P975Safety and clinical outcomes of rotational atherectomy: an eleven-year centre experience

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A R Pereira ◽  
R Cale ◽  
P Santos ◽  
A R Almeida ◽  
A Marques ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Rotational atherectomy (RA) is an adjunctive tool for the management of heavily calcified coronary lesions during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but the clinical outcomes remain unclear. Access site choice is also poorly defined and there is growing evidence that transradial approach (TRA) is associated with lower complications and lower mortality. Objectives To assess the safety and long-term outcomes of RA for calcified coronary lesions and to investigate the influence of vascular access site in the efficacy and safety of the procedure. Methods Retrospective single-centre study that included consecutive PCI with RA performed from January 2006 to December 2017. Endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke and target vessel revascularization, at 1- and 5-year. Results 246 procedures were included in a total of 236 patients (pts): mean age 70.1±9.7 years, 73.6% male; 36.2% had previous PCI, 12.2% vascular peripheral disease (VPD), 24% reduced left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) and 6.9% were under hemodialysis. PCI with RA was mostly performed due to stable angina (48.9%) and via TRA (55.3%), with a total of 371 treated segments and a median number of 1 vessel treated per intervention. The left anterior descending artery was the most frequently treated artery (67.5%). Single burr was used in 76% of cases (mean number of burrs 1.23; mean burr size 1.5 mm). Procedural success rate was 94.7%. Complications were recorded in 9.3%, with no procedure related death. Clinical follow-up was complete in 98.8% of pts at 1-year and 81.3% at 5-year (mean time 62.3±41.8 months). Survival free of MACE at 1- and 5-year were 83.7% and 73.2%, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression identified 6 independent predictors (only 1 protector) for 1-year MACE (Fig. A) and 6 independent predictors (all of increased risk) for 5-year MACE (Fig. B). TRA was protector of 1-year MACE and Kaplan-Meier curves showed benefit for both 1- and 5-year MACE occurrence (Fig. C and D), without significant difference in procedural success (p=0.92) and complications (p=0.45) rate comparing to transfemoral approach. Conclusions RA followed by stenting was a safe procedure with a high immediate success rate but an increased number of long-term cardiovascular events. Some clinical conditions, such as previous PCI, VPD and reduced LVEF, seems to adversely influence the long-term outcome while TRA appears to be protective.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-fu CAO ◽  
Yu-liang MA ◽  
Qi LI ◽  
Jian LIU ◽  
Hong ZHAO ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To compare outcomes of bailout and planned rotational atherectomy (RA) in the treatment of severe calcified coronary lesions.Methods: Data of patients treated with RA from 2017 to 2018 at a single-center registry were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were divided into planned RA and bailout RA groups, data between two groups were compared.Results: A total of 190 patients were included in this study, 138 patients received planned RA and 52 patients received bailout RA. Baseline clinical characteristics had no significant differences between groups. The number of implanted stents and total stents length were similar. But the number of balloon (1.6±0.8 vs. 2.7±1.3, P<0.001), procedure time (83.5±26.2 vs. 100.8±36.4min, P=0.007), fluoroscopy volume (941±482 vs. 1227±872mGy, P=0.012] and contrast amount (237±62 vs. 275±90ml, P=0.003)were all lower in planned RA group. Planned RA had a higher procedural success rate (99.3% vs. 92.3%, P=0.007) and a lower complication incidence (4.3% vs. 17.3%, P=0.009). But the primary outcomes at 3 years (9.2% and 16.6%, log rank p=0.24) had no difference between groups.Conclusions: For severe coronary artery calcification, although planned RA did not improved the long term prognosis compared with bailout RA, but it can improve the immediate procedural success rate, reduce the incidence of complications, the procedure time and the volume of contrast.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-fu CAO ◽  
Yu-liang MA ◽  
Qi LI ◽  
Jian LIU ◽  
Hong ZHAO ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective : To compare outcomes of bailout and planned rotational atherectomy (RA) in the treatment of severe calcified coronary lesions. Methods: Data of patients treated with RA from 2017 to 2018 at a single-center registry were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were divided into planned RA and bailout RA groups, data between two groups were compared. Results: A total of 190 patients were included in this study, 138 patients received planned RA and 52 patients received bailout RA. Baseline clinical characteristics had no significant differences between groups. The number of implanted stents and total stents length were similar. But the number of balloon (1.6±0.8 vs. 2.7±1.3, P <0.001), operation time (83.5±26.2 vs. 100.8±36.4min, P =0.007), fluoroscopy volume (941±482 vs. 1227±872mGy, P =0.012] and contrast amount (237±62 vs. 275±90ml, P =0.003)were all lower in planned RA group. Planned RA had a higher procedural success rate (99.3% vs. 92.3%, P =0.007) and a lower complication incidence (4.3% vs. 17.3%, P =0.009). But the cumulative 3-year incidences of MACE events (9.2% and 16.6%, log rank p 0.24) had no difference between groups. Conclusion: For severe coronary artery calcification, although planned RA did not reduce MACE compared with bailout RA, but it can improve the immediate procedural success rate, reduce the incidence of complications, the operation time and the volume of contrast.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-fu CAO ◽  
Yu-liang MA ◽  
Qi LI ◽  
Jian LIU ◽  
Hong ZHAO ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective : To compare outcomes of bailout and planned rotational atherectomy (RA) in the treatment of severe calcified coronary lesions. Methods: Data of patients treated with RA from 2017 to 2018 at a single-center registry were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were divided into planned RA and bailout RA groups, data between two groups were compared. Results: A total of 190 patients were included in this study, 138 patients received planned RA and 52 patients received bailout RA. Baseline clinical characteristics had no significant differences between groups. The number of implanted stents and total stents length were similar. But the number of balloon (1.6±0.8 vs. 2.7±1.3, P <0.001), operation time (83.5±26.2 vs. 100.8±36.4min, P =0.007), fluoroscopy volume (941±482 vs. 1227±872mGy, P =0.012] and contrast amount (237±62 vs. 275±90ml, P =0.003)were all lower in planned RA group. Planned RA had a higher procedural success rate (99.3% vs. 92.3%, P =0.007) and a lower complication incidence (4.3% vs. 17.3%, P =0.009). But the cumulative 3-year incidences of MACE events (9.2% and 16.6%, log rank p 0.24) had no difference between groups. Conclusion: For severe coronary artery calcification, although planned RA did not reduce MACE compared with bailout RA, but it can improve the immediate procedural success rate, reduce the incidence of complications, the operation time and the volume of contrast. Keywords: severe coronary calcified lesions, planned rotational atherectomy, bailout rotational atherectomy


