scholarly journals Determination of Starch, Including Maltooligosaccharides, in Animal Feeds: Comparison of Methods and a Method Recommended for AOAC Collaborative Study

2009 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary B Hall
Keyword(s):  
Dry Matter ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Acetate Buffer ◽  
Sample Handling ◽  
Animal Feeds ◽  
Heat Stable ◽  
Replacement Method ◽  
Aoac Method

Abstract Starch is a nutritionally important carbohydrate in feeds that is increasingly measured and used for formulation of animal diets. Discontinued production of the enzyme Rhozyme-S required for AOAC Method 920.40 invalidated this method for starch in animal feeds. The objective of this study was to compare methods for the determination of starch as potential candidates as a replacement method and for an AOAC collaborative study. Many starch methods are available, but they vary in accuracy, replicability, and ease of use. After assays were evaluated that differed in gelatinization method, number of reagents, and sample handling, and after assays with known methodological defects were excluded, 3 enzymaticcolorimetric assays were selected for comparison. The assays all used 2-stage, heat-stable, -amylase and amyloglucosidase hydrolyses, but they differed in the gelatinization solution (heating in water, 3-(N-morpholino) propanesulfonic acid buffer, or acetate buffer). The measured values included both starch and maltooligosaccharides. The acetate buffer-only method was performed in sealable vessels with dilution by weight; it gave greater starch values (26 percentage units of sample dry matter) in the analysis of feed/food substrates than did the other methods. This method is a viable candidate for a collaborative study.

Determination of Dietary Starch in Animal Feeds and Pet Food by an Enzymatic-Colorimetric Method: Collaborative Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 397-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Beth Hall ◽  
J Arbaugh ◽  
K Binkerd ◽  
A Carlson ◽  
T Doan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Starch Content ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Colorimetric Method ◽  
Poultry Feed ◽  
Separate Determination ◽  
Fermentation Products ◽  
Animal Feeds ◽  
Aoac Method ◽  
Dietary Starch

Abstract Starch, glycogen, maltooligosaccharides, and other α-1,4- and α-1,6-linked glucose carbohydrates, exclusive of resistant starch, are collectively termed "dietary starch". This nutritionally important fraction is increasingly measured for use in diet formulation for animals as it can have positive or negative effects on animal performance and health by affecting energy supply, glycemic index, and formation of fermentation products by gut microbes. AOAC Method 920.40 that was used for measuring dietary starch in animal feeds was invalidated due to discontinued production of a required enzyme. As a replacement, an enzymatic-colorimetric starch assay developed in 1997 that had advantages in ease of sample handling and accuracy compared to other methods was considered. The assay was further modified to improve utilization of laboratory resources and reduce time required for the assay. The assay is quasi-empirical: glucose is the analyte detected, but its releaseis determined by run conditions and specification ofenzymes. The modified assay was tested in an AOAC collaborative study to evaluate its accuracy and reliability for determination of dietary starch in animalfeedstuffs and pet foods. In the assay, samples are incubated in screw cap tubes with thermostable α-amylase in pH 5.0 sodium acetate buffer for 1 h at 100°C with periodic mixing to gelatinize and partially hydrolyze α-glucan. Amyloglucosidase is added, and the reaction mixture is incubatedat 50°C for 2 h and mixed once. After subsequent addition of water, mixing, clarification, and dilution as needed, free + enzymatically released glucose are measured. Values from a separate determination of free glucose are subtracted to give values forenzymatically released glucose. Dietary starch equals enzymatically released glucose multiplied by 162/180 (or 0.9) divided by the weight of the as receivedsample. Fifteen laboratories that represented feed company, regulatory, research, and commercial feed testing laboratories analyzed 10 homogenous test materials representing animal feedstuffs and pet foods induplicate using the dietary starch assay. The test samples ranged from 1 to 70% in dietary starch content and included moist canned dog food, alfalfa pellets, distillers grains, ground corn grain, poultry feed, low starch horse feed, dry dog kibbles, complete dairy cattle feed, soybean meal, and corn silage.Theaverage within-laboratory repeatability SD (sr) for percentage dietary starch in the test samples was 0.49 with a range of 0.03 to 1.56, and among-laboratory repeatability SDs (sR) averaged 0.96 with a range of 0.09 to 2.69. The HorRat averaged 2.0 for all test samples and 1.9 for test samples containing greater than 2% dietary starch. The HorRat results are comparable to those found for AOAC Method 996.11, which measures starch in cereal products. It is recommended that the dietary starch method be accepted for Official First Action status.

