CT coronary angiography in Selected Group of patients with Chest pain of new onset predicts and prevents hospital admissions & Outpatient Clinic referrals

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Cameron ◽  
I Wang ◽  
E Ashikodi ◽  
N Dhir ◽  
Y Raja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Invasive Coronary Angiography ◽  
Outpatient Clinics ◽  
Coronary Angiogram ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Ct Coronary Angiogram

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction NICE (National Institute of Clinical Excellence) guidelines currently recommend the use of CT coronary Angiogram (CTCA) as the initial test to investigate coronary artery disease in patients with new onset of chest pain. Our aim was to evaluate the relationship between the CT coronary angiogram findings on index presentation, and hospital admissions and re-referral to outpatient clinics in following 2 years. Method Data was accrued via a retrospective analysis of electronic medical records at Sunderland Royal Hospital pertaining to patients who presented to the Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinic (RACPC) and underwent CTCA in 2017.Data included: Presentation – Typical & atypical angina Risk factors profile Investigations including ECG, ECHO, CTCA, perfusion scan and invasive coronary angiography Severity of coronary artery lesion on CTCA Hospital admissions or re-referral to outpatient clinics in 2 year follow up Results In the 235 patients studied, mean age was 56 years with 130 (55.5%) men and 195 (82.9%) presented with atypical angina as shown in table. Out of 195 patients with atypical chest pain only 17 (8.7%) were diabetics and most of them 178 (91%) had Coronary Calcium score of 1-400. Most patients (184) underwent CT coronary angiogram with 39 (21%) having normal coronary arteries, 126 (68%) with mild to moderate coronary artery disease and 19 (11%) with severe coronary artery disease. Subsequent assessments with invasive coronary angiography, myocardial perfusion scan and Treadmill exercise did not reveal significant disease warranting coronary revascularization. Patients with normal or mild -moderate CAD on CTCA 24 (15%) represented with acute chest pain (only one needed PCI) and 6 (3.5%) were referred to outpatient clinics over 2 years follow up. In patients with severe CAD on CTCA, 6 (32%) presented with acute chest pain and 4 (21%) needed PCI. Almost all patients were treated with statins and antiplatelets following CTCA results. Conclusion CT coronary angiography is sensitive and specific in assessment of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease in non-diabetic patients presenting with angina in outpatient setting. CTCA in patients with normal or mild to moderate CAD also gives confidence to the clinician and prevents further un-necessary investigation and hospital admissions/outpatient referrals.

scholarly journals Detection of relevant extracardiac findings on coronary computed tomography angiography vs. invasive coronary angiography

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominik Laskowski ◽  
Sarah Feger ◽  
Maria Bosserdt ◽  
Elke Zimmermann ◽  
Mahmoud Mohamed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Computed Tomography Angiography ◽  
Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography ◽  
Invasive Coronary Angiography ◽  
Potential Clinical Benefit ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Objectives To compare the detection of relevant extracardiac findings (ECFs) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and evaluate the potential clinical benefit of their detection. Methods This is the prespecified subanalysis of ECFs in patients presenting with a clinical indication for ICA based on atypical angina and suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) included in the prospective single-center randomized controlled Coronary Artery Disease Management (CAD-Man) study. ECFs requiring immediate therapy and/or further workup including additional imaging were defined as clinically relevant. We evaluated the scope of ECFs in 329 patients and analyzed the potential clinical benefit of their detection. Results ECFs were detected in 107 of 329 patients (32.5%; CTA: 101/167, 60.5%; ICA: 6/162, 3.7%; p < .001). Fifty-nine patients had clinically relevant ECFs (17.9%; CTA: 55/167, 32.9%; ICA: 4/162, 2.5%; p < .001). In the CTA group, ECFs potentially explained atypical chest pain in 13 of 101 patients with ECFs (12.9%). After initiation of therapy, chest pain improved in 4 (4.0%) and resolved in 7 patients (6.9%). Follow-up imaging was recommended in 33 (10.0%; CTA: 30/167, 18.0%; ICA: 3/162, 1.9%) and additional clinic consultation in 26 patients (7.9%; CTA: 25/167, 15.0%; ICA: 1/162, 0.6%). Malignancy was newly diagnosed in one patient (0.3%; CTA: 1/167, 0.6%; ICA: 0). Conclusions In this randomized study, CTA but not ICA detected clinically relevant ECFs that may point to possible other causes of chest pain in patients without CAD. Thus, CTA might preclude the need for ICA in those patients. Trial registration NCT Unique ID: 00844220 Key Points • CTA detects ten times more clinically relevant ECFs than ICA. • Actionable clinically relevant ECFs affect patient management and therapy and may thus improve chest pain. • Detection of ECFs explaining chest pain on CTA might preclude the need for performing ICA.

scholarly journals Diagnostic and prognostic value of coronary artery calcium score of zero: is it time for guidelines to change?

