R (Independent Schools Council) v Charity Commission for England and Wales [2011] UKUT 421 (TCC), Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek Whayman
Keyword(s):  
Independent Schools ◽  
England And Wales ◽  
Charity Commission

Essential Cases: Equity & Trusts provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in R (Independent Schools Council) v Charity Commission for England and Wales [2011] UKUT 421 (TCC), Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber). The document also includes supporting commentary from author Derek Whayman.

R (Independent Schools Council) v Charity Commission for England and Wales [2011] UKUT 421 (TCC), Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek Whayman
Keyword(s):  
Independent Schools ◽  
England And Wales ◽  
Charity Commission

Essential Cases: Equity & Trusts provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in R (Independent Schools Council) v Charity Commission for England and Wales [2011] UKUT 421 (TCC), Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber). The document also includes supporting commentary from author Derek Whayman.

R (Independent Schools Council) v Charity Commission for England and Wales [2012] Ch 214, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek Whayman
Keyword(s):  
Independent Schools ◽  
England And Wales ◽  
Charity Commission

Essential Cases: Equity & Trusts provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in R (Independent Schools Council) v Charity Commission for England and Wales [2012] Ch 214, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber). The document also includes supporting commentary from author Derek Whayman.

R (Independent Schools Council) v Charity Commission for England and Wales [2011] UKUT 421 (TCC), Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek Whayman
Keyword(s):  
Independent Schools ◽  
England And Wales ◽  
Charity Commission

Essential Cases: Equity & Trusts provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in R (Independent Schools Council) v Charity Commission for England and Wales [2011] UKUT 421 (TCC), Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber). The document also includes supporting commentary from author Derek Whayman.

June–September 2018

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-78
Author(s):  
Frank Cranmer
Keyword(s):  
Annual Income ◽  
England And Wales ◽  
Church Congregations ◽  
Charity Commission ◽  
On Line ◽  
Mail Address ◽  
E Mail ◽  
Do So

The Charity Commission for England and Wales published an updated list of the questions to be included in the 2018 Annual Return for registered charities. The trustees of charities excepted from registration with the Commission – which include a considerable number of church congregations – are not required to submit an annual return; but an increasing number find that they must do so because when an excepted charity's annual income exceeds £100,000 it loses its excepted status. The previously expressed intention to require every charity trustee to provide an e-mail address has been abandoned; instead, the Commission intends to ask all trustees either to supply an e-mail address or to confirm that they do not have one – which looks very like a welcome climbdown. The Commission's on-line Annual Return Service opened for submissions on 20 August.

The records of the Charity Commissions a source for urban history

Urban History ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 31-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Grady
Keyword(s):  
Nineteenth Century ◽  
Eighteenth Century ◽  
Urban History ◽  
Effective Utilization ◽  
England And Wales ◽  
The Public ◽  
Charity Commission ◽  
Public Record ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Made In

Officially sponsored investigation of charities has a long history encompassing the seventeenth-and eighteenth-century commissions issued under the Statutes of Charitable Uses of 1597 and 1601, and the brief national inquiry made for the Gilbert returns of 1787–8. It was in the nineteenth century, however, that the first detailed general surveys of English and Welsh charities were made. In August 1818, amidst revived interest in the more effective utilization of charitable funds, the Brougham Commission was appointed by parliament to examine the state of charitable trusts for educational purposes in England. With the renewal and widening of its powers in the following year, it spent almost two decades investigating charitable trusts of all types in England and Wales. The Commission expired in 1837 but, after lengthy vacillation, parliament set up a permanent body in 1853. Like its predecessor, this new commission began collecting up-to-date information about charitable trusts; a task it still performs today. The invaluable products of the two commissions are several voluminous series of reports and digests printed in Parliamentary Papers between 1819 and 1913, and extensive records dating from 1819 held by the Charity Commission and the Public Record Office. This article discusses these sources and their value to the urban historian.

scholarly journals What Regulation, Who Pays? Public Attitudes to Charity Regulation in England and Wales

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eddy Hogg
Keyword(s):  
Focus Groups ◽  
Public Attitudes ◽  
Public Knowledge ◽  
England And Wales ◽  
Charity Commission ◽  
Regulatory Functions ◽  
Charity Regulation

Funding for England and Wales’ Charity Commission has been cut by 48% between 2007 and 2016, affecting its ability to deliver its core regulatory functions. Conversations around what charity regulation should look like and how it should be funded have, therefore, gained momentum. These debates, however, are not limited to England and Wales, and in this article, we contribute to them by exploring public attitudes to these questions, presenting the findings of four focus groups. We find that although public knowledge of charity regulation is low, people are, nonetheless, clear that charities should be regulated. There is no clear preferred method of funding a charity regulator and a significant amount of complexity and nuance in public attitudes. People trust charities, but this can be eroded if they do not have confidence in how they operate. A visibly effective regulator supporting and supported by charities is central to maintaining trust.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document