scholarly journals DOAC versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and stage IV-V chronic kideny disease including patients on dialysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Wartanian ◽  
C Lewinter ◽  
R Edfors
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Intracranial Bleeding ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Gi Bleeding ◽  
Dialysis Patients ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Introduction Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) were excluded from most phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Evidence of warfarin versus DOAC in the AF population with stage IV-V CKD is therefore limited. Aim To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DOAC compared with warfarin on this population including dialysis patients. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs and observational studies involving AF patients with stage IV-V CKD treated with warfarin versus DOACs were conducted to evaluate the following outcomes: stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic) or systemic embolism (SE), all-cause mortality, major bleeding, gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, and intracranial bleeding. If the heterogeneity between studies was moderate to high calculated as the I2 ≥50%, a meta regression was undertaken between baseline characteristics and the study outcomes. We conducted a literature search using key words related to AF, severe CKD, DOAC and warfarin in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library. Results Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to warfarin, DOAC was significantly associated with a reduced risk of stroke or systemic embolism (SE) (risk ratio [RR] = 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50–0.95) (Figure 1), intracranial bleeding (RR=0.54; 95% CI 0.35–0.84) and hemorrhagic stroke (RR=0.39; 95% CI 0.16–0.95). There was no significant difference between DOACs and warfarin in the risk of all-cause mortality (RR=0.80; 95% CI 0.57–1.13), major bleeding (RR = 0.70; 95% CI 0.44–1.11) (Figure 2) and GI bleeding (RR=0.76; 95% CI 0.56–1.02). For the outcome stroke or SE, dabigatran (compared with apixaban) significantly eliminated the net effect of DOAC as compared with warfarin (coefficient, 0.8; P=0.003). Regarding major bleeding, rivaroxaban and dabigatran both eliminated the DOAC effect from the meta-analysis as compared to apixaban (P=0.01 & P<0.0001). Dabigatran significantly increased the risk of GI bleeding in comparison to apixaban (coefficient, 0.48; P=0.002) in comparison with the overall similar effect of warfarin in the meta-analysis. Conclusion Among patients with AF and stage IV or V CKD including dialysis patients, DOAC appears to have similar or better effectiveness and safety compared to warfarin. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Stroke or systemic embolism

3054Efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Cavallari ◽  
G Verolino ◽  
G Patti
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Anticoagulation in patients with cancer and atrial fibrillation (AF) is particularly challenging given the higher risk of both thrombotic and bleeding complications in this setting. Data regarding the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in AF patients with malignancy remain unclear. Purpose In the present meta-analysis we further investigate the efficacy and safety of NOACs compared to warfarin in patients with AF and cancer assuming that available studies may be individually underpowered for endpoints at low incidence, i.e. stroke, major and intracranial bleeding. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the use of NOACs vs. warfarin in AF patients with cancer. Efficacy outcome measures included stroke or systemic embolism, venous thromboembolism and mortality. Safety outcome measures were major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage. Results We pooled data from 6 identified studies enrolling a total of 31,756 AF patients with cancer. Mean follow-up was 1.7 years. Patients with cancer had significantly increased annualized rates of venous thromboembolism (1.38% vs. 0.74%), major bleeding (9.01% vs. 5.13%), in particular major gastrointestinal bleeding (2.38% vs. 1.60%), and all-cause mortality (17.73% vs. 8.50%) vs. those without (all P values <0.001), whereas the incidence of stroke or systemic embolism and intracranial hemorrhage did not differ. Compared with warfarin, treatment with NOACs nominally decreased the risk of stroke or systemic embolism (5.41% vs. 2.70%; odds ratio, OR; 95% confidence intervals, CI 0.51, 0.26–1.01; P=0.05; Figure), mainly of ischemic stroke (OR 0.56; 95% CI 0.35–0.89; P=0.01), and the risk of venous thromboembolism (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.42–0.61; P<0.001). In cancer patients receiving NOACs there was a significant reduction of major bleeding (3.95% vs. 4.66%; OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46–0.94; P=0.02; Figure) and intracranial hemorrhage (0.26% vs. 0.66%; OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08–0.82; P=0.02) vs. warfarin, with no difference in gastrointestinal major bleeding rates. Conclusion AF patients on oral anticoagulation and concomitant cancer are at higher risk of venous thromboembolism, major bleeding and all-cause mortality. NOACs may represent a safer and more effective alternative to warfarin also in this setting of patients.