2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Yohei Sotomi ◽  
◽  
◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

Despite advances in technology, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of severely calcified coronary lesions remains challenging. Rotational atherectomy is one of the current therapeutic options to manage calcified lesions, but has a limited role in facilitating the dilation or stenting of lesions that cannot be crossed or expanded with other PCI techniques due to unfavourable clinical outcome in long-term follow-up. However the results of orbital atherectomy presented in the ORBIT I and ORBIT II trials were encouraging. In addition to these encouraging data, necessity for sufficient lesion preparation before implantation of bioresorbable scaffolds lead to resurgence in the use of atherectomy. This article summarises currently available publications on orbital atherectomy (Cardiovascular Systems Inc.) and compares them with rotational atherectomy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Marine Quillot ◽  
Didier Carrié ◽  
Thibault Lhermusier ◽  
Frédéric Bouisset ◽  
Romain André ◽  
...  

Objective. To determine short-term and mid-term prognosis in patients with calcified ostial coronary lesions who underwent rotational atherectomy (RA). Background. RA was developed to facilitate stenting in complex lesions. Treatment of calcified aortoostial coronary lesions with RA appears to have poorer procedure outcomes than nonostial lesions; yet the literature on this topic is scarce. Methods. Of 498 consecutive patients who underwent RA, a total of 80 (16.1%) presented with aortoostial lesions. A comparative, monocentric study was performed between patients with aortoostial and nonaortoostial stenosis, in a retrospective registry. The primary endpoint was the procedural success rate. Secondary endpoints were the rates of major adverse cardiac and cardiovascular events (MACE) at 30 days and 24 months. Results. The procedural success rate was high and similar in patients with and without ostial lesions (96.3% vs 94.7%, p=0.78), as was the rate of angiographic complications (7.5% vs 8.4%, p=0.80). However, the 30-day mortality rate was significantly higher in the aortoostial group (11.3% vs 4.8%, p=0.04), as was the 24-month rate of MACE (43.8% vs 31.8%, p=0.04). The aortoostial location of the lesion was an independent factor associated with the occurrence of cardiovascular events at 24 months (HR = 1.52, 95% CI, 1.03-2.26, p=0.035). Conclusion. Procedural success and complication rates were similar in patients with and without aortoostial lesions. Despite a poor short- and mid-term prognosis, rotational atherectomy appears to be a feasible and safe treatment option for calcified aortoostial coronary lesions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document