P3371Impact of severe aortic stenosis on layer-specific longitudinal strain and its prognostic value

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Ilardi ◽  
R E Dulgheru ◽  
S Marchetta ◽  
S Cimino ◽  
G D'Amico ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Myocardial Dysfunction ◽  
Global Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Left Atrial Volume ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Myocardial Layers

Abstract Background Global longitudinal strain (GLS) was used to detect early myocardial dysfunction in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), however few data are currently available on the different susceptibility of specific myocardial layer to increased wall stress and its prognostic role. The present study sought to investigate the relationship between changes in LV multilayer strain and the clinical outcome of patients with severe AS and preserved left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods We included in the analysis 211 patients (56% males, mean age 73±12 years old) with severe AS and LVEF≥50%, divided in symptomatic (n=114) and asymptomatic group (n=97), and 50 controls matched for age and sex. Patients with moderate-to-severe concomitant valvulopathy and inadequate acoustic windows for evaluation by speckle tracking analysis were excluded. Clinical, demographic and resting echocardiographic data were recorded, including quantification of 2D GLS, subendocardial LS and subepicardial LS. Results Symptomatic patients had increased LV wall thickness and LV mass index than asymptomatic ones (p<0.001), higher transaortic mean pressure gradients (48±14 vs 44±13 mmHg, p=0.004), and lower aortic valve areas (0.42±0.09 vs 0.45±0.08 cm2/m2, p<0.017). GLS was significantly lower in patients with AS compared to controls, especially in symptomatic group (17.9±3.4 vs 19.1±3.1 vs 20.7±2.1%, p<0.001 in symptomatic, asymptomatic and control groups respectively) suggesting an early, subtle, myocardial dysfunction. In particular, the analysis of layer-specific myocardial deformation revealed a marked difference in both the subendocardial LS (20.1±4.9 vs 21.7±4.2 vs 23.4±2.5%, p<0.001) and subepicardial LS (15.8±3.1 vs 16.8±2.8 vs 18.3±1.8%, p<0.001). At multivariable logistic regression analysis, subendocardial LS was independently associated to symptoms (OR=1.148, p=0.014), together with indexed left atrial volume (OR=1.035, p=0.007) and LV concentric remodelling (OR=2.429, p=0.031). During a mean follow up of 38 months (IQ range 18–60 months), 12 patients with asymptomatic severe AS had a cardiovascular (CV) death. The presence of a subendocardial LS <22% at baseline was associated with a higher rate of CV events at 3 and 5-year follow-up (19% vs 5% at 3-year follow-up, and 22% vs 8% at 5-year follow-up, respectively; log-rank p=0.044). Conclusion In patients with severe AS, LS impairment involves all myocardial layers and is more prominent in the advanced phases of the disease. In this setting, the subendocardial LS appears to be independently associated to symptoms than subepicardial LS. In asymptomatic patients, a reduced value of subendocardial LS is associated with higher CV mortality at 3- and 5-year follow-up.

Segmentally impaired left ventricular longitudinal strain: a new predictive diagnostic parameter for asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction

Perfusion ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 026765912199599
Author(s):  
Peggy M Kostakou ◽  
Elsie S Tryfou ◽  
Vassilios S Kostopoulos ◽  
Lambros I Markos ◽  
Dimitrios S Damaskos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricle ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Global Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Average Strain ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: This study aims to investigate the correlation between severe aortic stenosis (sAS) and impairment of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) in particular segments, using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in patients with sAS and normal ejection fraction of left ventricle (LVEF). Methods: The study included 53 consecutive patients with asymptomatic sAS and preserved LVEF. The regional longitudinal systolic LV wall strain was evaluated at the area opposite of the aorta as the median strain value of the basal, middle, and apical segments of the lateral and posterior walls and was compared to the average strain value of the interventricular septum (IVS) at the same views. Results: LVGLS was decreased and was not statistically different between three- and four-chamber views (−12.5 ± 3.6 vs −11.4 ± 5.5%, p = 0.2). The average strain values of the lateral and posterior walls were statistically reduced compared to the average value of the IVS (lateral vs IVS: −7.8 ± 3.7 vs −10 ± 5.3%, p = 0.005, posterior vs IVS: −7.7 ± 4.2 vs −10.3 ± 3.8%, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between lateral and posterior walls (−7.8 ± 3.7 vs −7.7 ± 4.2%, p = 0.9). Conclusions: The strain of lateral and posterior walls of left ventricle, which lay just opposite to the aortic valve seem to be more reduced compared to other walls in patients with sAS and preserved LVEF possibly due to their anatomical position. This impairment seems to be the reason of the overall LVGLS reduction. Regional strain could be used as an extra tool for the estimation of the severity of AS as well as for prognostic information in asymptomatic patients.