Abstract 215: Efficacy and Safety of Novel Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) in Asian population with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) - A Meta-Analysis

Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayumi Fukuda ◽  
Daniel E Singer ◽  
Paul A Bain ◽  
Shoichiro Sato ◽  
Daiki Kobayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Hemorrhagic Stroke ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Asian Population ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Bleeding Events

Background and purpose: Asians have higher risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) compared to non-Asians. Although recent clinical trials have shown non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were favorable in preventing ICH as well as thrombotic events among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), it is unclear whether the efficacy and safety of NOACs are consistent among Asians. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of NOACs in Asians with NVAF. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, the Western Pacific Index Medicus, Clinicaltrials.Gov and supplemented with conference abstracts were searched up to June 2014. Phase III randomized control trials that reported efficacy and safety of NOACs vs. warfarin in Asians and non-Asians with NVAF were identified. Each study was reviewed by two reviewers and differences were resolved by consensus. The end points analyzed were all stroke or systemic embolism, ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, major or clinically relevant non major bleeding events (CRNM), and ICH. The hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) of each endpoint in NOACs compared to warfarin was extracted separately among Asians and non-Asians. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled HR and 95% CI. Results: 5 eligible studies were identified. Total of 8928 Asians and 64023 non-Asians were included. All stroke or systemic embolism were significantly reduced with NOACs in Asians (HR: 0.72 [95% CI: 0.59-0.88], p=0.002) but not in non-Asians (HR: 0.82 [0.66-1.01], p=0.097). The risk of ischemic stroke was not decreased in Asians (HR: 0.88 [0.64-1.21], p=0.43) or non-Asians (HR: 0.98 [0.80-1.12], p=0.73), whereas the risk of hemorrhagic stroke was significantly decreased in both groups (HR: 0.28 [0.17-0.47], p<0.001 for Asians, HR: 0.37 [0.24-0.55], p<0.001, respectively). The risk of major bleeding or CRNM was significantly reduced in Asians (HR: 0.68 [0.56-0.83], p<0.001) but not in non-Asians (HR: 0.78 [0.60-1.0], p=0.21). The risk of ICH was significantly decreased in both groups (HR: 0.30 [0.21-0.42], p<0.001, HR: 0.41 [0.34-0.48], p<0.001, respectively). Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of NOACs in Asians with NVAF is consistent with the overall results.

scholarly journals Non–Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Asians With Atrial Fibrillation

Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (10) ◽  
pp. 2819-2828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengbiao Xue ◽  
Hao Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Real World ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Intracranial Bleeding ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Real World Data

Background and Purpose— Several randomized trials and real-world studies have reported the efficacy and safety of non–vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation; and therefore, this meta-analysis was aimed to compare the effects of NOACs with warfarin for atrial fibrillation stroke prevention in Asians. Methods— The PubMed and Embase databases were searched from January 2009 to February 2019 for studies on comparisons of NOACs versus warfarin in Asians. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were pooled using a random-effects model. Results— Five NOAC trials and 21 observational cohorts were included. For the NOAC trials, compared with warfarin, NOACs was associated with reduced risks of stroke or systemic embolism (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59–0.90), all-cause death (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73–0.95), major bleeding (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.48–0.72), and intracranial bleeding (RR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.26–0.49). For the real-world data, compared with warfarin, NOACs was associated with decreased rates of stroke or systemic embolism (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.68–0.82), ischemic stroke (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59–0.83), myocardial infarction (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58–0.93), all-cause death (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.59–0.77), major bleeding (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.55–0.73), intracranial bleeding (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.43–0.59), and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.51–0.84). The results did not change in the subgroup analyses based on the type and dose of NOACs. Conclusions— Based on published NOAC trials and real-world studies, the use of NOACs is noninferior to warfarin in Asians with atrial fibrillation irrespective of the NOAC type and dose.