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Arbas Redondo ◽  
D Tebar Marquez ◽  
I.D Poveda Pinedo ◽  
R Dalmau Gonzalez-Gallarza ◽  
S.C Valbuena Lopez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Coronary Artery Calcium ◽  
Cardiac Ct ◽  
Invasive Coronary Angiography ◽  
Agatston Score ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Artery Disease

Abstract Introduction Cardiac computed tomography (CT) use has progressively increased as the preferred initial test to rule out coronary artery disease (CAD) when clinical likelihood is low. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) detected by CT is a well-established marker for cardiovascular risk. However, it is not recommended for diagnosis of obstructive CAD. Absence of CAC, defined as an Agatston score of zero, has been associated to good prognosis despite underestimation of non-calcified plaques. Purpose To evaluate whether zero CAC score could help ruling out obstructive CAD in a safely manner. Methods Observational study based on a prospective database of patients (pts) referred to cardiac CT between 2017 and 2019. Pts with an Agatston score of zero were selected. Results We included 176 pts with zero CAC score and non-invasive coronary angiography performed. The median duration of follow-up was 23.9 months. Baseline characteristics of the population are shown in Table 1. In 117 pts (66.5%), cardiac CT was indicated as part of their chest pain evaluation. Mean age was 57.2 years old, 68.2% were women and only and 9.4% were active smokers. Normal coronary arteries were found in 173 pts (98.3%). Obstructive CAD, defined as ≥50% luminal diameter stenosis of a major vessel, was present in 1/176 (0.6%); while non-obstructive atherosclerotic plaques were found in 2 pts (1.1%). During follow-up, one patient died of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. None either suffered from myocardial infarction or needed coronary revascularization. Conclusions In our cohort, a zero CAC score detected by cardiac CT rules out obstructive coronary artery disease in 98.3%, with only 1.7% of non-calcified atherosclerosis plaques and 0.6% of major adverse events. Although further research on this topic is needed, these results support the fact that non-invasive coronary angiography could be avoided in patients with low clinical likelihood of CAD and zero CAC score, facilitating the management of the increasing demand for coronary CT and reduction of radiation dose. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Downstream testing after CT coronary angiography: time for a rethink?

Open Heart ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e001597
Author(s):  
Gareth Morgan-Hughes ◽  
Michelle Claire Williams ◽  
Margaret Loudon ◽  
Carl A Roobottom ◽  
Alice Veitch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Communication Systems ◽  
Ct Coronary Angiography ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Recent Onset ◽  
Line Test ◽  
Artery Disease

ObjectiveWe surveyed UK practice and compliance with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) ‘recent-onset chest pain’ guidance (Clinical Guideline 95, 2016) as a service quality initiative. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic utility and efficacy of CT coronary angiography (CTCA), NICE-guided investigation compliance, invasive coronary angiography (ICA) use and revascularisation.MethodsA prospective analysis was conducted in nine UK centres between January 2018 and March 2020. The reporter decided whether the CTCA was diagnostic. Coronary artery disease was recorded with the Coronary Artery Disease–Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS). Local electronic records and picture archiving/communication systems were used to collect data regarding functional testing, ICA and revascularisation. Duplication of coronary angiography without revascularisation was taken as a surrogate for ICA overuse.Results5293 patients (mean age, 57±12 years; body mass index, 29±6 kg/m²; 50% men) underwent CTCA, with a 96% diagnostic scan rate. 618 (12%) underwent ICA, of which 48% (298/618) did not receive revascularisation. 3886 (73%) had CAD-RADS 0–2, with 1% (35/3886) undergoing ICA, of which 94% (33/35) received ICA as a second-line test. 547 (10%) had CAD-RADS 3, with 23% (125/547) undergoing ICA, of which 88% (110/125) chose ICA as a second-line test, with 26% (33/125) leading to revascularisation. For 552 (10%) CAD-RADS 4 and 91 (2%) CAD-RADS 5 patients, ICA revascularisation rates were 64% (221/345) and 74% (46/62), respectively.ConclusionsWhile CTCA for recent-onset chest pain assessment has been shown to be a robust test, which negates the need for further investigation in three-quarters of patients, subsequent ICA overuse remains with almost half of these procedures not leading to revascularisation.

