scholarly journals Better hospital context increases success of care pathway implementation on achieving greater teamwork: a multicenter study on STEMI care

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 442-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daan Aeyels ◽  
Luk Bruyneel ◽  
Deborah Seys ◽  
Peter R Sinnaeve ◽  
Walter Sermeus ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate whether hospital context influences the effect of care pathway implementation on teamwork processes and output in STEMI care.DesignA multicenter pre–post intervention study.SettingEleven acute hospitals.ParticipantsCardiologists-in-chief, nurse managers, quality staff, quality managers and program managers reported on hospital context. Teamwork was rated by professional groups (medical doctors, nurses, allied health professionals, other) in the following departments: emergency room, catheterization lab, coronary care unit, cardiology ward and rehabilitation.InterventionCare pathway covering in-hospital care from emergency services to rehabilitation.Main outcome measuresHospital context was measured by the five dimensions of the Model for Understanding Success in Quality: microsystem, quality improvement team, quality improvement support, high-level organization, external environment. Teamwork process measures reflected teamwork between professional groups within departments and teamwork between departments. Teamwork output was measured through the level of organized care. Two-level regression analysis accounted for clustering of respondents within hospitals and assessed the influence of hospital context on the impact of care pathway implementation on teamwork.ResultsCare pathway implementation significantly improved teamwork processes both between professional groups (P < 0.001) and between departments (P < 0.001). Teamwork output also improved (P < 0.001). The effect of care pathway implementation on teamwork was more pronounced when the quality improvement team and quality improvement support and capacity were more positively reported on.ConclusionsHospitals can leverage the effect of quality improvement interventions such as care pathways by evaluating and improving aspects of hospital context.

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Claude Byiringiro ◽  
Rex Wong ◽  
Caroline Davis ◽  
Jeffery Williams ◽  
Joseph Becker ◽  
...  

Few case studies exist related to hospital accident and emergency department (A&E) quality improvement efforts in lowerresourced settings. We sought to report the impact of quality improvement principles applied to A&E overcrowding and flow in the largest referral and teaching hospital in Rwanda. A pre- and post-intervention study was conducted. A linked set of strategies included reallocating room space based on patient/visitor demand and flow, redirecting traffic, establishing a patient triage system and installing white boards to facilitate communication. Two months post-implementation, the average number of patients boarding in the A&E hallways significantly decreased from 28 (pre-intervention) to zero (post-intervention), p < .001. Foot traffic per dayshift hour significantly decreased from 221 people to 160 people (28%, p < .001), and non-A&E related foot traffic decreased from 81.4% to 36.3% (45% decrease, p < .001). One hundred percent of the A&E patients have been formally triaged since the implementation of the newly established triage system. Our project used quality improvement principles to reduce the number of patients boarding in the hallways and to decrease unnecessary foot traffic in the A&E department with little investment from the hospital. Key success factors included a collaborative multidisciplinary project team, strong internal champions, data-driven analysis, evidence-based interventions, senior leadership support, and rapid application of initial implementation learnings. Results to date show the application of quality improvement principles can help hospitals in resource-limited settings improve quality of care at relatively low cost.


Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason P Stopyra ◽  
Myron Waddell ◽  
Emily B Parks

Introduction: Historically, community hospitals have had few options for meaningful treatment of patients presenting with acute stroke. As expertise grows in the administration of thrombolytics, primary stroke centers (PSC) fulfill an important role in the reduction of morbidity and mortality related to stroke. It is important for the PSC to partner with Emergency Medical Services (EMS) to change historical perceptions of the quality of PSC care. Education may improve teamwork and increase awareness of the PSC, thereby increasing their utilization in EMS disposition decisions. Objective: The objective of this study is to report the impact of an education intervention on PSC bypass decisions. Methods: The electronic patient care record database from a North Carolina county EMS system was queried as a quality improvement analysis from January 1, 2012 to February 28, 2016. This included 19 months prior to the education intervention, the year during the education intervention, and 19 months after the education intervention. All primary patient transports with Stroke/CVA, or suspected TIA as the primary or secondary impression were included. Interfacility transports were excluded. The recorded call location was determined to either be inside or outside the PSC service area. The hospital the patient was transported to was also recorded. Results: During the pre-intervention phase 222 patients were identified, 48 of which originated in the PSC service area. Of those 48 patients, 16 bypassed the PSC (33.3%). In the post-intervention phase, 94 of 269 total patients were in PSC service area. Only 12 bypasses occurred (12.8%) which is a reduction of 61.7% in PSC bypass compared to the pre-intervention phase. Conclusion: The period following a combined hospital/EMS educational intervention showed significant reduction in PSC bypass.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ssebuufu Robinson ◽  
Victor Pawelzik ◽  
Abraham Megentta ◽  
Oswald Benimana ◽  
Damascene Mazimpaka ◽  
...  

