scholarly journals Outcomes of Primary Care for People With Dementia: What’s Important?

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 164-165
Author(s):  
Laura Wray ◽  
Bonnie Vest ◽  
Laura Brady ◽  
Christina Vair ◽  
Gregory Beehler ◽  
...  

Abstract People with dementia (PWD) typically receive most of their healthcare in primary care (PC), but neurocognitive disorders can be challenging to recognize, assess, and manage in that setting. As a result, cognitive impairment in older adults is often missed or not addressed until later stages. The result is poor management of comorbid health conditions, increased healthcare utilization, and negative outcomes for the patient and family. Further, strategies for improvement and barriers to high quality PC for PWD have received limited attention. To improve PC for PWD, it is essential to understand what care outcomes should be targeted. To address this gap, we used a qualitative approach to examine potential outcomes of PC from the perspectives of older adults, family caregivers, primary care teams, and geriatrics specialists (n=79) from two Veterans Health Administration healthcare systems. Participants were interviewed individually or in focus groups. A directed content analysis based on the adapted Donabedian model was employed and expanded to fully capture transcript content. Three main categories of outcomes were identified: Personhood (i.e., independence), Physical Health and Safety, and Quality of Life. Regardless of participant type, respondents focused on similar desired outcomes and, notably, identified outcomes as important for both patients and their broader social context (i.e., caregivers, family). Discussion will: show how findings align with work conducted in specialty and residential care; describe how challenges to attaining these outcomes in PC can be overcome; and, challenge cognitive screening recommendations for PC that are based primarily on risk/benefit analysis of medication-focused outcomes.

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S379-S380
Author(s):  
Laura O Wray ◽  
Bonnie M Vest ◽  
Laura Levon Brady ◽  
Paul R King

Abstract People with dementia (PwD) receive most of their health care in primary care, yet timely recognition and optimal management of dementia in that setting continues to be challenging. Implementation of primary care medical home models in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) holds promise for improving quality and coordination of dementia care through interprofessional collaboration. Integrating behavioral health providers (BHPs) into primary care may help to support the care of people with dementia and their families. However, most integrated BHPs have a generalist training background and likely require professional education to address the unique needs of patients with dementia. We will describe findings from a national VHA education needs survey of integrated BHPs and an in-depth qualitative study examining primary care for PwD in two large VHA healthcare systems. We will discuss how geriatric experts can serve as trainers to address current gaps in primary care of PwD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 603-612
Author(s):  
Portia Y. Cornell ◽  
Christopher W. Halladay ◽  
Joseph Ader ◽  
Jaime Halaszynski ◽  
Melinda Hogue ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 942-949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie L Shimada ◽  
Beth Ann Petrakis ◽  
James A Rothendler ◽  
Maryan Zirkle ◽  
Shibei Zhao ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: We sought to understand how patients and primary care teams use secure messaging (SM) to communicate with one another by analyzing secure message threads from 2 Department of Veterans Affairs facilities. Methods: We coded 1000 threads of SM communication sampled from 40 primary care teams. Results: Most threads (94.5%) were initiated by patients (90.4%) or caregivers (4.1%); only 5.5% were initiated by primary care team members proactively reaching out to patients. Medication renewals and refills (47.2%), scheduling requests (17.6%), medication issues (12.9%), and health issues (12.7%) were the most common patient-initiated requests, followed by referrals (7.0%), administrative issues (6.5%), test results (5.4%), test issues (5.2%), informing messages (4.9%), comments about the patient portal or SM (4.1%), appreciation (3.9%), self-reported data (2.8%), life issues (1.5%), and complaints (1.5%). Very few messages were clinically urgent (0.7%) or contained other potentially challenging content. Message threads were mostly short (2.7 messages), comprising an average of 1.35 discrete content types. A substantial proportion of issues (24.2%) did not show any evidence of being resolved through SM. Time to response and extent of resolution via SM varied by message content. Proactive SM use by teams varied, but was most often for test results (32.7%), medication-related issues (21.8%), medication renewals (16.4%), or scheduling issues (18.2%). Conclusions: The majority of messages were transactional and initiated by patients or caregivers. Not all content categories were fully addressed over SM. Further education and training for both patients and clinical teams could improve the quality and efficiency of SM communication.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 203-203
Author(s):  
Ling Han ◽  
Robert Kerns ◽  
Melissa Skanderson ◽  
Stephen Luther ◽  
Samah Fodeh ◽  
...  

Abstract Complementary and integrative health (CIH) approaches are recommended in national policy guidelines as viable options for managing chronic pain, yet their use among Veterans has been suboptimal, especially for older Veterans. We identified 64,444 Veterans with a diagnosis of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) who reported a moderate to severe pain intensity during primary care visits in 2013 from the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) electronic records. Using natural language processing (NLP), CIH use (acupuncture, chiropractic care and massage) was documented for 8169 (6.5%) of 125408 primary care visits in providers’ progress notes. Compared to their younger counterparts, older Veterans aged ≥ 65 years had 21% lower likelihood of using CIH during the year [Odds Ratio (OR): 0.79; 95% Confidence Intervals (CI): 0.73, 0.86] after accounting for demographic, clinical, temporal and spatial confounding using a generalized estimating equation logistic model. Non-white race/ethnicity, tobacco use, medical comorbidities and diagnosis of alcohol or substance use disorders were independently associated with less CIH use (ORs ranging 0.97-0.80, p<0.03-0.0001); whereas female gender, being married and number of MSD diagnoses were associated with greater CIH use (ORs ranging 1.13-1.30, p<0.0001). Redefining CIH use as chiropractic care alone [4.8% person-visits; OR: 0.78 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.86)] or incorporating structured data [9.0% person-visits; OR: 0.76 (95% CI: 0.70-0.82)] in the adjusted GEE model derived consistent results. Research to identify and address barriers to CIH use among older Veterans is encouraged.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 796-796
Author(s):  
Becky Powers ◽  
Kathryn Nearing ◽  
Studi Dang ◽  
William Hung ◽  
Hillary Lum

Abstract Providing interprofessional geriatric care via telehealth is a unique clinical skillset that differs from providing face-to-face care. The lack of clear guidance on telehealth best practices for providing care to older adults and their care partners has created a systems-based practice educational gap. For several years, GRECC Connect has provided interprofessional telehealth visits to older adults, frequently training interprofessional learners in the process. Using our interprofessional telehealth expertise, the GRECC Connect Education Workgroup created telehealth competencies for the delivery of care to older adults and care partners for interprofessional learners. Competencies incorporate key telehealth, interprofessional and geriatric domains, and were informed by diverse stakeholders within the Veterans Health Administration. During this symposium, comments will be solicited from attendees. Once finalized, these competencies will drive the development of robust curricula and evaluation measures aimed at training the next generation of interprofessional providers to expertly care for older adults via telehealth.


Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 100587
Author(s):  
Lucinda B. Leung ◽  
Danielle Rose ◽  
Rong Guo ◽  
Catherine E. Brayton ◽  
Lisa V. Rubenstein ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document