scholarly journals PARTNER MOOD IS RELATED TO PERSONALITY JUDGMENT ACCURACY IN SAME-AGED AND MIXED-AGE DYADS

2016 ◽  
Vol 56 (Suppl_3) ◽  
pp. 64-64
Keyword(s):  
Judgment Accuracy ◽  
Personality Judgment ◽  
Mixed Age

scholarly journals Accuracy in Judging Others’ Personalities: The Role of Emotion Recognition, Emotion Understanding, and Trait Emotional Intelligence

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Cyril Jaksic ◽  
Katja Schlegel
Keyword(s):  
Emotional Intelligence ◽  
Emotion Recognition ◽  
Emotion Understanding ◽  
Trait Emotional Intelligence ◽  
Judgment Accuracy ◽  
Personality Judgment ◽  
Domain Specific ◽  
Individual Difference Variable ◽  
Recognition Ability ◽  
Emotion Recognition Ability

The ability to accurately judge others’ personality and the ability to accurately recognize others’ emotions are both part of the broader construct of interpersonal accuracy (IPA). However, little research has examined the association between these two IPA domains. Little is also known about the relationship between personality judgment accuracy and other socio-emotional skills and traits. In the present study, 121 participants judged eight traits (Big Five, intelligence, cooperativeness, and empathy) in each of 30 targets who were presented either in a photograph, a muted video, or a video with sound. The videos were 30 second excerpts from negotiations that the targets had engaged in. Participants also completed standard tests of emotion recognition ability, emotion understanding, and trait emotional intelligence. Results showed that personality judgment accuracy, when indexed as trait accuracy and distinctive profile accuracy, positively correlated with emotion recognition ability and was unrelated to emotion understanding and trait emotional intelligence. Female participants were more accurate in judging targets’ personality than men. These results provide support for IPA as a set of correlated domain-specific skills and encourage further research on personality judgment accuracy as a meaningful individual difference variable.

The Realistic Accuracy Model

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tera D. Letzring ◽  
David C. Funder
Keyword(s):  
Future Research ◽  
Good Information ◽  
Judgment Accuracy ◽  
Personality Judgment ◽  
Good Target ◽  
History Of ◽  
Good Judge ◽  
Judgmental Accuracy

This chapter describes the realistic accuracy model (RAM), starting with a history of its development. It then describes the four moderators of accuracy in personality judgment—good judge, good target, good trait, and good information—and how these moderators interact with each other. Next, it describes the four stages in the process of making accurate judgments, which are relevance, availability, detection, and utilization. Implications of the model for improving judgment accuracy and applications to judgments of states are then discussed. The chapter concludes with suggested directions for future research, including judgments of other levels of personality besides traits, interactions between moderators, the development of judgmental ability, and the consequences of judgmental accuracy.

scholarly journals Recognising faces but not traits; Accurate personality judgment from faces is unrelated to superior face memory

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liam Satchell ◽  
Josh P Davis ◽  
Eglantine Julle-Danière ◽  
Nina Tupper ◽  
Paul Marshman
Keyword(s):  
Personality Traits ◽  
Big Five ◽  
Big Five Personality Traits ◽  
Big Five Personality ◽  
Judgment Accuracy ◽  
Memory Ability ◽  
Face Memory ◽  
Personality Judgment ◽  
Domain Specific ◽  
The Relationship

Research has shown that individuals can recognise personality traits from photographs of others’ faces. It is suggested that this is possible as faces contain a biometric ‘kernel of truth’ for personality traits. If biometric facial features facilitate person judgments, then those adept at face memory (super-recognisers) could show heightened ability at recognising personality traits. This study evaluates the links between face memory accuracy and trait judgment accuracy. We investigated the relationship between participants’ face memory, Big Five personality traits and their accuracy in judging the Big Five personality traits (from 50 self-selected photographs of unknown individuals) in a sample of 792 individuals. We replicated previous findings that participant extraversion relates to face memory ability. We find no relationship between other personality traits, personality judgment accuracy and face memory. Individual differences in detecting personality traits do not relate to their face memory abilities. We do replicate the relationship between extraversion and face memory ability in the largest sample to date. This suggests that super-recognising faces and traits are domain-specific abilities. If surveillance operators are expected to detect impending incidents, then our findings would suggest that this is something that super-recognisers would need training in.

How Do Different Ways of Measuring Individual Differences in Zero‐Acquaintance Personality Judgment Accuracy Correlate With Each Other?

2017 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith A. Hall ◽  
Mitja D. Back ◽  
Steffen Nestler ◽  
Denise Frauendorfer ◽  
Marianne Schmid Mast ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Judgment Accuracy ◽  
Personality Judgment ◽  
Zero Acquaintance

The structure of personality judgment accuracy

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Allen Hall ◽  
Denise Frauendorfer ◽  
Marianne Schmid Mast ◽  
Mollie A. Ruben ◽  
Krista M. Hill
Keyword(s):  
Judgment Accuracy ◽  
Personality Judgment

From photograph to face-to-face: Brief interactions change person and personality judgments

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liam Satchell
Keyword(s):  
First Impressions ◽  
Social Judgments ◽  
Judgment Accuracy ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Personality Judgment ◽  
Negative Valence ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Face ◽  
Positive Attribute ◽  
Person Judgment

Research into ‘first impressions’ frequently uses photographs of faces as representations of unknown others. This is the case for legitimate concerns about standardisation, sample size and experimental control. However, there is little work investigating the robustness of these first impressions through first interactions. A sample of 97 pairs of stranger participants (N= 194) completed personality measures (of Big Five and Triarchic Model of Psychopathy), made personality and social judgments of a photograph of the face of their to-be partner, then engaged in five minutes (maximum) of unstructured interaction with their partner and then made their judgments again. The behaviour of the participants in the interaction was coded using 76 criteria. Generally, before and after judgments were correlated, but significantly different at Time 2. Personality judgment accuracy at Time 1 was poor overall but at Time 2 participants showed self-other agreement on Neuroticism, Extraversion and psychopathic Boldness. At Time 1 participant ratings of confidence were more similar to negative valence but at Time 2 confidence was a positive attribute. Coded behaviours related to ‘engagement’ were those that influenced the person judgments the most, and these were related to Extraversion, Agreeableness and Boldness of participants. Overall, the results of this study show that first personality and person judgments change from photographs to face-to-face interaction. Person judgment research should be aware of the extent to which judgments of photographs relate to first interaction.

The Relation Between Teachers' Diagnostic Sensitivity, their Instructional Activities, and their Students' Achievement Gains in Reading*

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 283-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Behrmann ◽  
Elmar Souvignier
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Classroom Management ◽  
Reading Program ◽  
Multilevel Analyses ◽  
Moderating Effects ◽  
Management Skills ◽  
Judgment Accuracy ◽  
Achievement Gains ◽  
Instructional Activities ◽  
Main Effects

Single studies suggest that the effectiveness of certain instructional activities depends on teachers' judgment accuracy. However, sufficient empirical data is still lacking. In this longitudinal study (N = 75 teachers and 1,865 students), we assessed if the effectiveness of teacher feedback was moderated by judgment accuracy in a standardized reading program. For the purpose of a discriminant validation, moderating effects of teachers' judgment accuracy on their classroom management skills were examined. As expected, multilevel analyses revealed larger reading comprehension gains when teachers provided students with a high number of feedbacks and simultaneously demonstrated high judgment accuracy. Neither interactions nor main effects were found for classroom management skills on reading comprehension. Moreover, no significant interactions with judgment accuracy but main effects were found for both feedback and classroom management skills concerning reading strategy knowledge gains. The implications of the results are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document