scholarly journals CT Coronary Angiography versus Coronary Angiography to Detect Specificity and Sensitivity of CT Coronary

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Sheref M Zaghloul ◽  
Walid Hassan ◽  
Ashraf M Reda ◽  
Ghada M Sultan ◽  
Mohamed A Salah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Present Report ◽  
Invasive Coronary Angiography ◽  
Ct Coronary Angiography ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Stent Restenosis ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity ◽  
Artery Disease

Background: Various diagnostic tests including conventional invasive coronary angiography and non-invasive Computed Tomography (CT) coronary angiography are used in the diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD). Objective: The present report aims to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of CT coronary angiography in diagnosis of coronary artery disease compared to the standard invasive coronary angiography. Methods: A retrospective study was done over 2 years started from May of 2015 up to May of 2017. The medical evaluation was based on systematic reviews of diagnostic studies with invasive coronary angiography and those with CT coronary angiogram. Data on special indications (bypass grafts, in-stent-restenosis) were also included in the evaluation. The CT scanners used with 320 slices. The study included patients with diabetes, hypertension, and data included age, glomerular filtration rate and ejection fraction. Results: Of the 99 patients included in the study, sensitivity of the total lesions were 87.1% which was highest for the graft lesions (100% sensitivity) and lowest for the Left Main (LM) lesions (83.3% sensitivity), on the other hand the specificity of the total lesion were high (98.1% specificity) which also was highest for the graft lesions (100% specificity) and lowest for the Left Anterior Descending (LAD) lesions (95% specificity). Regarding accuracy, CT coronary was 96.6% accurate for the whole lesions. Conclusions: From a medical point of view, CT coronary angiography using scanners with at least 320 slices should be recommended as a test to rule in obstructive coronary stenosis in order to avoid inappropriate invasive coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest probability of CAD. Multi detector CT (MDCT) has reasonably high accuracy for detecting significant obstructive CAD when assessed at artery level.

Computerized tomography: coronary angiography and cardiac imaging

2021 ◽  
pp. 224-245
Author(s):  
Jeff M Smit ◽  
Mohammed El Mahdiui ◽  
Michiel A de Graaf ◽  
Arthur JHA Scholte ◽  
Lucia Kroft ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Computerized Tomography ◽  
Acute Chest Pain ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Computerized Tomography Angiography ◽  
Artery Disease

Patients presenting with chronic and acute chest pain constitute a common and important diagnostic challenge. This has increased interest in using computerized tomography for non-invasive visualization of coronary artery disease in patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department, particularly the subset of patients who are suspected of having an acute coronary syndrome, but without typical electrocardiographic changes and with normal troponin levels at presentation. As a result of rapid developments in coronary computerized tomography angiography technology, high diagnostic accuracies for excluding coronary artery disease can be obtained. It has been shown that these patients can be discharged safely. The accuracy for detecting a significant coronary artery stenosis is also high, but the presence of coronary artery atherosclerosis or stenosis does not imply necessarily that the cause of the chest pain is related to coronary artery disease. Moreover, non-invasive detection of coronary artery disease by computerized tomography has been shown to be related with an increased use of subsequent invasive coronary angiography and revascularization, and further studies are needed to define which patients benefit from invasive evaluation following coronary computerized tomography angiography. Conversely, implementation of coronary computerized tomography angiography can significantly reduce the length of hospital stay, with a significant cost reduction. Additionally, computerized tomography is an excellent modality in patients whose symptoms suggest other causes of acute chest pain such as aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, or pulmonary embolism. Furthermore, acquisition of the coronary arteries, thoracic aorta, and pulmonary arteries in a single computerized tomography examination is feasible, allowing ‘triple rule-out’ (exclusion of aortic dissection, pulmonary embolism, and coronary artery disease). Finally, other applications, such as evaluation of coronary artery plaque composition, myocardial function and perfusion, and non-invasive assessment of fractional flow reserve from coronary computerized tomography angiography, are currently being developed and may also become valuable in the setting of chronic and acute chest pain in the future.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document