BEHAVIORAL HEALTH WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT TO IMPROVE DEMENTIA CARE IN INTEGRATED PRIMARY CARE

Abstract People with dementia (PwD) receive most of their health care in primary care, yet timely recognition and optimal management of dementia in that setting continues to be challenging. Implementation of primary care medical home models in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) holds promise for improving quality and coordination of dementia care through interprofessional collaboration. Integrating behavioral health providers (BHPs) into primary care may help to support the care of people with dementia and their families. However, most integrated BHPs have a generalist training background and likely require professional education to address the unique needs of patients with dementia. We will describe findings from a national VHA education needs survey of integrated BHPs and an in-depth qualitative study examining primary care for PwD in two large VHA healthcare systems. We will discuss how geriatric experts can serve as trainers to address current gaps in primary care of PwD.

Download Full-text

Outcomes of Primary Care for People With Dementia: What’s Important?

Innovation in Aging ◽

10.1093/geroni/igaa057.533 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 164-165

Author(s):

Laura Wray ◽

Bonnie Vest ◽

Laura Brady ◽

Christina Vair ◽

Gregory Beehler ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Older Adults ◽

Primary Care ◽

Health And Safety ◽

Limited Attention ◽

Veterans Health ◽

Cognitive Screening ◽

Health Administration ◽

People With Dementia ◽

Primary Care Teams ◽

Care Outcomes

Abstract People with dementia (PWD) typically receive most of their healthcare in primary care (PC), but neurocognitive disorders can be challenging to recognize, assess, and manage in that setting. As a result, cognitive impairment in older adults is often missed or not addressed until later stages. The result is poor management of comorbid health conditions, increased healthcare utilization, and negative outcomes for the patient and family. Further, strategies for improvement and barriers to high quality PC for PWD have received limited attention. To improve PC for PWD, it is essential to understand what care outcomes should be targeted. To address this gap, we used a qualitative approach to examine potential outcomes of PC from the perspectives of older adults, family caregivers, primary care teams, and geriatrics specialists (n=79) from two Veterans Health Administration healthcare systems. Participants were interviewed individually or in focus groups. A directed content analysis based on the adapted Donabedian model was employed and expanded to fully capture transcript content. Three main categories of outcomes were identified: Personhood (i.e., independence), Physical Health and Safety, and Quality of Life. Regardless of participant type, respondents focused on similar desired outcomes and, notably, identified outcomes as important for both patients and their broader social context (i.e., caregivers, family). Discussion will: show how findings align with work conducted in specialty and residential care; describe how challenges to attaining these outcomes in PC can be overcome; and, challenge cognitive screening recommendations for PC that are based primarily on risk/benefit analysis of medication-focused outcomes.

Download Full-text

Provider perspectives on a clinical demonstration project to transition patients with stable mental health conditions to primary care

Translational Behavioral Medicine ◽

10.1093/tbm/ibz172 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Terri L Fletcher ◽

Adrienne L Johnson ◽

Bo Kim ◽

Zenab Yusuf ◽

Justin Benzer ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mental Health ◽

Primary Care ◽

Qualitative Interviews ◽

Veterans Health ◽

Mental Health Providers ◽

Health Providers ◽

Health Administration ◽

Provider Education ◽

Provider Perspectives

Abstract Research to improve access to mental healthcare often focuses on increasing timely referrals from primary care (PC) to specialty mental health (SMH). However, timely and appropriate transitions back to PC are indispensable for increasing access to SMH for new patients. We developed and implemented a formalized process to identify patients eligible for transition from SMH to PC. The FLOW intervention was piloted at a Veterans Health Administration community-based outpatient clinic. Qualitatively examine provider perspectives regarding patient transitions at initiation and termination of the FLOW project. Sixteen mental health providers and three PC staff completed qualitative interviews about the benefits and drawbacks of FLOW at initiation. Ten mental health providers and one PC staff completed interviews at 12-month follow-up. Primary benefits anticipated at initiation were that FLOW would increase access to SMH, provide acknowledgment of veterans’ recovery, and differentiate between higher and lower intensity mental health services. SMH providers reported additional perceived benefits at 12-month follow-up, including decreased stress over their caseloads and increased ability to deliver efficient, effective treatment. Anticipated drawbacks at initiation were that veterans would get inconsistent care, PC could not offer the same level of care as SMH, and veterans might view transition as a rejection by their SMH provider. Perceived drawbacks were similar at 12-month follow-up, but there was less frequent endorsement. Findings highlight need for sustained and frequent provider education regarding (i) the appropriate characteristics of individuals eligible for transition and (ii) established procedures to ensure care coordination during and after transition.

