scholarly journals Teaching End-of-Life Decision Making to Undergraduate Nursing Students

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 327-328
Author(s):  
Sherry Greenberg ◽  
Nancy Innella ◽  
Bryan Pilkington

Abstract This presentation highlights the development, implementation, and results of an educational session with undergraduate nursing students about end-of-life decision making. The purpose of this qualitative thematic analysis study was to explore student perspectives of end-of-life decision making following an education session. The aims were to 1) develop themes from student feedback on end-of-life decision making and 2) refine educational strategies to teach end-of-life decision making to nursing students. The study was conducted with 72 junior level baccalaureate nursing students enrolled in an undergraduate gerontological nursing course. An interactive lecture was developed, following short philosophical ethics readings, which brought the students up to date on the history of end-of-life discussions, key cases, and different frameworks to approach a cluster of ethical issues associated with end-of-life care. A debate pedagogical model was employed as an engaging activity in which students directly applied recently learned concepts. In the debate activity, students were divided into two teams. Each team was assigned a position, which was a specific response to the case question: Should practitioners assist in their patient’s committing suicide? Should practitioners offer medical aid in dying? Each team conferred, presented their position, responded to the arguments or reasons from the opposing position. The session ended with a debrief by the course instructors. In the first semester, 31 nursing students completed four open-ended questions following the class. Results included increased student confidence discussing end-of-life issues and identification of two concepts commonly referred to in end-of-life care discussions and in bioethics, autonomy and dignity.

2002 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 284-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
WILLIAM E. HALEY ◽  
REBECCA S. ALLEN ◽  
SANDRA REYNOLDS ◽  
HONGBIN CHEN ◽  
ALLISON BURTON ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Choong ◽  
Cynthia Cupido ◽  
Erin Nelson ◽  
Donald M Arnold ◽  
Karen Burns ◽  
...  

Background: End-of-life decisions regarding the administration, withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining therapy in the critical care setting can be challenging. Disagreements between health care providers and family members occur, especially when families believe strongly in preserving life, and physicians are resistant to providing medically “futile” care. Such disagreements can cause tension and moral distress among families and clinicians. Purpose: To outline the roles and responsibilities of physicians, substitute decision makers, and the judicial system when decisions must be made on behalf of incapable persons, and to provide a framework for conflict resolution during end-of-life decision-making for physicians practicing in Canada. Source: We used a case-based example to illustrate our objectives. We employed a comprehensive approach to understanding end-of-life decision making that included: 1) a search for relevant literature; 2) a review of provincial college policies; 3) a review of provincial legislation on consent; 4) a consultation with two bioethicists and 5) a consultation with two legal experts in health law. Principal Findings: In Canada, laws about substitute decision-making for health care are primarily provincial or territorial. Thus, laws and policies from professional regulatory bodies on end-of-life care vary across the country. We tabulated the provincial college policies on end-of-life care and the provincial legislation on consent and advance directives, and constructed a 10-step approach to conflict resolution. Conclusion: Knowledge of underlying ethical principles, understanding of professional duties, and adoption of a process for mediation and conflict resolution are essential to ensuring that physicians and institutions act responsibly in maintaining a patients’ best interests in the context of family-centred care.


2001 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 230-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
PA Miller ◽  
S Forbes ◽  
DK Boyle

Results from several research studies combined with increasing public tensions surrounding physician-assisted suicide have fueled a growing awareness of the inadequacies of end-of-life care. Investigators also suggest that intensive care unit nurses have a limited role in end-of-life decision making and care planning. This article explores cultural issues influencing end-of-life care in intensive care units, explores factors surrounding the limited involvement of critical care nurses in end-of-life decision making and care planning, and offers recommendations for changing nursing practice. Because improving end-of-life care will require cultural changes, an understanding of the cultural issues involved is needed. Recommendations for changing nursing practice include a model of end-of-life care that incorporates the goals of both cure and comfort care, as well as a shared decision-making process. Nurses are essential to improving end-of-life care in today's intensive care units.


