Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridioides difficile isolated from diarrhoeal stool specimens of Canadian patients: summary of results from the Canadian Clostridioides difficile (CAN-DIFF) surveillance study from 2013 to 2017

2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (7) ◽  
pp. 1824-1832
Author(s):  
James A Karlowsky ◽  
Heather J Adam ◽  
Melanie R Baxter ◽  
Christopher W Dutka ◽  
Kim A Nichol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Surveillance Study ◽  
Dilution Method ◽  
Agar Dilution Method ◽  
In Vitro Susceptibility ◽  
Ribotype 027 ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Vancomycin Mics ◽  
Stool Specimens

Abstract Objectives To summarize data generated by the Canadian Clostridioides difficile (CAN-DIFF) surveillance study from 2013 to 2017. Methods Isolates of C. difficile (n = 2158) were cultured from toxin-positive diarrhoeal stool specimens submitted by eight hospital laboratories to a coordinating laboratory. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed according to the CLSI agar dilution method (M11, 2018). Isolate ribotypes were determined using an international, standardized, high-resolution capillary gel-based electrophoresis protocol. Results Of the 2158 isolates of C. difficile, 2133 (98.8%) had vancomycin MICs ≤2 mg/L [i.e. were vancomycin susceptible (EUCAST breakpoint tables, v 9.0, 2019) or WT (CLSI M100, 29th edition, 2019)]. Fidaxomicin MICs were lower than those of all other agents tested (MIC90, 0.5 mg/L); however, one isolate with a fidaxomicin MIC of >8 mg/L was identified. Metronidazole MICs ranged from 0.12 to 4 mg/L; all isolates were metronidazole susceptible by the CLSI breakpoint (≤8 mg/L) compared with 96.8% susceptible by the EUCAST breakpoint (≤2 mg/L). In total, 182 different ribotypes were identified from 2013 to 2017. The most common ribotypes identified were 027 (19.3% of isolates) and 106 (8.2%). Ribotype 027 isolates were frequently moxifloxacin resistant (87.3% of isolates) and MDR (48.6%), associated with vancomycin (10/25, 40.0%) and metronidazole (58/69, 84.1%) resistance and from patients aged ≥80 years. The prevalence of ribotype 027 decreased significantly (P < 0.0001) from 2013 (27.5%) to 2017 (9.0%) and was replaced by increases in ribotype 106 (P = 0.0003) and multiple less common ribotypes. Conclusions Periodic surveillance is required to monitor clinical isolates of C. difficile for changes to in vitro susceptibility testing profiles and ribotype evolution.

scholarly journals Broth Microdilution and Gradient Diffusion Strips vs. Reference Agar Dilution Method: First Evaluation for Clostridiales Species Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 975
Author(s):  
Florian Baquer ◽  
Asma Ali Sawan ◽  
Michel Auzou ◽  
Antoine Grillon ◽  
Benoît Jaulhac ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Dilution Method ◽  
Agar Dilution Method ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Multicenter Studies ◽  
Gradient Diffusion ◽  
Agar Dilution

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobes is challenging. Because MIC determination is recommended by both CLSI and EUCAST, commercial broth microdilution and diffusion strip tests have been developed. The reliability of broth microdilution methods has not been assessed yet using the agar dilution reference method. In this work, we evaluated two broth microdilution kits (MICRONAUT-S Anaerobes® MIC and Sensititre Anaerobe MIC®) and one gradient diffusion strip method (Liofilchem®) for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 47 Clostridiales isolates (Clostridium, Clostridioides and Hungatella species) using the agar dilution method as a reference. The evaluation focused on comparing six antimicrobial molecules available in both microdilution kits. Analytical performances were evaluated according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendations. Essential agreements (EA) and categorical agreements (CA) varied greatly according to the molecule and the evaluated method. Vancomycin had values of essential and categorical agreements above 90% for the three methods. The CA fulfilled the FDA criteria for three major molecules in the treatment of Gram-positive anaerobic infections (metronidazole, piperacillin/tazobactam and vancomycin). The highest rate of error was observed for clindamycin. Multicenter studies are needed to further validate these results.

scholarly journals Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of thermophilic campylobacters isolated from patients in the town of Nis

2009 ◽  
Vol 66 (7) ◽  
pp. 522-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biljana Miljkovic-Selimovic ◽  
Tatjana Babic ◽  
Branislava Kocic ◽  
Ljiljana Ristic
Keyword(s):  
Nalidixic Acid ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Dilution Method ◽  
Agar Dilution Method ◽  
Thermophilic Campylobacter ◽  
Agar Dilution ◽  
High Level ◽  
Susceptibility Profiles ◽  
The Town

