Segmentally impaired left ventricular longitudinal strain: a new predictive diagnostic parameter for asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction

Perfusion ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 026765912199599
Author(s):  
Peggy M Kostakou ◽  
Elsie S Tryfou ◽  
Vassilios S Kostopoulos ◽  
Lambros I Markos ◽  
Dimitrios S Damaskos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricle ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Global Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Average Strain ◽  
Asymptomatic Patients ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction: This study aims to investigate the correlation between severe aortic stenosis (sAS) and impairment of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) in particular segments, using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in patients with sAS and normal ejection fraction of left ventricle (LVEF). Methods: The study included 53 consecutive patients with asymptomatic sAS and preserved LVEF. The regional longitudinal systolic LV wall strain was evaluated at the area opposite of the aorta as the median strain value of the basal, middle, and apical segments of the lateral and posterior walls and was compared to the average strain value of the interventricular septum (IVS) at the same views. Results: LVGLS was decreased and was not statistically different between three- and four-chamber views (−12.5 ± 3.6 vs −11.4 ± 5.5%, p = 0.2). The average strain values of the lateral and posterior walls were statistically reduced compared to the average value of the IVS (lateral vs IVS: −7.8 ± 3.7 vs −10 ± 5.3%, p = 0.005, posterior vs IVS: −7.7 ± 4.2 vs −10.3 ± 3.8%, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between lateral and posterior walls (−7.8 ± 3.7 vs −7.7 ± 4.2%, p = 0.9). Conclusions: The strain of lateral and posterior walls of left ventricle, which lay just opposite to the aortic valve seem to be more reduced compared to other walls in patients with sAS and preserved LVEF possibly due to their anatomical position. This impairment seems to be the reason of the overall LVGLS reduction. Regional strain could be used as an extra tool for the estimation of the severity of AS as well as for prognostic information in asymptomatic patients.

Myocardial work in Stage 1 and 2 hypertensive patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akshar Jaglan ◽  
Sarah Roemer ◽  
Ana Cristina Perez Moreno ◽  
Bijoy K Khandheria
Keyword(s):  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Global Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Hypertensive Patients ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lv Ejection Fraction ◽  
Global Work ◽  
Stage 1

Abstract Aims Myocardial work (MW) is a novel parameter that can be used in a clinical setting to assess left ventricular (LV) pressures and deformation. We sought to distinguish patterns of global MW index in hypertensive vs. non-hypertensive patients and to look at differences between categories of hypertension. Methods and results Sixty-five hypertensive patients (mean age 65 ± 13 years; 30 male) and 15 controls (mean age 38 ± 12 years; 7 male) underwent transthoracic echocardiography at rest. Hypertensive patients were subdivided into Stage 1 (n = 32) and Stage 2 (n = 33) hypertension based on 2017 American College of Cardiology guidelines. Exclusion criteria were suboptimal image quality for myocardial deformation analysis, reduced ejection fraction, valvular heart disease, intracardiac shunt, and arrhythmia. Global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW), and global work efficiency were estimated from LV pressure–strain loops utilizing proprietary software from speckle-tracking echocardiography. LV systolic and diastolic pressures were estimated using non-invasive brachial artery cuff pressure. Global longitudinal strain and LV ejection fraction were preserved between the groups with no statistically significant difference, whereas there was a statically significant difference between the control and two hypertension groups in GWI (P = 0.01), GCW (P &lt; 0.001), and GWW (P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion Non-invasive MW analysis allows better understanding of LV response under conditions of increased afterload. MW is an advanced assessment of LV systolic function in hypertension patients, giving a closer look at the relationship between LV pressure and contractility in settings of increased load dependency than LV ejection fraction and global longitudinal strain.

scholarly journals 665 Longitudinal strain impairment in organic mitral regurgitation: look beyond the valve

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Diana ◽  
Laura Manfredonia ◽  
Monica Filice ◽  
Emanuele Ravenna ◽  
Francesca Graziani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitral Regurgitation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Global Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Damage ◽  
Lv Dysfunction ◽  
Lv Mass ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lv Ejection Fraction