Abstract 15090: Direct Oral Anticoagulation vs Vitamin K Antagonist in Atrial Fibrillation With Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud El Iskandarani ◽  
Islam Shatla ◽  
Muhammad Khalid ◽  
Bara El Kurdi ◽  
Timir Paul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Liver Disease ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Background: Current guidelines recommend against the use of direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in the setting of significant liver disease (LD) due to lack of evidence in safety and efficacy studies. However, recently studies have investigated the role of DOAC in comparison to Vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in this category of patients. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this approach. Hypothesis: DOAC is safe and effective compared to VKA in AF with LD patients. Method: Unrestricted search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases performed from inception until June 1, 2020 for studies comparing DOAC with VKA including more than 100 AF patients with LD. Relevant data were extracted and analyzed using Revman 5.3 software. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% Confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the random-effects model. Result: A total of 5 studies (3 retrospective and 2 post hoc analysis) were included examining 39,064 patients with AF and LD (25,398 DOAC vs 13,669 VKA). DOAC is associated with lower risk of major bleeding compared to VKA with a HR of 0.68 (95% CI 0.47-0.98; I 2 =53%), all-cause mortality (HR 0.74;95% CI 0.59-0.94; I 2 =61%), and intracranial bleeding (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.40-0.58; I 2 =0). There was no significant difference in ischemic stroke risk (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.47-1.14; I 2 =72%) and gastrointestinal bleeding risk (0.96; 95% CI 0.61-1.51; I 2 =41%) between DOAC and VKA. Conclusion: DOAC is non-inferior to VKA regarding ischemic stroke prevention in AF patients with LD. Moreover, DOAC is associated with a lower risk of major bleeding, intracranial bleeding and all-cause mortality. Further randomized trials are needed to validate our findings.

Dabigatran in real-world atrial fibrillation

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (10) ◽  
pp. 754-763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Moscoso Costa ◽  
Jorge Ferreira ◽  
Miguel Mendes ◽  
João Carmo
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Real World ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Intracranial Bleeding ◽  
Gi Bleeding ◽  
Stroke Incidence ◽  
Significant Difference

SummaryIn the RE-LY clinical trial, dabigatran presented a better effectiveness/ safety profile when compared to warfarin. However, clinical trials are not very representative of the real-world setting. We aimed to assess the performance of dabigatran in real-world patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) by means of a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational comparison studies with vitamin K antagonists (VKA). We searched PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases until November 2015 and selected studies according to the following criteria: observational study performed with nonvalvular AF patients; reporting adjusted hazard ratios (HR) of clinical events in a follow-up period; for dabigatran 75 mg, 110 mg or 150 mg versus VKA. Twenty studies were selected which included 711,298 patients, 210,279 of which were treated with dabigatran and the remaining 501,019 with VKA. Ischaemic stroke incidence was of 1.65 /100 patient-years for dabigatran and 2.85/100 patient-years for VKA (HR 0.86, 95 % confidence interval of 0.74–0.99). Major bleeding rate was 3.93/100 patient-years for dabigatran and 5.61/100 patient-years for VKA (0.79, 0.69–0.89). Risk of mortality (0.73, 0.61–0.87) and intracranial bleeding (0.45, 0.38–0.52) were significantly lower in patients treated with dabigatran when compared to patients on VKA. Risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding was significantly higher in patients treated with dabigatran (1.13, 1.00–1.28). No significant difference was observed in risk of myocardial infarction (0.99, 0.89–1.11). In this combined analysis of real-world observational comparison studies with VKA, dabigatran was associated with a lower risk of ischaemic stroke, major bleeding, intracranial bleeding and mortality, higher risk of GI bleeding and a similar risk of myocardial infarction.Supplementary Material to this article is available online at www.thrombosis-online.com.