Background/Aim. In some clinical forms of human Campylobacter infections, such as prolonged diarrhea or associated with postinfections sequels, antibacterial treatment is necessary. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic Campylobacter strains isolated from patients with diarrhea, as well as from patients with diarrhea followed by postinfections sequels, to drugs used in the therapy of enterocolitis, and to nalidixic acid used in laboratory identification and differentiation of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. Methods. We studied the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of 131 Campylobacter strains isolated from patients with diarrhea (122 strains), diarrhea associated with rheumatic disorders (8 strains), and one strain isolated from a patient with Guillain-Barr? Syndrome following Campylobacter enterocolitis. Susceptibility testing to erythromycin, gentamicin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid was performed by the agar dilution method. Results. In the strains we investigated, resistance to gentamicin and chloramphenicol was not recorded, whereas a low rate of strains resistant to erythromycin (2.4%), a higher prevalence of strains resistant to tetracycline (9.9%), and a high level of resistance to ciprofloxacin (29.8%) and nalidixic acid (33.3%) were registered. All strains resistant to nalidixic acid were also resistant to ciprofloxacin. In addition, there was no difference in the occurrence of resistance between strains isolated from patients with diarrhea as compared to those isolated from patients with diarrhea followed by postinfection disorders. Conclusion. The fact that the most of Campylobacter strains were sensitive to erythromycin and all to gentamicin, makes erythromycin an antibiotic of choice in the treatment of Campylobacter diarrhea and gentamicin when parenteral therapy should be administered. Resistance to tetracycline and, especially, ciprofloxacin, necessitates antibiotic susceptibility testing.

scholarly journals Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori Determined by the E Test Using Tetrazolium Egg Yolk Agar

1998 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 2784-2785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanet Valdez ◽  
Billie Velapatiño ◽  
Robert H. Gilman ◽  
Vilma Gutierrez ◽  
Carlos León
Keyword(s):  
Helicobacter Pylori ◽  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Agar Medium ◽  
Egg Yolk ◽  
Blood Agar ◽  
Dilution Method ◽  
Agar Dilution Method ◽  
Agar Dilution ◽  
H Pylori

Metronidazole and tetracycline E tests were compared to an agar dilution method for the antimicrobial susceptibility testing ofHelicobacter pylori. Sixteen strains were tested by using tetrazolium egg yolk (TEY) agar. The characteristic E test inhibition ellipse was clearer on TEY agar than on standard blood agar and gave results comparable to those of the agar dilution test. The use of TEY medium is preferable to that of blood agar medium in E test MIC determinations for H. pylori.

scholarly journals In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of Gram-Positive Anaerobic Cocci Responsible for Human Invasive Infections

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 1665
Author(s):  
François Guérin ◽  
Loren Dejoies ◽  
Nicolas Degand ◽  
Hélène Guet-Revillet ◽  
Frédéric Janvier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Susceptibility ◽  
Dilution Method ◽  
Agar Dilution Method ◽  
Gram Positive ◽  
In Vitro Susceptibility ◽  
Parvimonas Micra ◽  
Invasive Infections ◽  
Anaerobic Infections ◽  
Susceptibility Profiles

The aim of this multicentre study was to determine the in vitro susceptibility to anti-anaerobic antibiotics of Gram-positive anaerobic cocci (GPAC) isolates responsible for invasive infections in humans. A total of 133 GPAC isolates were collected in nine French hospitals from 2016 to 2020. All strains were identified to the species level (MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, 16S rRNA sequencing). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of amoxicillin, piperacillin, cefotaxime, imipenem, clindamycin, vancomycin, linezolid, moxifloxacin, rifampicin, and metronidazole were determined by the reference agar dilution method. Main erm-like genes were detected by PCR. The 133 GPAC isolates were identified as follows: 10 Anaerococcus spp., 49 Finegoldia magna, 33 Parvimonas micra, 30 Peptoniphilus spp., and 11 Peptostreptococcus anaerobius. All isolates were susceptible to imipenem, vancomycin (except 3 P. micra), linezolid and metronidazole. All isolates were susceptible to amoxicillin and piperacillin, except for P. anaerobius (54% and 45% susceptibility only, respectively). MICs of cefotaxime widely varied while activity of rifampicin, and moxifloxacin was also variable. Concerning clindamycin, 31 were categorized as resistant (22 erm(A) subclass erm(TR), 7 erm(B), 1 both genes and 1 negative for tested erm genes) with MICs from 8 to >32 mg/L. Although GPACs are usually susceptible to drugs commonly used for the treatment of anaerobic infections, antimicrobial susceptibility should be evaluated in vitro.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document