481Right ventricular longitudinal strain predicts symptoms in patients with chronic primary mitral regurgitation

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A L Chilingaryan ◽  
L G Tunyan ◽  
K G Adamyan
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Global Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Lv Ejection Fraction ◽  
Primary Mitral Regurgitation

Abstract Mitral regurgitation (MR) leads to subclinical changes that often cannot be detected by low sensitive conventional parameters and early predictors of deterioration could suggest a better timing for intervention. Methods We follow up 175 asymptomatic patients 56±13 years (79 female) with severe primary MR in sinus rhythm and without diabetes mellitus and renal disease for 2 years. Global longitudinal strain (LS) of left ventricle (LVGLS), right ventricular (RV) free wall LS (RVLS), and left atrial (LA) peak reservoir LS as average of two basal segments in 4 chamber view were measured by speckle tracking along with indexes of LV end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes, LV ejection fraction (EF), left atrial end-systolic volume index (LAVi) every 6 months. Normal reference values of LS were obtained from age and sex matched 40 healthy controls. Results Patients with MR had higher LV ejection fraction (EF), LVGLS, LALS and lower values of RVLS compared with controls (EF 67.4±5% vs 59.3±4%, p<0.05; LVGLS –25.2±2.3% vs –21.2±1.9%, p<0.03; LALS 46.2±5.1% vs 42.4±3.7%, p<0.04; RVLS –23.4±5.1% vs –27.3±2.8%, p<0.03). 53 (30%) patients developed symptoms at exercise during follow up. Symptomatic patients at baseline had higher values of RVLS compared with patients who remained asymptomatic during follow up without significant differences in EF, LVGLS, LALS (RVLS –21.4±2.6% vs –25.8±3.2%, p<0.02; EF 66.8±2.4% vs 68.1±3.1%, p>0.05; LVGLS –24.8±2.1% vs –25.3±2.3%, p>0.05; LALS 45.7±4.1% vs 46.5±4.4%, p>0.05). RVLS correlated with LAVi (r=0.53, p<0.01) and LALS (r=0.57, p<0.01). Regression analysis defined RVLS as an independent predictor of symptoms development (OR=3.2; 95% CI=1.37–7.63; p<0.01). Conclusion RV longitudinal strain predicts symptoms in patients with chronic primary mitral regurgitation.

scholarly journals CORRELATION OF AVERAGE 4D-CT BASED STRAIN ASSESSMENT (SQUEEZ) WITH GLOBAL LONGITUDINAL STRAIN BY ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY IN INDIVIDUALS WITH SEVERE AORTIC STENOSIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 1265
Author(s):  
Christopher Smitson ◽  
Anthony DeMaria ◽  
Sachiyo Igata ◽  
Gabrielle Colvert ◽  
Francisco Contijoch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Global Longitudinal Strain ◽  
4D Ct

scholarly journals Late Gadolinium Enhancement Predicts Improvement in Global Longitudinal Strain after Aortic Valve Replacement in Aortic Stenosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsuyoshi Fujimiya ◽  
Masumi Iwai-Takano ◽  
Takashi Igarashi ◽  
Hiroharu Shinjo ◽  
Keiichi Ishida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Late Gadolinium Enhancement ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Global Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Lv Function ◽  
Gadolinium Enhancement

Abstract Myocardial fibrosis, as detected by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is related to mortality after aortic valve replacement (AVR). This study aimed to determine whether LGEMRI predicts improvement in global longitudinal strain (GLS) after AVR in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Twenty-nine patients with severe AS who were scheduled to undergo AVR were enrolled. Two-dimensional echocardiography and contrast-enhanced MRI were performed before AVR. GLS and LGEcore (g: > 5 SD of normal area), LGEgray (g: 2–5 SD), and LGEcore+gray (g) were measured. One year after AVR, GLS were examined by echocardiography to assess improvement in LV function. Preoperatively, GLS correlated with LGEcore (g) (r2 = 0.14, p < 0.05), LGEgray (g) (r2 = 0.32, p < 0.01) and LGEcore+gray (g) (r2 = 0.36, p < 0.01). LGEcore was significantly lower in patients with improved GLS after AVR (GLS1year ≥ −19.9%) compared to those with no improvement (1.34 g vs. 4.70 g, p < 0.01). LGE predicts improvement in LV systolic function after AVR.