Author(s):  
Julia I Bandini

End-of-life decision-making is an important area of research, and few sociological studies have considered family grief in light of end-of-life decision-making in the hospital. Drawing on in-depth interviews with family members in the intensive care unit (ICU) during an end-of-life hospitalization and into their bereavement period up to six months after the death of the patient, this article examines bereaved family members’ experiences of grief by examining three aspects from the end-of-life hospitalization and decision-making in the ICU that informed their subsequent bereavement experiences. First, this article explores how the process of advance care planning (ACP) shaped family experiences of grief, by demonstrating that even prior informal conversations around end-of-life care outside of having an advance directive in the hospital was beneficial for family members both during the hospitalization and afterwards in bereavement. Second, clinicians’ compassionate caring for both patients and families through the “little things” or small gestures were important to families during the end-of-life hospitalization and afterwards in bereavement. Third, the transition time in the hospital before the patient’s death facilitated family experiences of grief by providing a sense of support and meaning in bereavement. The findings have implications for clinicians who provide end-of-life care by highlighting salient aspects from the hospitalization that may shape family grief following the patient’s death. Most importantly, the notion that ACP as a social process may be a “gift” to families during end-of-life decision-making and carry through into bereavement can serve as a motivator to engage patients in ACP.


2021 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 104772
Author(s):  
Sofi Fristedt ◽  
Annika Grynne ◽  
Christina Melin-Johansson ◽  
Ingela Henoch ◽  
Carina Lundh Hagelin ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 232-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie Pattison ◽  
Geraldine O’Gara ◽  
Timothy Wigmore

Background Little research has examined the involvement of critical care outreach teams in end-of-life decision making. Objective To establish how much time critical care outreach teams spend with patients who are subsequently subject to limitation of medical treatment and end-of-life decisions and how much influence the teams have on those decisions. Methods A single-center retrospective review, with qualitative analysis, in a large cancer center. Data from all patients referred emergently for critical care outreach from October 2010 to October 2011 who later had limitation of medical treatment or end-of-life care were retrieved. Findings were analyzed by using SPSS 19 and qualitative free-text analysis. Results Of 890 patients referred for critical care outreach from October 2010 to October 2011, 377 were referred as an emergency; 108 of those had limitation of medical treatment and were included in the review. Thirty-five patients (32.4%) died while hospitalized. As a result of outreach intervention and a decision to limit medical treatment, 56 (51.9%) of the 108 patients received a formal end-of-life care plan (including care pathways, referral to palliative care team, hospice). About a fifth (21.5%) of clinical contact time is being spent on patients who subsequently are subject to limitation of medical treatment. Qualitative document analysis showed 5 emerging themes: difficulty of discussions about not attempting cardiopulmonary resuscitation, complexities in coordinating multiple teams, delays in referral and decision making, decision reversals and opaque decision making, and technical versus ethical imperatives. Conclusion A considerable amount of time is being spent on these emergency referrals, and decisions to limit medical treatment are common. The appropriateness of escalation of levels of care is often not questioned until patients become critically or acutely unwell, and outreach teams subsequently intervene.


2000 ◽  
Vol 16 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. S31-S39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daren K. Heyland ◽  
Joan Tranmer ◽  
Deb Feldman-Stewart

Recent studies of patient/family satisfaction with end-of-life care suggest that improvements in communication and decision making are likely to have the greatest impact on improving the quality of end-of-life care. The apparent failure of recent studies specifically designed to improve decision making strongly suggest that there are powerful determinants of the decision making process that are not completely understood. In this paper, we present an organizing framework that describes the decision making process and breaks it into three analytic steps: information exchange, deliberation, and making the decision. In addition, we report the results of a preliminary study of end-of-life decision making that incorporates aspects of this organizing framework. Thirty-seven seriously ill hospitalized patients were interviewed. The majority wanted to share decisional responsibility with physicians. We demonstrated the feasibility of measuring certain aspects of the decision making process in such patients. By providing and using a framework related to end-of-life decision making, we hope to better understand the complex interaction and processes between dying patients, caregivers, and physicians.


2019 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 7-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Dimoula ◽  
Grigorios Kotronoulas ◽  
Stylianos Katsaragakis ◽  
Maria Christou ◽  
Stavroula Sgourou ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document