Determination of Total, Soluble, and Insoluble Dietary Fiber in Foods—Enzymatic-Gravimetric Method, MES-TRIS Buffer: Collaborative Study

1992 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sungsoo C Lee ◽  
Leon Prosky ◽  
Jonathan W De Vries
Keyword(s):  
Dietary Fiber ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Gravimetric Method ◽  
Tris Buffer ◽  
Total Dietary Fiber ◽  
Method Performance ◽  
Insoluble Dietary Fiber ◽  
Heat Stable ◽  
Assay Precision

Abstract A joint AOAC/AACC (American Association of Cereal Chemists) collaborative study of methods for the determination of soluble, insoluble, and total dietary fiber (SDF, IDF, and TDF) was conducted with 11 participating laboratories. The assay Is based on a modification of the AOAC TDF method 985.29 and the SDF/IDF method collaboratively studied recently by AOAC. The principles of the method are the same as those for the AOAC dietary fiber methods 985.29 and 991.42, Including the use of the same 3 enzymes (heat-stable α-amylase, protease, and amyloglucosldase) and similar enzyme Incubation conditions. In the modification, minor changes have been made to reduce analysis time and to Improve assay precision: (1) MES-TRIS buffer replaces phosphate buffer; (2) one pH adjustment step Is eliminated; and (3) total volumes of reaction mixture and filtration are reduced. Eleven collaborators were sent 20 analytical samples (4 cereal and grain products, 3 fruits, and 3 vegetables) for duplicate blind analysis. The SDF, IDF, and TDF content of the foods tested ranged from 0.53 to 7.17, 0.59 to 60.53, and 1.12 to 67.56 g/100 g, respectively. The respective average RSDR values for SDF, IDF, and TDF determinations by direct measurements were 13.1, 5.2, and 4.5%. The TDF values calculated by summing SDF and IDF were in excellent agreement with the TDF values measured independently. The modification did not alter the method performance with regard to mean dietary fiber values, yet It generated lower assay variability compared with the unmodified methods. The method for SDF, IDF, and TDF (by summing SDF and IDF) has been adopted first action by AOAC International.

Collaborative Study of the Quantitative Gas-Liquid Chromatographic Determination of Fusel Oil and Other Components in Whisky

1972 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 549-556
Author(s):  
J H Kahn ◽  
E T Blessinger
Keyword(s):  
Ethyl Acetate ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Chromatographic Determination ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Fusel Oil ◽  
Fusel Alcohols ◽  
Aoac Method ◽  
Liquid Chromatographic Determination ◽  
Liquid Chromatographic

Abstract Fifteen chemists participated in a collaborative study for the quantitative pas-liquid chromatographic determination of the individual fusel alcohols and ethyl acetate in whisky. Two levels of congeners represented by 4 coded samples of whisky were analyzed by using t h e proposed method, employing a glycerol-1,2,6-hexanetriol column, and the official AOAC method, 9.063-9.065. Since isobutyl and the atnyl alcohols comprise by far the greatest part of fusel oil, their determination is of major importance to the total fusel oil content . Statistical analyses show that the proposed method is superior to the AOAC method for the determination of these alcohols, whereas the official method is superior for the determination of ethyl acetate and n-propyl alcohol. In general, collaborators employing modern instrumentation preferred the proposed method over the AOAC method. The former method also separates and permits the quantitative measurement of active amyl and isoamyl alcohols. The proposed method has been adopted as official first action as an alternative to 9.063–9.065 for the determination of higher alcohols and ethyl acetate in whisky.

