scholarly journals Global longitudinal strain at baseline is a marker of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 2718-2718
Author(s):  
N. Hasselberg ◽  
A. Brunet ◽  
K. H. Haugaa ◽  
E. Kongsgaard ◽  
E. Donal ◽  
...  
Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhupendar Tayal ◽  
Antonia Delgado-Montero ◽  
Akiko Goda ◽  
Samir Saba ◽  
Niels Risum ◽  
...  

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) patients have an increased risk for ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and in particular patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) have a worse prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) compared with non-ischemic patients. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that global longitudinal strain (GLS) at baseline has the ability to identify ICM patients at higher risk for VA after CRT-D. Methods: We prospectively studied 175 consecutive HF patients implanted with CRT-D from a single center. All of them had class II-IV HF symptoms, LV ejection fraction (≤35%), QRS≥120 ms. GLS was measured from the three standard apical views and presented as absolute values. Outcome event was defined as VA (anti-tachycardia pacing or appropriate shock) after CRT in the first 2 years of follow-up. Results: Of 175 patients aged 65±11 years, 135 (77%) were male and 115 (66%) had ICM. They suffered 34 (19%) VA events over 2 years. Mean GLS of the population was 8.1±3.0. GLS (< 6.5%) was associated with VA events after CRT-D with a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 56%. A cutoff of GLS<6.5% was associated with greater VA events in the ICM patients with HR 2.92 (95% confidence interval 1.48 to 5.77, p=0.002). A similar significant association of GLS was not seen in the non ICM patients (p=0.12). Conclusions: Low GLS (<6.5% in absolute values) in ICM patients is associated with increased risk for VA after CRT-D and might represent more extensive myocardial scarring and has prognostic implications.


Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amira Zaroui ◽  
Patricia Reant ◽  
Erwan Donal ◽  
Aude Mignot ◽  
Pierre Bordachar ◽  
...  

In some patients, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been recently shown to induce a spectacular effect on left ventricular (LV) function and inverted remodeling with nearby normalization of LV contraction. Objectives: To analyze and characterize super-responders (CRTSR) by echocardiography before CRT. 186 patients have been investigated before and 6 months after implantation of a CRT device with conventional indication according to ESC guidelines. Echocardiographies including measurements of LV dimensions, and contraction by 2-dimensional strain, and pressure assessment, mitral valve analysis were performed at baseline and at 6 months in an independent core-center lab. CRTSR were defined as a reduction of end-systolic volume of at least 15% and an ejection fraction (EF)>50% and were compared to normal responder patients (CRTNo, patients with a reduction of end-systolic volume of at least 15% but an EF <50%). 17/186 patients (9.1%) were identified as CRTSR, only 2 with ischemic cardiomyopathy (p<0.01). No difference was observed regarding NYHA status, EKG duration or EF between CRTSR and CRTNo at baseline. CRTSR presented with significant lower end-diastolic and end-systolic diameters (64±9mm vs 73±9mm (p<0.01) and 53±7.4mm vs 63±8.4mm (p<0.01), respectively), and end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes 161±44ml vs 210±76ml (p<0.02) and 123±43ml vs 163±69ml (p<0.01)) as well as a higher LV dP/dt max (714±251mmHg.s −1 vs 527±188 mmHg.s −1 (p<0.05)). Regarding strain analysis, CRTSR had significantly higher longitudinal values than CRTNo (−12.8±3% vs −9±2.6%, p<0.001) whereas no difference was observed for other components (p ns). Global longitudinal strain obtained by ROC curves was identified as the best parameter for predicting CRTSR with a cut-off value of −11% (Se=80%, Spe=87%, AUC=0.89, p<0.002) and was confirmed as an independent predictor by the logistic regression (RR: 21.3, p<0.0001). In a large multicenter study, CRT super-responders (EF>50%) were observed in 9% of the population and were associated with less-depressed LV function as determined by strain analysis. Global longitudinal strain appears to be the best predictor of CRTSR.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 1112-1119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pieter van der Bijl ◽  
Marina V Kostyukevich ◽  
Mand Khidir ◽  
Nina Ajmone Marsan ◽  
Victoria Delgado ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can reduce left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), and a decrease of ≥15% is defined as a response. CRT can also improve LV global longitudinal strain (GLS). Changes in LVESV and LV GLS are individually associated with outcome post-CRT. We investigated LVESV and LV GLS changes and prognostic implications of improvement in LVESV and/or LV GLS, compared with no improvement in either parameter. Methods and results Baseline and 6-month echocardiograms were analysed from CRT recipients with heart failure. LV reverse remodelling was defined as a ≥15% reduction in LVESV at 6 months post-CRT. A ≥5% absolute improvement in LV GLS was defined as a change in LV GLS. A total of 1185 patients were included (mean age 65 ± 10 years, 73% male), and those with an improvement in LVESV and LV GLS (n = 131, 11.1%) had significantly lower mortality compared with other groups. On multivariable analysis, an improvement in both LVESV and LV GLS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.47; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31–0.71; P < 0.001] or an improvement in either LVESV or LV GLS (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.47–0.71; P < 0.001) were independently associated with better prognosis, compared with no improvement in either parameter. Conclusion Either a reduction in LVESV and/or an improvement in LV GLS at 6 months post-CRT are independently associated with improved long-term prognosis, compared with no change in both LVESV and LV GLS. This supports the use of LV GLS as a meaningful parameter in defining CRT response.


Heart Rhythm ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. S446
Author(s):  
Radu-Gabriel M. Vatasescu ◽  
Silvia Deaconu ◽  
Alina Scarlatescu ◽  
Ioana Petre ◽  
Gabriela Marascu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document