scholarly journals A pathway distinct from the mammalian unfolded protein response regulates expression of endoplasmic reticulum chaperones in non-stressed cells

1997 ◽  
Vol 16 (23) ◽  
pp. 7207-7216 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Brewer
2006 ◽  
Vol 396 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fang-Chun Sun ◽  
Shou Wei ◽  
Chia-Wei Li ◽  
Yuo-Sheng Chang ◽  
Chih-Chung Chao ◽  
...  

The ubiquitously expressed molecular chaperone GRP78 (78 kDa glucose-regulated protein) generally localizes to the ER (endoplasmic reticulum). GRP78 is specifically induced in cells under the UPR (unfolded protein response), which can be elicited by treatments with calcium ionophore A23187 and sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase inhibitor TG (thapsigargin). By using confocal microscopy, we have demonstrated that GRP78 was concentrated in the perinuclear region and co-localized with the ER marker proteins, calnexin and PDI (protein disulphide-isomerase), in cells under normal growth conditions. However, treatments with A23187 and TG led to diminish its ER targeting, resulting in redirection into a cytoplasmic vesicular pattern, and overlapping with the mitochondrial marker MitoTracker. Cellular fractionation and protease digestion of isolated mitochondria from ER-stressed cells suggested that a significant portion of GRP78 is localized to the mitochondria and is protease-resistant. Localizations of GRP78 in ER and mitochondria were confirmed by using immunoelectron microscopy. In ER-stressed cells, GRP78 mainly localized within the mitochondria and decorated the mitochondrial membrane compartment. Submitochondrial fractionation studies indicated further that the mitochondria-resided GRP78 is mainly located in the intermembrane space, inner membrane and matrix, but is not associated with the outer membrane. Furthermore, radioactive labelling followed by subcellular fractionation showed that a significant portion of the newly synthesized GRP78 is localized to the mitochondria in cells under UPR. Taken together, our results indicate that, at least under certain circumstances, the ER-resided chaperone GRP78 can be retargeted to mitochondria and thereby may be involved in correlating UPR signalling between these two organelles.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arunkumar Sundaram ◽  
Suhila Appathurai ◽  
Malaiyalam Mariappan

AbstractThe endoplasmic reticulum (ER) localized unfolded protein response (UPR) sensors, IRE1α, PERK, and ATF6α, are activated upon accumulation of misfolded proteins caused by ER stress. It is debated whether these UPR sensors are activated either by the release of their negative regulator BiP chaperone or directly binding to misfolded proteins during ER stress. Here we simultaneously examined oligomerization and activation of all three endogenous UPR sensors. We found that UPR sensors existed as preformed oligomers even in unstressed cells, which shifted to large oligomers for PERK and small oligomers for ATF6α, but little changed for IRE1α upon ER stress. Neither depletion nor overexpression of BiP had significant effects on oligomeric complexes of UPR sensors both in unstressed and stressed cells. Thus, our results find less evidence for the BiP-mediated activation of UPR sensors in mammalian cells and support that misfolded proteins bind and activate the preformed oligomers of UPR sensors.


1997 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1805-1814 ◽  
Author(s):  
J S Cox ◽  
R E Chapman ◽  
P Walter

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is a multifunctional organelle responsible for production of both lumenal and membrane components of secretory pathway compartments. Secretory proteins are folded, processed, and sorted in the ER lumen and lipid synthesis occurs on the ER membrane itself. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, synthesis of ER components is highly regulated: the ER-resident proteins by the unfolded protein response and membrane lipid synthesis by the inositol response. We demonstrate that these two responses are intimately linked, forming different branches of the same pathway. Furthermore, we present evidence indicating that this coordinate regulation plays a role in ER biogenesis.


2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 2437-2445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soumen Kahali ◽  
Bhaswati Sarcar ◽  
Antony Prabhu ◽  
Edward Seto ◽  
Prakash Chinnaiyan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document