scholarly journals Simplified Chinese Abstracts*

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. H9-H11
Keyword(s):  
BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng KKF ◽  
S. A. Mitchell ◽  
N. Chan ◽  
E. Ang ◽  
W. Tam ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to translate and linguistically validate the U.S. National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE™) into Simplified Chinese for use in Singapore. Methods All 124 items of the English source PRO-CTCAE item library were translated into Simplified Chinese using internationally established translation procedures. Two rounds of cognitive interviews were conducted with 96 cancer patients undergoing adjuvant treatment to determine if the translations adequately captured the PRO-CTCAE source concepts, and to evaluate comprehension, clarity and ease of judgement. Interview probes addressed the 78 PRO-CTCAE symptom terms (e.g. fatigue), as well as the attributes (e.g. severity), response choices, and phrasing of ‘at its worst’. Items that met the a priori threshold of ≥20% of participants with comprehension difficulties were considered for rephrasing and retesting. Items where < 20% of the sample experienced comprehension difficulties were also considered for rephrasing if better phrasing options were available. Results A majority of PRO-CTCAE-Simplified Chinese items were well comprehended by participants in Round 1. One item posed difficulties in ≥20% and was revised. Two items presented difficulties in < 20% but were revised as there were preferred alternative phrasings. Twenty-four items presented difficulties in < 10% of respondents. Of these, eleven items were revised to an alternative preferred phrasing, four items were revised to include synonyms. Revised items were tested in Round 2 and demonstrated satisfactory comprehension. Conclusions PRO-CTCAE-Simplified Chinese has been successfully developed and linguistically validated in a sample of cancer patients residing in Singapore.


Spine ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Qi Jia ◽  
Yu-Jie Wu ◽  
Fan-Qi Hu ◽  
Zhen Zhang ◽  
Shi-Qi Cao ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 1599-1612 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Yu ◽  
Xiaoqin Zhu ◽  
Daniel T. L. Shek ◽  
Xiao-Bing Zou ◽  
Hong-Zhu Deng ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Volume 14 ◽  
pp. 35-40
Author(s):  
Yang Luo ◽  
Sisi Li ◽  
Jingting He ◽  
Dan Cai ◽  
Yi Dai ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
SHUDONG HAO ◽  
YANYAN XU ◽  
DENGFENG KE ◽  
KAILE SU ◽  
HENGLI PENG

AbstractWriting in language tests is regarded as an important indicator for assessing language skills of test takers. As Chinese language tests become popular, scoring a large number of essays becomes a heavy and expensive task for the organizers of these tests. In the past several years, some efforts have been made to develop automated simplified Chinese essay scoring systems, reducing both costs and evaluation time. In this paper, we introduce a system called SCESS (automated Simplified Chinese Essay Scoring System) based on Weighted Finite State Automata (WFSA) and using Incremental Latent Semantic Analysis (ILSA) to deal with a large number of essays. First, SCESS uses ann-gram language model to construct a WFSA to perform text pre-processing. At this stage, the system integrates a Confusing-Character Table, a Part-Of-Speech Table, beam search and heuristic search to perform automated word segmentation and correction of essays. Experimental results show that this pre-processing procedure is effective, with a Recall Rate of 88.50%, a Detection Precision of 92.31% and a Correction Precision of 88.46%. After text pre-processing, SCESS uses ILSA to perform automated essay scoring. We have carried out experiments to compare the ILSA method with the traditional LSA method on the corpora of essays from the MHK test (the Chinese proficiency test for minorities). Experimental results indicate that ILSA has a significant advantage over LSA, in terms of both running time and memory usage. Furthermore, experimental results also show that SCESS is quite effective with a scoring performance of 89.50%.


2013 ◽  
Vol 472 (5) ◽  
pp. 1545-1551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Zheng ◽  
Jia Li ◽  
Jinzhu Zhao ◽  
Denghui Liu ◽  
Weidong Xu

PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e30807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Honglei Yi ◽  
Xinran Ji ◽  
Xianzhao Wei ◽  
Ziqiang Chen ◽  
Xinhui Wang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document