scholarly journals DELIRIUM MOTOR SUBTYPES AND ONE-YEAR MORTALITY AFTER HIP FRACTURE SURGERY

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 1317-1318
Author(s):  
L. Carnevali ◽  
P. Mazzola ◽  
M. Corsi ◽  
G. Bellelli ◽  
G. Annoni
2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tien-Ching Lee ◽  
Pei-Shan Ho ◽  
Hui-Tzu Lin ◽  
Mei-Ling Ho ◽  
Hsuan-Ti Huang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J Canty ◽  
Johan Heiberg ◽  
Yang Yang ◽  
Alistair G Royse ◽  
Swaroop Margale ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 756-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Hwi Nho ◽  
Young-Kyun Lee ◽  
Yeon Soo Kim ◽  
Yong-Chan Ha ◽  
You-Sung Suh ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (9) ◽  
pp. 710-720
Author(s):  
Cato Kjaervik ◽  
Jan-Erik Gjertsen ◽  
Lars B. Engeseter ◽  
Eva Stensland ◽  
Eva Dybvik ◽  
...  

Aims This study aimed to describe preoperative waiting times for surgery in hip fracture patients in Norway, and analyze factors affecting waiting time and potential negative consequences of prolonged waiting time. Methods Overall, 37,708 hip fractures in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register from January 2014 to December 2018 were linked with data in the Norwegian Patient Registry. Hospitals treating hip fractures were characterized according to their hip fracture care. Waiting time (hours from admission to start of surgery), surgery within regular working hours, and surgery on the day of or on the day after admission, i.e. ‘expedited surgery’ were estimated. Results Mean waiting time was 22.6 hours (SD 20.7); 36,652 patients (97.2%) waited less than three days (< 72 hours), and 27,527 of the patients (73%) were operated within regular working hours (08:00 to 16:00). Expedited surgery was given to 31,675 of patients (84%), and of these, 19,985 (53%) were treated during regular working hours. Patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classes 4 and 5 were more likely to have surgery within regular working hours (odds ratio (OR) 1.59; p < 0.001), and less likely to receive expedited surgery than ASA 1 patients (OR 0.29; p < 0.001). Low-volume hospitals treated a larger proportion of patients during regular working hours than high volume hospitals (OR 1.26; p < 0.001). High-volume hospitals had less expedited surgery and significantly longer waiting times than low and intermediate-low volume hospitals. Higher ASA classes and Charlson Comorbidity Index increased waiting time. Patients not receiving expedited surgery had higher 30-day and one-year mortality rates (OR 1.19; p < 0.001) and OR 1.13; p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion There is inequality in waiting time for hip fracture treatment in Norway. Variations in waiting time from admission to hip fracture surgery depended on both patient and hospital factors. Not receiving expedited surgery was associated with increased 30-day and one-year mortality rates. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(9):710–720.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Huette ◽  
Osama Abou-Arab ◽  
Az-Eddine Djebara ◽  
Benjamin Terrasi ◽  
Christophe Beyls ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 685-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrocinio Ariza-Vega ◽  
José Juan Jiménez-Moleón ◽  
Morten Tange Kristensen

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Victor Lorente ◽  
Francesca Reguant ◽  
Anna Arnau ◽  
Marcelo Borderas ◽  
Juan Carlos Prieto ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Goal-Directed Hemodynamic Therapy (GDHT) has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in high-risk surgical patients. However, there is little evidence of its efficacy in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery. This study aims to evaluate the effect of GDHT guided by non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring on perioperative complications in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.Methods: Patients > 64 years undergoing hip fracture surgery within an Enhanced Recovery Pathway were enrolled in this single-center, non-randomized, intervention study with a historical control group and 12-months follow-up. Exclusion criteria were patients with pathological fractures, traffic-related fractures and refractures. Control group patients received the standard care given at our hospital. Intervention group patients received an individualized management strategy aimed at achieving an optimal stroke volume by fluid administration, in addition to a systolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg and an optimal cardiac index according to the patient's age and baseline metabolic equivalents. No changes were made between groups in the enhanced recovery protocols, nor in the composition of the multidisciplinary team during the study period. Primary combined outcome was perioperative complications. Intraoperatively: haemodynamic instability, sustained cardiac arrhythmias. Postoperative complications: cardiovascular, respiratory, infectious and renal complications. Secondary outcomes were administered fluids, vasopressor requirements, perioperative transfusion, length of hospital stay, readmission and one-year survival.Results: 551 patients (Control group=272; Intervention group=279). Intraoperative haemodynamic instability was lower in the intervention group (37.5% vs 28.0%; p=0.017). GDHT patients had fewer postoperative cardiovascular (18.8% vs 7.2%; p < 0.001), respiratory (15.1% vs 3.6%; p<0.001) and infectious complications (21% vs 3.9%; p<0.001) but not renal (12.1% vs 33.7%; p<0.001). Intervention group patients had less vasopressors requirements (p<0.001) and received less fluids (p=0.001) than control group. Fewer patients required transfusion in GDHT group (p<0.001). For intervention group patients, median length of hospital stay was shorter (p < 0.001) and one-year survival higher (p<0.003).Conclusions: The use of GDHT decreases intraoperative complications and postoperative cardiovascular, respiratory and infectious but not postoperative renal complications. This strategy was associated with a shorter hospital stay and increased one-year survival.Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02479321


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document