scholarly journals How to remove an embolized TriClip from the femoral vein? Case report

Author(s):  
Issameddine Ajmi ◽  
Steffen Schnupp ◽  
Hesham Mady ◽  
Christian Mahnkopf

Abstract Background and case summary We report a case of a 76-year old female who was admitted to our hospital because of dyspnoea caused by a known high-grade tricuspid valve regurgitation. The patient received an edge-to-edge reparation of the tricuspid valve one month before the current admission using the TriClip XTR (Clip) system. The postinterventional echocardiographic results were satisfying, and the patient was discharged with tricuspid valve regurgitation grade I. At this new admission, the echocardiographic control showed a missing Clip on the tricuspid valve with a recurrent high-grade regurgitation. Fluoroscopy showed the dislocated Clip at the level of the femoral vein. This was also confirmed using Duplex sonography with no signs of thrombosis or embolization. The challenge was how to extract the Clip using endovascular methods as the patient refused any kind of surgical removal. We managed to remove the 20 x 10 mm big clip using transfemoral access and an endovascular snare system. No postinterventional complications were registered. The patient was discharged after the intervention with a new scheduled Clip procedure. Discussion This case shows a possible safe and challenging alternative to removing dislocated Clip from the femoral vein. Experienced operators are required to have the knowledge and skills to manage these possible procedural complications using the appropriate apparatus. A surgical technique would be, in this case, common practice, however as the patient declined surgical intervention, the endovascular approach was the alternative option.

2010 ◽  
Vol 139 (6) ◽  
pp. 1473-1482.e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose L. Navia ◽  
Edward R. Nowicki ◽  
Eugene H. Blackstone ◽  
Nicolas A. Brozzi ◽  
Daniel E. Nento ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
pp. 169-173
Author(s):  
A.W. Treusch ◽  
O. Oldenburg ◽  
T. Butz ◽  
A. Fründ ◽  
E. Oepangat ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Licheng Yan ◽  
Fuzhen Zheng ◽  
Haiyu Chen ◽  
Jiayin Bao ◽  
Guoxing Weng

Abstract BACKGROUNDː This study compared the perioperative and follow-up period data of patients who underwent redo tricuspid valve replacements performed via thoracoscopic surgery or median sternotomy. The purpose was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and surgical outcomes of redo tricuspid valve replacement via uni-port thoracoscopic surgery. METHODSː Forty-nine patients with severe tricuspid valve regurgitation after left-side valve replacement underwent redo tricuspid valve replacements in our hospital from April 2012 to September 2019. 26 patients underwent uni-port total thoracoscopy surgery, whereas 23 patients had the surgery performed via median sternotomy. We collected perioperative and 3- to 36-month postoperative data. RESULTSː No deaths occurred in the intraoperative period. Time of cardiopulmonary bypass in the study group was significantly longer than that in the control group (P<0.05), but the operative times in the study and control groups were not significantly different. Thoracic drainage, length of ICU stay, postoperative hospital stay and complication rates in the study group were significantly different from those in the control group (P<0.05). Throughout the follow-up period, uni-port total thoracoscopic TVR is not inferior to traditional surgery with respect to cardiac function and recurrence of tricuspid valve regurgitation. CONCLUSIONSː Uni-port total thoracoscopic tricuspid valve replacement is safe, feasible and effective, and that can be considered as a primary treatment strategy for patients with severe TR after previous left-sided valve procedure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document