scholarly journals DEMENTIA-SPECIFIC STAFF TRAINING: VARIATION AND TRENDS IN U.S. ASSISTED LIVING STATE POLICIES

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 921-921
Author(s):  
L Smith ◽  
P Carder ◽  
K Thomas ◽  
B Kaskie ◽  
S Taylor ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 66-66
Author(s):  
Elise Abken ◽  
Alexis Bender ◽  
Ann Vandenberg ◽  
Candace Kemp ◽  
Molly Perkins

Abstract Assisted living (AL) communities are increasingly home to frail, chronically ill older adults who remain until death. State laws mandate that AL facilities request copies of any advance care planning documents residents have and make forms available upon request. Using secondary data from a larger study funded by the National Institute on Aging (R01AG047408) that focuses on end-of-life (EOL) care in AL, this project investigated barriers and facilitators to conducting advance care planning in AL. Data included in-depth interviews (of 86 minute average length) with 20 administrators from 7 facilities around the Atlanta metropolitan area and aggregate data collected from each facility regarding facility, staff, and resident characteristics. Findings from thematic analysis of qualitative data showed that key barriers to planning in AL included lack of staff training and reluctance among administrators and families to discuss advance care planning and EOL care. Important facilitators included periodic follow-up discussions of residents’ wishes, often during care plan meetings, educating families about the importance of planning, and external support for staff training and family education from agencies such as hospice and home health. Three study facilities exceeded state requirements to request and store documents by systematically encouraging residents to complete documentation. These facilities, whose administrators discuss advance care planning and residents’ EOL wishes with residents and families during regular care plan meetings, were more likely to have planning documents on file, demonstrating the potential of long-term care communities, such as AL, to successfully promote advance care planning among residents and their family members.


Author(s):  
Helena Temkin-Greener ◽  
Yunjiao Mao ◽  
Susan Ladwig ◽  
Xueya Cai ◽  
Sheryl Zimmerman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 37-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret P. Calkins ◽  
Jennifer Brush

Abstract The entire field of long-term care is under tremendous pressure to change. Traditional environmental approaches based on staff-centric or medical models are no longer considered appropriate in long-term care settings. The new emphasis is on person-centered or self-directed care. This is reflected in settings where people can live comfortably and feel at home, as opposed to feeling like they are in a hospital. Increasingly, nursing homes are working to be more like assisted living facilities, which emphasize privacy, dignity, and choice. These changes affect all aspects of care from structure of governance to staff training to management structure and facility design. This article will cover the issues and the possible solutions to ensuring that long-term care living is more like a home than a hospital.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 716-717
Author(s):  
Kali Thomas ◽  
Portia Cornell ◽  
Wenhan Zhang ◽  
Paula Carder ◽  
Lindsey Smith ◽  
...  

Abstract We identified a cohort of 410,413 Medicare beneficiaries residing in 10,623 large (25+bed) assisted living (AL) communities between 2007 and 2017. We conducted linear probability models with a difference-in-difference framework to examine the association between hospitalization and changes in regulations pertaining to staff training (model 1) and staffing levels (model 2), adjusting for time trends, resident characteristics, and state-license fixed effects. During this 11-year period, six states changed their staff training requirements and two states introduced/increased direct care staffing levels. A change in regulations related to staffing levels was associated with a reduction in the probability of hospitalization during the month of -0.0056 percentage points (95%CI=-0.008,-0.003). A change in regulations related to staff training was associated with a reduction in the probability of hospitalization during the month of -0.0035 percentage points (95%CI=-0.006,-0.002). The policy effects represent clinically important differences of approximately 21% in the mean monthly hospitalization rate. Part of a symposium sponsored by Assisted Living Interest Group.


2011 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 1060-1068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheryl Zimmerman ◽  
Karen Love ◽  
Philip D. Sloane ◽  
Lauren W. Cohen ◽  
David Reed ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 502-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Teri ◽  
Glenise L. McKenzie ◽  
Kenneth C. Pike ◽  
Carol J. Farran ◽  
Cornelia Beck ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S545-S545
Author(s):  
Paula Carder ◽  
Lindsey Smith ◽  
Seamus Taylor ◽  
Brian Kaskie ◽  
Kali S Thomas

Abstract We describe two categories of dementia-specific AL requirements: staff training and admission/discharge criteria. We reviewed current requirements for all states and the District of Columbia, and amendments made over 12 years. Current and historic regulations were collected and analyzed using policy surveillance and qualitative coding. Twenty-three states currently require dementia-specific training, and 22 require continuing education. Nearly all states (49) require administrators to complete dementia-specific training. Of these, 13 states specified 7 to 120 hours of dementia care training. Some states added pre-admission screening for cognitive impairment; a few require a dementia diagnosis for admission. We describe state variation longitudinally in direct care staff training requirements, including: number of training hours, training content, and use of examinations or other tests of knowledge, skills and abilities. In addition, we categorize changes in admission/discharge criteria over time, including the use of medical versus behavioral health symptoms.


2021 ◽  
pp. 073346482098880
Author(s):  
Elise S. Abken ◽  
Molly M. Perkins ◽  
Alexis A. Bender

Objectives: This project examined administrator processes, barriers, and facilitators for conducting advance care planning in assisted living. Method: Data from qualitative interviews with 27 administrators from seven diverse assisted living communities in the metropolitan Atlanta area were linked with descriptive and administrative data collected from each site and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Although administrators generally contended with a lack of staff training and stakeholders’ reluctance to discuss advance care planning and end-of-life care, important facilitators of advance care planning in some assisted living communities included periodic follow-up discussions of residents’ wishes and successfully educating consumers about the importance of planning. Three study communities whose administrators discussed planning with residents and informal caregivers during regular care plan meetings had more advance care planning documents on file. Discussion: These findings demonstrate the potential for nonmedical organizations, such as assisted living, to successfully promote advance care planning among their members.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document