O-108 Opinion and perceptions about how new family models conceived through Assisted Reproduction Techniques and parenthood differ between different generations in Argentina

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Nabel ◽  
P Nicotra ◽  
M V Cerisola ◽  
G Moscoso ◽  
E Jaureguy ◽  
...  

Abstract Study question What is the degree of acceptance of new family models using Assisted Reproductive Techniques and what is the childbearing perception among different generations in Argentina Summary answer The youngest accept different family conformations through fertility treatments more than olders. They also consider, in greater proportion, that happiness is not linked to childbearing What is known already (1). Human reproduction changed dramatically in the last 40 years, with the development of Assisted Reproductive Treatments (ART) (2). In accordance with the new family models, gender diversity, self-acceptance and social openness, unacceptable until recently, are today a new reality. Since 2013, in Argentina, fertility treatments are regulated under National Law No. 26.862, allowing full access to ART regardless of marital status or sexual orientation. (3). However, there is still a legal vacuum around uterine surrogacy, which hinders treatment particularly in male homosexual couples. Study design, size, duration This is a cross-disciplinary descriptive study based on data obtained from an online self-administered survey. We surveyed a sample of 1800 people from the general population during June 2020. Participants/materials, setting, methods A structured and self-administered survey was carried out through OPINAIA (research consultant). Participants answered voluntarily an anonymous online questionnaire. We stratified our population in 4 groups according to different generations that represent the Argentinean population: Centennials (18-25 years), Millennials (26-35 years), Gen X (36-49 years), Baby Boomers (more than 50 years), respectively. We also stratified our sample by gender, socioeconomic level, and geographic location. Main results and the role of chance The data obtained in our survey showed that 92% of our population expressed an agreement to the use of ART for heterosexual couples, 76% for single women, 65% for single men, 62% for female couples and 59% as to male couples. However, when stratifying by generations, we observed that the youngest showed a clear tendency to accept the new family conformation models with respect to the oldest ones. When comparing by generations, Centennials showed a strong agreement for single women (63%), single men (52%), female couples (60%) and male couples (58%). However, Baby Boomers express agreement on single women (33%), single men (24%), female partners (24%), male partners (22%). So, our data reveals that the prejudices concerning the different family conformations models are less among the youngest. We also observe a tendency towards believing that happiness is not related to parenthood by the younger (Centennials 75%, Millennials 67%, X Generation 64%, Baby Boomers 60%). This is a representative sample of the Argentinean populations, based upon official National census. Thus, it accurately represents the local distribution concerning age, gender, socioeconomic level, and geographic location. Limitations, reasons for caution Our investigation is a descriptive and observational study Wider implications of the findings This is the first study about new family models in Latin America. The study sample represents the national population and reflects clearly social trends. Therefore, it allows predicting future scenarios for policy makers to plan effective education strategies and to consider the distribution of public health funds for fertility treatments. Trial registration number not applicable

1979 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norman L. Thiesen ◽  
Benedict B. Cooley

The literature on the single male suggests that singleness is psychologically unhealthy and possibly even damaging. The California Psychological Inventory (CPI) and the Dean Alienation Scale were administered to single and married populations of seven evangelical churches in the Los Angeles area. The 233 subjects were all from 25–34 years of age and divided into four groups based on sex and marital status. The single men were found to report significantly less dominance, social presence, self-acceptance, communality, and intellectual efficiency than the married men. The single men did not significantly differ from the single women on any of the scales. It was concluded that while married men are more well-adjusted than single men, there is no difference between the adjustment of single men and women.


2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-139
Author(s):  
Maria Isabel Ventura Miranda ◽  
Jessica Garcia Gonzalez ◽  
Maria del mar Requena Mullor ◽  
Tesifon Parron Carreño ◽  
Raquel Alarcon Rodriguez

Author(s):  
Elisabeth van Houts

This chapter is devoted to the single life. First it contains a section devoted to the issue of consent: who gives consent for the entry into monastic life, parents or the child? This section is followed by a discussion on single women in monastic and lay environments. The final section is devoted to single men in lay and monastic environments. The majority of single men and women were held hostage by economic circumstances rather than their own agency or choice. The relatively small group of religious young men and women entered their future destination by a combination of parental choice and their own agency. The increase in texts charting the generational battle for consent should be seen firmly in the wider context of a demand for choice amongst young people, especially women.


2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Møller Danø ◽  
Mette Ejrnæs ◽  
Leif Husted

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie A. Grover ◽  
Ziva Shmorgun ◽  
Sergey I. Moskovtsev ◽  
Ari Baratz ◽  
Clifford L. Librach

Author(s):  
Mary Minten ◽  
Cass Dykeman

Relationship health impacts many other health outcomes, including physical and mental wellbeing and the health of children in the family system (Goeke-Morey, Cummings, & Papp, 2007; Jaremka, Glaser, Malarkey, & Kiecolt-Glaser, 2013; Jaremka, Lindgren, & Kiecolt-Glaser, 2013; Pihet, Bodenmann, Cina, Widmer, & Shantinath, 2007; Rappaport, 2013; Robles, Slatcher, Trombello, & McGinn, 2014). Despite the importance of relationship health, couples do not regularly seek support for maintaining their connection (Eubanks-Fleming & Cordova, 2012). Early intervention programs that provide support are a growing public health initiative (Cowan & Cowan, 2014). One brief early intervention program, the Marriage Checkup (MC), positively impacts relationship satisfaction, prevents decline, and improves health on other relationship variables such as intimacy (Cordova, 2014). To date, the MC research has included only heterosexual couples. This study explored the question, “What is the impact of a relationship wellness checkup on gay male couples’ relationship satisfaction?” Using single-subject multiple-baseline, multiple-probe design, this study extends MC research to include gay may couples. Findings showed that the MC positively influenced satisfaction (NAP .73) for the group overall. In an analysis of each couple, two of the three couples improved and one couple showed a slight decline in satisfaction. The likely confounding event for this third couple was their marriage and honeymoon during the baseline phase. In light of research with newlywed and engaged couples from other studies, overall the results tentatively suggest the MC may increase satisfaction for gay male couples with additional research needed for newlywed couples.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 35-48
Author(s):  
CAROLINA APACHE ◽  
◽  
PAOLA RINCON

This article aims to publicize how the concept of family has evolved from ancient times to modernity, it is confirmed that the first family that existed was the patriarchate where women were identified as slaves, with the passage of time women became he became independent from man until he survived by his own means and that is where matriarchy is known. Starting from this base, it is necessary to know its evolution in depth and understand the influence that society has had on the family, taking into account that the family is a basic organization in society since it affects the life of the family and its surroundings individuals From the modernity, the family undergoes a series of sociocultural changes which lead to new family models.


1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 413-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Tjaden ◽  
Nancy Thoennes ◽  
Christine J. Allison

Using data from a nationally representative telephone survey that was conducted from November 1995 to May 1996, this study compares lifetime experiences with violent victimization among men and women with a history of same-sex cohabitation and their counterparts with a history of marriage and/or opposite-sex cohabitation only. The study found that respondents who had lived with a same-sex intimate partner were significantly more likely than respondents who had married or lived with an opposite-sex partner only to have been: (a) raped as minors and adults; (b) physically assaulted as children by adult caretakers; and (c) physically assaulted as adults by all types of perpetrators, including intimate partners. The study also confirms previous reports that intimate partner violence is more prevalent among gay male couples than heterosexual couples. However, it contradicts reports that intimate partner violence is more prevalent among lesbian couples than heterosexual couples. Overall study findings suggest that intimate partner violence is perpetrated primarily by men, whether against same-sex or opposite-sex partners.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document