Abstract Aims Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a hallmark of cardiac damage in mitral regurgitation (MR). GLS &gt; −18% in patients with severe organic MR (OMR) and normal LV ejection fraction (LVEF) is an independent predictor of postoperative LV dysfunction. While it is known that GLS is impaired in less than severe functional ischaemic MR (FMR), the value of GLS in less than severe OMR is not known. We aimed to determine prevalence and determinants of any GLS impairment in OMR, in comparison to FMR. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 51 consecutive patients (33 OMR and 18 FMR) with mild-to-moderate, moderate and moderate-to-severe MR (Table*). Overall, GLS was higher in OMR than FMR (17.9±4.5 vs. 10.3±5.3, P&lt;0.001), with rate of impairment of 45% in OMR and 89% in FMR (P= 0.0024). Results However, no significant difference was found in GLS between mild-to-moderate, moderate and moderate-to-severe MR patients within OMR (17.7±4.7 vs. 16.9±3.9 vs. 22.4±3, respectively, P&gt;0.05), as well as FMR (9.8±6.6 vs. 10.7±5.3 vs. 10.4±5.3, respectively, P&gt;0.05) groups. GLS correlated directly with left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) in both OMR (r=0.69, P&lt;0.001) and FMR (r=0.90, P&lt;0.001), and inversely with LV mass indexed for body surface area (LVMi) in both OMR (r = −0.50, P=0.005) and FMR (r = −0.48, P=0.042). While correlation with LVEF was better for FMR than OMR (Z − 1.95, P=0.026), correlation with LVMi was similar for OMR and FMR groups (Z − 0.082, P&gt;0.05). Conclusions In patients with OMR, GLS may be reduced, despite normal LVEF, in less than severe MR. Prevalence and degree of GLS impairment in OMR is less than in FMR. In OMR, as well as in FMR, GLS impairment is independent of entity of MR, but rather correlates with LVMi, maybe reflecting impact of myocardial fibrosis derived by increased LVMi on GLS.

Left Ventricular Function Assessment by Strain Analysis in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis with Preserved Ejection Fraction Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement – A Prospective Longitudinal Study at a Tertiary Health Care Centre of South India

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (27) ◽  
pp. 2405-2411
Author(s):  
Syed Waleem Pasha ◽  
Narasimha D. Pai ◽  
Padmanabha Kamath ◽  
Ramanatha L. Kamath ◽  
Francis N.P. Monteiro
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Strain Rate ◽  
Valve Replacement ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Global Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Study Population

BACKGROUND Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common, single, native valvular heart disease in adult population. The purpose of this study was to detect abnormalities in global longitudinal strain (GLS) and strain rate using 2D - STI in patients with severe AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The effect of aortic valve replacement (AVR) on changes in strain parameters 30 days after surgery was also analysed. METHODS A total number of 60 patients aged more than 18 years with aortic valve disease scheduled for surgical aortic valve replacement admitted in Department of Cardiology, KMC hospital Mangalore, were included over a period of 18 months from January 2017 to June 2018. RESULTS A total of 60 patients with severe AS, defined by an aortic valve area of < 1 cm², mean transaortic pressure gradient ( P) of > 40 mmHg and maximum aortic velocity (Vmax) of > 4 m/sec were studied. Mean age of the study population was 63.5 years. 60 % of the population were males and 40 % being females. Most common risk factor present in the study population was diabetes mellitus (DM). 83% of the patients in the study population had at least one symptom. Most common symptom with which the patients presented was exertional dyspnoea. All patients had normal left ventricle (LV) cavity dimensions and LVEF prior to surgery with diastolic dysfunction being present in all patients. The LV ejection fraction is not significantly altered. The aortic valve area calculated by continuity equation has significantly increased post AVR with a significant reduction in transaortic peak and means pressure gradients. Mean global longitudinal strain (GLS) improved from -15.1 % to - 16.9 % (P < 0.001) and longitudinal strain rate improved from -0.8 to -0.9/s (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Global longitudinal strain and strain rate can be adequately measured by 2D speckle-tracking imaging and can be used to detect subtle changes of myocardial function in patients with severe AS with preserved LVEF. KEYWORDS Aortic Stenosis, Exertional Dyspnoea, Global Longitudinal Strain, Transaortic Pressure Gradient, Ventricular Hypertrophy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document