Efficacy and Safety of Nonvitamin K Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Cancer: A Study-Level Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 120 (02) ◽  
pp. 314-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilaria Cavallari ◽  
Giuseppe Verolino ◽  
Silvio Romano ◽  
Giuseppe Patti
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Intracranial Bleeding ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Patients With Cancer

Abstract Objectives In this study-level meta-analysis, we evaluated the clinical outcome with nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with cancer. Background Anticoagulation in AF patients with cancer is challenging given the coexistence of elevated thrombotic and bleeding risk. The efficacy and safety of NOACs in this setting remain unclear. Methods We included three randomized trials in our primary analysis (N = 2,661 patients) and three observational studies in our secondary, confirmatory analysis (N = 21,112 patients). Outcome measures were: the composite of any stroke or systemic embolism, ischemic stroke, venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, intracranial bleeding; and all-cause death. Mean follow-up duration was 2.2 years. Results In the primary analysis, the use of NOACs was associated with similar incidence of stroke/systemic embolism (odds ratio [OR] 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.45–1.09; p = 0.11), ischemic stroke (OR 0.71, 0.31–1.64; p = 0.42), venous thromboembolism (OR 0.91, 0.33–2.53; p = 0.86), all-cause death (OR 1.02, 0.72–1.42; p = 0.93), and major bleeding (OR 0.81, 0.61–1.06; p = 0.13) compared with VKAs. The occurrence of intracranial bleeding was significantly lower in the NOACs versus VKAs group (OR 0.11, 0.02–0.63; p = 0.01). These results were overall confirmed in the secondary analysis, where there was additionally a significant reduction of stroke/systemic embolism, ischemic stroke, and venous thromboembolism with NOACs. Conclusion In AF patients with malignancy, NOACs appear at least as effective as VKAs in preventing thrombotic events and reduce intracranial bleeding. NOACs may represent a valid and more practical alternative to VKAs in this setting of high-risk patients.

P4758Label adherence of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: A nationwide study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H T Yu ◽  
P S Yang ◽  
E Jang ◽  
T H Kim ◽  
J S Uhm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Dose adjustment of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is indicated in some patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), based on selected patient factors or concomitant medications. Purpose We assessed the frequency of label adherence of NOAC dosing among AF patients and the associations between off-label NOAC dosing and clinical outcomes in real-world clinical practice. Methods We evaluated 53,649 AF patients treated with a NOAC using Korean National Health Insurance Service database during the period from January 2013 to December 2016. NOAC doses were classified as either underdosed or overdosed, consistent with U.S. Food and Drug Administration labeling. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to investigate the effectiveness and safety outcomes including stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality. Results Overall, 16,757 NOAC-treated patients (31.2%) were underdosed, 4,492 were overdosed (8.4%), and 32,400 (60.4%) were dosed appropriately according to drug labeling. Compared with patients with label adherence, those who were underdosed or overdosed were older (71±8 and 75±7 years of age vs. 70±9 years of age, respectively; p<0.001), more likely female (39% and 53% vs. 38%, respectively; p<0.001), and had higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores (4.6±1.7 and 5.3±1.7 vs. 4.5±1.8, respectively; p<0.001). NOAC overdosing was associated with increased risk for stroke or systemic embolism (5.76 vs. 4.03 events/100 patient-years, p<0.001), major bleeding (4.77 vs. 2.94 events/100 patient-years, p<0.001), and all-cause mortality (5.43 vs. 3.05 events/100 patient-years, p<0.001) compared with label-adherent use. Figure 1 Conclusion In routine clinical practice, a significant proportion (almost 2 in 5) of AF patients received NOAC doses inconsistent with drug labeling. NOAC overdosing is associated with increased risk for stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality in Asian patient with AF.

