scholarly journals 956Cumulative low-tar exposure was still associated with increased lung cancer risk from Japanese case-control study

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiichi Shimatani ◽  
Hidemi Ito ◽  
Keitaro Matsuo ◽  
Kazuo Tajima ◽  
Toshiro Takezaki

Abstract Background Tar concentration in cigarette brands is chronologically decreasing in the USA and Japan. However, studies investigating lung cancer risk with cumulative tar exposure in Western and Asian countries are insufficient. To investigate the risk of lung cancer with cumulative cigarette tar exposure, we conducted a case-control study among Japanese current smokers. Methods This study used data from the US-Japan lung cancer joint study in 1993–1998. The number of the subjects was 282 histologically confirmed lung cancer cases and 162 hospital and 227 community controls, and two control groups were combined. The information regarding tar concentration was obtained from the published documents and additional estimation using the equation of regression. Cumulative tar concentration was calculated by multiplying the annual value of tar concentration by year and brand. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals for lung cancer with cumulative tar exposure were estimated using a logistic model. Results The OR with cumulative tar exposure was higher in higher exposed smokers (>45.6 × 105mg, 8.10, 4.74–13.7) than in lower exposed smokers (≤45.6 × 105mg, 3.37, 1.92–5.92), and increasing trend of the ORs was significant (p < 0.001). The stratification analysis showed higher ORs among those with higher cumulative tar exposure regardless of inhalation, duration of smoking filtered cigarettes, and histological type. Conclusions This study showed that cumulative tar exposure is a dose-dependent indicator for lung cancer risk, and low-tar exposure was still associated with increased cancer risk. Key messages Low-tar tobacco is still associated with increased lung cancer risk.

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (9) ◽  
pp. 1009-1017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiichi Shimatani ◽  
Hidemi Ito ◽  
Keitaro Matsuo ◽  
Kazuo Tajima ◽  
Toshiro Takezaki

Abstract Objective Tar concentration in cigarette brands is chronologically decreasing in the USA and Japan. However, studies investigating lung cancer risk with cumulative tar exposure in Western and Asian countries are insufficient. To investigate the risk of lung cancer with cumulative cigarette tar exposure, we conducted a case-control study among Japanese current smokers. Methods This study used data from the US-Japan lung cancer joint study in 1993–1998. A total of 282 subjects with histologically confirmed lung cancer and 162 hospital and 227 community controls were included in the study, and two control groups were combined. The information regarding tar concentration was obtained from the published documents and additional estimation using the equation of regression. Cumulative tar concentration was calculated by multiplying the annual value of brand-specific tar concentration by years of smoking. The odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for lung cancer with cumulative tar exposure were estimated using a logistic model. Results The odds ratios for lung cancer with both lower (1–59.8 × 105 mg) and higher (>59.8 × 105 mg) total cumulative tar exposure were statistically significant (3.81, 2.23–6.50 and 11.64, 6.56–20.67, respectively) with increasing trend (P < 0.001). The stratification analysis showed higher odds ratios in subjects with higher cumulative tar exposure regardless of inhalation, duration of smoking filtered cigarettes and histological type. Conclusions This study showed that cumulative tar exposure is a dose-dependent indicator for lung cancer risk, and low-tar exposure was still associated with increased cancer risk.


2004 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pagona Lagiou ◽  
Evi Samoli ◽  
Areti Lagiou ◽  
Klea Katsouyanni ◽  
Julia Peterson ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Valent�n Rodr�guez ◽  
Adonina Tard�n ◽  
Manolis Kogevinas ◽  
Carlos S. Prieto ◽  
Antonio Cueto ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 228-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard E. Thompson ◽  
Donald F. Nelson ◽  
Joel H. Popkin ◽  
Zenaida Popkin

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatriz Sanchez-Espiridion ◽  
Jian Gu ◽  
David W. Chang ◽  
Joe Y. Chang ◽  
Charles Lu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document