scholarly journals Doctors documenting: an ethnographic and informatics approach to understanding attending physician documentation in the pediatric emergency department

Author(s):  
Sarah D Fouquet ◽  
Laura Fitzmaurice ◽  
Y Raymond Chan ◽  
Evan M Palmer

Abstract Objective The pediatric emergency department is a highly complex and evolving environment. Despite the fact that physicians spend a majority of their time on documentation, little research has examined the role of documentation in provider workflow. The aim of this study is to examine the task of attending physician documentation workflow using a mixed-methods approach including focused ethnography, informatics, and the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model as a theoretical framework. Materials and Methods In a 2-part study, we conducted a hierarchical task analysis of patient flow, followed by a survey of documenting ED providers. The second phase of the study included focused ethnographic observations of ED attendings which included measuring interruptions, time and motion, documentation locations, and qualitative field notes. This was followed by analysis of documentation data from the electronic medical record system. Results Overall attending physicians reported low ratings of documentation satisfaction; satisfaction after each shift was associated with busyness and resident completion. Documentation occurred primarily in the provider workrooms, however strategies such as bedside documentation, dictation, and multitasking with residents were observed. Residents interrupted attendings more often but also completed more documentation actions in the electronic medical record. Discussion Our findings demonstrate that complex work processes such as documentation, cannot be measured with 1 single data point or statistical analysis but rather a combination of data gathered from observations, surveys, comments, and thematic analyses. Conclusion Utilizing a sociotechnical systems framework and a mixed-methods approach, this study provides a holistic picture of documentation workflow. This approach provides a valuable foundation not only for researchers approaching complex healthcare systems but also for hospitals who are considering implementing large health information technology projects.

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 88 (5) ◽  
pp. 1076-1076
Author(s):  
HAROLD K. SIMON

In a recent article in Pediatrics, "Professional Liability in a Pediatric Emergency Department" by Reynolds et al, one of the major conclusions is that a disproportionate number of claims occurs when an attending physician is not present in the emergency department. Their conclusions from the facts that 46% of the claims arise from midnight to 8:00 AM when an attending physician is not present, while approximately 8% of total visits occur during this period, are as follows: "It may be that parents had higher expectations at 3:00 AM compared with 10:00 AM or that parents perceived the physician to be less experienced and less self-confident.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally L. Reynolds ◽  
David Jaffe ◽  
William Glynn

The risk of professional liability resulting from care given in the pediatric emergency department is a growing concern. This retrospective study examined the patients, diagnoses, and outcome of all threatened and actual claims that originated in the emergency department of a pediatric teaching hospital from 1977 through 1988. Twenty-five cases were identified by the hospital risk manager from approximately 320 000 visits (8.0 cases/100 000 visits); 22 charts were available for review. Ages of the patients ranged from 2 weeks to 13 years (mean 2.9 years, median 3.0 years). The patients' payment status was private insurance (n = 10), state public aid (n = 5), and no third-party payment source was listed for 7 children. Ten patients (46%) visited the emergency department between midnight and 8:00 AM, when an attending physician was not present. Return visits within 2 weeks for the same complaint occurred in 10 cases. The majority of the patients were discharged home (n = 18), and all of them had appropriate, adequately documented discharge instructions. The final diagnoses fell into four general categories: minor trauma/abuse (n = 7), neoplasms/chronic illnesses (n = 7), infectious diseases (n = 6), and appendicitis (n = 2). Review of the charts before knowledge of the legal outcome raised quality-of-care issues in 41% of the cases (n = 9). The legal claims were categorized as failure to diagnose (n = 16) and inappropriate treatment (n = 6). No claims went to trial, 12 were dropped by the family, 5 patients received some payment, 3 claims were unfounded, and 2 cases remain open. Legal fees incurred in 16 cases over the 10-year period totaled $191 677, and the total payment to families was $43 850. Conclusions: (1) malpractice claims were uncommon in the emergency department studied; (2) a disproportionate number of claims occurred when an attending physician was not in the emergency department; (3) no one specific diagnosis was overrepresented in the majority of claims; (4) visiting the emergency department more than once for the same complaint increased the risk of professional liability; and (5) the cost of the associated legal fees was more than four times the money paid to families.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document