Objective: While several studies have focused on improving the quality of surgery, less attention has been paid to reducing pre-operative delays in care. We undertook a hospital quality improvement (QI) effort to reduce pre-operative delays in a teaching hospital in Rwanda. Without a coordinated admission schedule, many surgical patients arriving at the hospital for admissions were turned away because of unavailable beds. For those admitted for surgery, the pre-operative waits were long.Methods: A pre- and post-intervention study was conducted to examine the impact of a QI effort on two metrics: 1) pre-operative length-of-stay (LOS) for elective surgical patients, and 2) the number of elective surgical patients who were turned away on the scheduled admission date. Intervention: A multi-disciplinary work group utilized a Strategic Problem Solving Approach and implemented a centralized patient wait list and new schedule process utilizing the existing resources available at the hospital.Results: The percentage of elective surgical patients with a pre-operative LOS of more than two days was significantly lower in the post-intervention compared with the pre-intervention period (80% versus 26.8%, p-value < .001). The percentage of scheduled patients who were turned away due unavailable inpatient beds significantly decreased from 63.4% to 5.3%, p-value < .001.Conclusions: By following a methodical strategic problem solving approach, the pre-operative LOS was reduced, elective surgical patients turned away due to unavailable beds was decreased at very low financial cost.


Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 1187
Author(s):  
Jungwon Cho ◽  
Sangmi Shin ◽  
Youngmi Jeong ◽  
Eunsook Lee ◽  
Soyeon Ahn ◽  
...  

Evaluation of sustainability after quality improvement (QI) projects in healthcare settings is an essential part of monitoring and future QI planning. With limitations in adopting quasi-experimental study design in real-world practice, healthcare professionals find it challenging to present the sustained effect of QI changes effectively. To provide quantitative methodological approaches for demonstrating the sustainability of QI projects for healthcare professionals, we conducted data analyses based on a QI project to improve the computerized provider order entry system to reduce patients’ dosing frequencies in Korea. Data were collected for 5 years: 24-month pre-intervention, 12-month intervention, and 24-month post-intervention. Then, analytic approaches including control chart, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), and segmented regression were performed. The control chart intuitively displayed how the outcomes changed over the entire period, and ANOVA was used to test whether the outcomes differed between groups. Last, segmented regression analysis was conducted to evaluate longitudinal effects of interventions over time. We found that the impact of QI projects in healthcare settings should be initiated following the Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle and evaluated long-term effects while widening the scope of QI evaluation with sustainability. This study can serve as a guide for healthcare professionals to use a number of statistical methodologies in their QI evaluations.


2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
BR Sakallaris ◽  
LS Halpin ◽  
M Knapp ◽  
MJ Sheridan

Early data from this project suggest that the RABBIT program fulfilled the process improvement goals of decreasing costs of cardiac surgery and maintaining high quality. Decreased cost was achieved by decreasing time to extubation and decreasing length of stay in the ICU and the total length of stay in the hospital. The cost savings were achieved without compromising the quality of care, which was assessed by measuring rates of readmission to the ICU and to the hospital and by surveying patients about their level of satisfaction. The success of the RABBIT program can be attributed to several factors. First, members of the cardiac surgery quality improvement team worked well together to solve problems and overcome obstacles, particularly after the pilot program. Second, naming the program helped to motivate staff, physicians, and patients. Outcome data was shared with the staff quarterly, and successes were celebrated. Finally, the use of a facilitator early in the process to establish the process with the surgeons and the staff was invaluable. Opportunities for continued improvement include resolving operational difficulties related to availability of beds and staffing, continuing work with physicians in changing practice patterns, increasing efficiency in scheduling operating rooms, and adjusting the preoperative education provided to patients and their families about the length of stay to expect. Quarterly outcome analysis continues, with reports to the cardiac surgery quality improvement team. The team continues to explore creative solutions to the aforementioned issues, as the goal of having 25% of patients who undergo cardiac surgery be transferred to the CTU on the day of surgery has remained elusive.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document