, p < 0.001). Acute recoordination related to reverse remodelling (r = 0.601 and r = 0.765 for ISF & SRSlv, respectively, p < 0.001). Acute functional improvements of LV systolic function however, neither related to reverse remodelling nor to the extent of acute recoordination. Conclusion: Long-term reverse remodelling after CRT is likely determined by (acute) recoordination rather than by acute hemodynamic improvements. Discoordination may therefore be a more important CRT-substrate that can be assessed and, acutely restored.

scholarly journals Gender in cardiac resynchronisation therapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 197-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana N. Enina ◽  
Vadim A. Kuznetsov ◽  
Anna M. Soldatova ◽  
Tatiana I. Petelina ◽  
Dmitriy V. Krinochkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Group Dynamics ◽  
Systemic Inflammation ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Neurohormonal Activation ◽  
Tissue Inhibitors ◽  
Group I ◽  
Tnf Α ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronisation ◽  
Resynchronisation Therapy

Introduction: Gender differences in cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) response are not clear enough. This study aimed to assess gender influence on systemic inflammation, neurohormonal activation, fibrosis in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and CRT. Methods: We compared group I (61 men) and group II (16 women) of patients undergoing CRT. Plasma levels of Nt-proBNP, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), C-reactive protein, galectin-3 (Gal-3), metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase 1 and 4 (TIMP-1, TIMP-4), ratio MMP-9/TIMP-1, MMP-9/TIMP-4 were measured. According to dynamics of left ventricular end-systolic volume patients were classified into non-responders, responders, super-responders. Results: Women more likely had left bundle branch block (81.3 vs 47.5%, P = 0.016), were more super-responders (66.7 vs 30.5%). Both groups showed decrease of IL-6 (P < 0.05), TNF-α (P < 0.001; P < 0.05), NT-proBNP (P = 0.001; P < 0.05), Gal-3 (P < 0.05). In women there was decrease of IL-6 by 44.4 vs 23.5% in men (P = 0.029), TNF-α by 41.4 vs 30.9%, NT-proBNP by 73.3 vs 46% (P = 0.002), Gal-3 by 82.3 vs 64.9% (P < 0.05). Group I also showed decrease of IL-10 by 34.2% (P < 0.05). Group dynamics of TIMP-1 was opposite: men showed tendency to reduction of TIMP-1 (P = 0.054), women showed increase of TIMP-1 (P < 0.05). Besides, men showed decrease of MMP-9 (P < 0.05) and ratio MMP-9/TIMP-4 (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The best response to CRT is associated with female gender explained by greater decrease of neurohormonal activation, systemic inflammation and fibrosis. The revealed opposite dynamics of TIMP-1 in the groups can demonstrate the existence of gender features of matrix metalloproteinase system activity and their tissue inhibitors.

scholarly journals Use of Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy – Change of Clinical Settings

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khang-Li Looi ◽  
Anthony SL Tang ◽  
Sharad Agarwal
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction ◽  
Surface Ecg ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronisation ◽  
Resynchronisation Therapy ◽  
Qrs Duration

Current guidelines recommend cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) for patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤35 %), QRS duration of ≥120–150 ms (Class IA and IB indications) on surface electrocardiogram (ECG) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV heart failure (HF) symptoms. Ongoing studies aim to expand the use of CRT in patients with asymptomatic or minimal symptoms left ventricular dysfunction. There have been studies that have shown benefit of CRT extended to this group of patients. There have also been different implications of the role of CRT in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), patients with narrow QRS duration or with right bundle branch block (RBBB) on surface ECG, as well as patients with end-stage renal failure on dialysis therapy. This article aims to review the current body of evidence of expanding use of CRT in these populations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document