scholarly journals P818 Association between baseline left ventricular longitudinal strain and follow-up left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
I H Jung ◽  
Y S Byun ◽  
J H Park
Keyword(s):  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Myocardial Dysfunction ◽  
Global Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Reverse Remodeling ◽  
Lv Function ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements no Background Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) offers sensitive and reproducible measurement of myocardial dysfunction. The authors sought to evaluate whether LV GLS at the time of diagnosis may predict LV reverse remodeling (LVRR) in DCM patients with sinus rhythm and also investigate the relationship between baseline LV GLS and follow-up LVEF. Methods We enrolled patients with DCM who had been initially diagnosed, evaluated, and followed at our institute. Results During the mean follow-up duration of 37.3 ± 21.7 months, LVRR occurred in 28% of patients (n = 45) within 14.7 ± 10.0 months of medical therapy. The initial LV ejection fraction (LVEF) of patients who recovered LV function was 26.1 ± 7.9% and was not different from the value of 27.1 ± 7.4% (p = 0.49) of those who did not recover. There was a moderate and highly significant correlation between baseline LV GLS and follow-up LVEF (r = 0.717; p &lt;0.001). Conclusion There was a significant correlation between baseline LV GLS and follow-up LVEF in this population. Baseline Follow-up Difference (95% CI) p-value All patients (n = 160) LVEDDI, mm/m2 35.6 ± 6.6 35.6 ± 6.6 -2.7 (-3.4 to -2.0) &lt;0.001 LVESDI, mm/m2 30.3 ± 6.1 26.6 ± 6.6 -3.7 (-4.6 to -2.8) &lt;0.001 LVEDVI, mL/m2 95.0 ± 30.7 74.3 ± 30.2 -20.7 (-25.6 to -15.8) &lt;0.001 LVESVI, mL/m2 70.0 ± 24.8 50.2 ± 26.8 -19.8 (-24.2 to -15.4) &lt;0.001 LVEF, % 26.8 ± 7.5 33.9 ± 12.6 7.2 (5.2 to 9.2) &lt;0.001 LV GLS (-%) 9.2 ± 3.1 11.0 ± 4.8 1.8 (1.3 to 2.2) &lt;0.001 Patients without LVRR (n = 115) LVEDDI, mm/m2 34.9 ± 6.8 34.1 ± 6.8 -0.8 (-1.3 to -0.3) 0.002 LVESDI, mm/m2 29.5 ± 6.1 28.4 ± 6.4 -1.4 (-1.8 to -0.4) 0.002 LVEDVI, mL/m2 92.0 ± 30.5 83.4 ± 29.8 -8.6 (-12.4 to -4.8) &lt;0.001 LVESVI, mL/m2 67.1 ± 24.4 59.5 ± 25.3 -7.6 (-10.9 to -4.3) &lt;0.001 LVEF, % 27.1 ± 7.4 27.8 ± 7.4 0.7 (-0.2 to 1.6) 0.126 LV GLS (-%) 8.2 ± 2.9 8.7 ± 3.2 0.5 (0.7 to 3.6) &lt;0.001 Patients with LVRR (n = 45) LVEDDI, mm/m2 37.4 ± 5.5 29.8 ± 5.2 -7.5 (-9.1 to -6.0) &lt;0.001 LVESDI, mm/m2 32.2 ± 5.7 21.9 ± 4.4 -10.3 (-11.9 to -8.6) &lt;0.001 LVEDVI, mL/m2 102.7 ± 30.2 51.1 ± 15.0 -51.7 (-61.6 to -41.7) &lt;0.001 LVESVI, mL/m2 77.3 ± 24.5 26.4 ± 11.3 -50.9 (-58.8 to -43.1) &lt;0.001 LVEF, % 26.1 ± 7.9 49.4 ± 9.5 23.9 (20.4 to 27.5) &lt;0.001 LV GLS (-%) 11.9 ± 1.6 16.9 ± 2.7 5.1 (4.2 to 5.9) &lt;0.001 Baseline and Follow-up LV Functional Echocardiographic Data Abstract P818 Figure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document