Download Full-text

Complementary and Integrative Health Approaches Are Underused Among Older Veterans With Musculoskeletal Pain

Innovation in Aging ◽

10.1093/geroni/igaa057.657 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 203-203

Author(s):

Ling Han ◽

Robert Kerns ◽

Melissa Skanderson ◽

Stephen Luther ◽

Samah Fodeh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Primary Care ◽

Language Processing ◽

National Policy ◽

Female Gender ◽

Estimating Equation ◽

Chiropractic Care ◽

Veterans Health ◽

Health Administration ◽

Integrative Health ◽

Spatial Confounding

Abstract Complementary and integrative health (CIH) approaches are recommended in national policy guidelines as viable options for managing chronic pain, yet their use among Veterans has been suboptimal, especially for older Veterans. We identified 64,444 Veterans with a diagnosis of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) who reported a moderate to severe pain intensity during primary care visits in 2013 from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) electronic records. Using natural language processing (NLP), CIH use (acupuncture, chiropractic care and massage) was documented for 8169 (6.5%) of 125408 primary care visits in providers’ progress notes. Compared to their younger counterparts, older Veterans aged ≥ 65 years had 21% lower likelihood of using CIH during the year [Odds Ratio (OR): 0.79; 95% Confidence Intervals (CI): 0.73, 0.86] after accounting for demographic, clinical, temporal and spatial confounding using a generalized estimating equation logistic model. Non-white race/ethnicity, tobacco use, medical comorbidities and diagnosis of alcohol or substance use disorders were independently associated with less CIH use (ORs ranging 0.97-0.80, p<0.03-0.0001); whereas female gender, being married and number of MSD diagnoses were associated with greater CIH use (ORs ranging 1.13-1.30, p<0.0001). Redefining CIH use as chiropractic care alone [4.8% person-visits; OR: 0.78 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.86)] or incorporating structured data [9.0% person-visits; OR: 0.76 (95% CI: 0.70-0.82)] in the adjusted GEE model derived consistent results. Research to identify and address barriers to CIH use among older Veterans is encouraged.

Download Full-text

Clinical practice guidelines and principles of care for people with dementia: a protocol for undertaking a Delphi technique to identify the recommendations relevant to primary care nurses in the delivery of person-centred dementia care

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044843 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (5) ◽

pp. e044843

Author(s):

Caroline Gibson ◽

Dianne Goeman ◽

Mark William Yates ◽

Dimity Pond

Keyword(s):

Primary Care ◽

General Practice ◽

Clinical Practice ◽

Clinical Practice Guidelines ◽

Practice Guidelines ◽

Dementia Care ◽

Care Nurse ◽

Primary Care Nurse ◽

People With Dementia ◽

Primary Care Nurses

IntroductionNationally and internationally it is well recognised that dementia is poorly recognised and suboptimally managed in the primary care setting. There are multiple and complex reasons for this gap in care, including a lack of knowledge, high care demands and inadequate time for the general practitioner alone to manage dementia with its multiple physical, psychological and social dimensions. The primary care nurse potentially has a role in assisting the general practitioner in the provision of evidence-based dementia care. Although dementia-care guidelines for general practitioners exist, evidence on resources to support the primary care nurse in dementia care provision is scarce. The ‘Australian Clinical Practice Guidelines and Principles of Care for People with Dementia’ provides 109 recommendations for the diagnosis and management of dementia. This protocol describes a Delphi study to identify which of the 109 recommendations contained in these multidisciplinary guidelines are relevant to the primary care nurse in the delivery of person-centred dementia care in the general practice setting.Methods and analysisUsing a Delphi consensus online survey, an expert panel will grade each of the recommendations written in the ‘Clinical Practice Guidelines and Principles of Care for People with Dementia’ as high-to-low relevance with respect to the role of the primary care nurse in general practice. To optimise reliability of results, quality indicators will be used in the data collection and reporting of the study. Invited panel members will include Australian primary care nurses working in general practice, primary care nursing researchers and representatives of the Australian Primary Health Care Nurses Association, the peak professional body for nurses working in primary healthcare.Ethics and disseminationThis study has been approved by The University of Newcastle Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (H-2019-0029).Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences.

Download Full-text