scholarly journals Impact of oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation at very low thromboembolic risk

Heart ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 845-851
Author(s):  
Frederik Hendrik Verbrugge ◽  
Anne-Céline Martin ◽  
Deborah Siegal ◽  
Karen Pieper ◽  
Laura Illingworth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Haemorrhagic Stroke ◽  
Inverse Association ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Bleeding Events ◽  
Thromboembolic Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality

ObjectiveTo investigate reasons for and impact of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at very low thromboembolic risk.MethodsIndividuals with CHA2DS2-VASc score 0 (men) or 1 (women) from the Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation (GARFIELD-AF) were studied. Baseline characteristics according to OAC use were evaluated by logistic regression analysis. Non-haemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality were compared.ResultsFrom 2224 low CHA2DS2-VASc patients in GARFIELD-AF, 44% received OAC. In an adjusted model, increasing age up to 65 years (OR (95% CI)=1.31 (1.19 to 1.44)) and persistent AF (OR (95% CI)=3.25 (2.44 to 4.34)) or permanent AF (OR (95% CI)=2.29 (1.59 to 3.30)) versus paroxysmal/unclassified AF were associated with OAC use. Concomitant antiplatelet therapy (OR (95% CI)=0.21 (0.17 to 0.27)) was inversely associated. Crude incidence rates per 100 person-years over 2 years in patients on OAC versus not on OAC were 0.32 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.71) vs 0.30 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.63) for non-haemorrhagic stroke or systemic embolism, 0.21 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.57) vs 0.17 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.46) for major bleeding, 0.26 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.64) vs 0.26 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.57) for cardiovascular mortality and 0.74 (95% CI 0.44 to 1.25) vs 0.99 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.49) for all-cause mortality.ConclusionsIn contrast to guideline recommendations, almost half of real-world patients with AF at a very low thromboembolic risk according to the CHA2DS2-VASc score receive OAC. Persistent or permanent AF and increasing age up to 65 years are associated with OAC use, while concomitant antiplatelet therapy shows an inverse association. Regardless whether patients received OAC therapy, few thromboembolic and bleeding events occur, highlighting the low risk of this population.

scholarly journals Reappraisal of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuwei Liu ◽  
Yunyao Yang ◽  
Winglam Cheng ◽  
Jianyong Ma ◽  
Wengen Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonist ◽  
Systemic Embolism

Background: Recent observational studies have compared effectiveness and safety profiles between non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Nevertheless, the confounders may exist due to the nature of clinical practice-based data, thus potentially influencing the reliability of results. This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the effect of NOACs with warfarin based on the propensity score-based observational studies vs. randomized clinical trials (RCTs).Methods: Articles included were systematically searched from the PubMed and EMBASE databases until March 2021 to obtain relevant studies. The primary outcomes were stroke or systemic embolism (SSE) and major bleeding. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the outcomes were extracted and then pooled by the random-effects model.Results: A total of 20 propensity score-based observational studies and 4 RCTs were included. Compared with warfarin, dabigatran (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.71–0.96]), rivaroxaban (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.75–0.85]), apixaban (HR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.65–0.86]), and edoxaban (HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.60–0.83]) were associated with a reduced risk of stroke or systemic embolism, whereas dabigatran (HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.65–0.87]), apixaban (HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.56–0.67]), and edoxaban (HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.45–0.74]) but not rivaroxaban (HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.84–1.00]) were significantly associated with a decreased risk of major bleeding based on the observational studies. Furthermore, the risk of major bleeding with dabigatran 150 mg was significantly lower in observational studies than that in the RE-LY trial, whereas the pooled results of observational studies were similar to the data from the corresponding RCTs in other comparisons.Conclusion: Data from propensity score-based observational studies and NOAC trials consistently suggest that the use of four individual NOACs is non-inferior to warfarin for stroke prevention in AF patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document