Collaborative Study of the Determination of Phosphorus in Gelatin, Dessert Preparations, and Mixes

1972 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 581-582
Author(s):  
Roger G Burkepile
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Standard Samples ◽  
Preliminary Work ◽  
Aoac Method ◽  
Standard Deviations

Abstract A collaborative study of the proposed method for phosphorus in gelatin, dessert preparations, and mixes has been conducted. The present AOAC method for phosphorus in fertilizers, 2.023–2.025(a), was modified for this study. Preliminary work by the Associate Referee involving 4 phosphorus standard samples compared the proposed method with the official final action AOAC method for gelatin, 23.004. Additionally, phosphorus standard spikes in gelatin at the 1 and 10 mg P2O5, levels were determined by the proposed method. The proposed method is faster and more sensitive than the official method and is as accurate. Five collaborators and the Associate Referee analyzed 4 prepared samples containing various levels of phosphorus by the proposed method. The standard deviations varied from 0.005 for a 225 Bloom gelatin containing an average of 0.273% P2O5 to 0.016 for a strawberry-flavored commercial gelatin with added lecithin containing an average of 0.110% P2O5. The proposed method has been adopted as official first action to replace 23.004, which was repealed, official first action.

Determination of Geotrichum Mold in Comminuted Fruits and Vegetables: Collaborative Study

1982 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 1095-1096
Author(s):  
Stanley M Cichowicz ◽  
Ruth Bandler ◽  
◽  
R Bandler ◽  
G Dzidowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Violet ◽  
Fruits And Vegetables ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Green Beans ◽  
Aoac Method ◽  
Tomato Products

Abstract The official AOAC method for determination of Geotrichum mold in canned fruits and vegetables (44.079) requires a series of 3 sieves, Nos. 8, 16, and 230, to separate the packing liquid from the product and the mold from the packing liquid. Although this method has been successful for whole or coarsely chopped products (e.g., green beans, potatoes, carrots, and beets), finely divided products such as fruit purees and tomato products tend to clog the sieves. A method was developed in which the product is centrifuged, diluted by volume, stained with crystal violet, and counted with the sieving steps eliminated. The proposed method was adopted official first action.

scholarly journals Determination of Decoquinate in Animal Feeds by Liquid Chromatography: Collaborative Study

2008 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 685-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anivis A Sanchez ◽  
Harold M Campbell ◽  
M S Ahmed ◽  
K Albert ◽  
C Applegate ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Study ◽  
The United States ◽  
Reversed Phase ◽  
Excitation Wavelength ◽  
Mechanical Agitation ◽  
Trace Level ◽  
Animal Feeds ◽  
Relative Standard ◽  
Liquid Chromatographic

Abstract The performance characteristics of a liquid chromatographic (LC) method for the analysis of decoquinate (DEC) in supplements, premixes, and complete animal feeds at medicating and trace levels were collaboratively studied. DEC is extracted from ground feed samples with 1 calcium chloridemethanol solution using mechanical agitation for 90 min. After centrifugation for 5 min and dilution (if necessary), an aliquot of the extract is diluted with water. The diluted extracts are filtered and analyzed by reversed-phase LC with fluorescence detection. Suspect positive trace-level samples are confirmed by using an alternate excitation wavelength. Fourteen test samples of medicated feeds, supplement, and medicated premix, along with 8 test samples for trace-level analysis, were sent to 13 collaborators (one in Canada, 4 in Europe, and 8 in the United States). Test samples were analyzed as blind duplicates. Acceptable results were received from 12 laboratories for the medicated test samples and from 13 laboratories for the trace-level samples. Repeatability relative standard deviation estimates ranged from 1.3 to 5.6. Reproducibility relative standard deviations estimates ranged from 2.8 to 6.1, and HorRat values ranged from 0.22 to 0.74.

Comparison of Methods for Determining Sodium in Fertilizers

1981 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 704-708
Author(s):  
Luis F Corominas ◽  
Víctor M Boy ◽  
Pedro Rojas
Keyword(s):  
Phosphate Rock ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Ammonium Oxalate ◽  
Selective Electrode ◽  
Accuracy And Precision ◽  
Flame Emission ◽  
Aoac Method ◽  
Aoac Official ◽  
Aas Method

Abstract The AOAC official first action method, 2.147-2.150, for flame emission spectrophotometry (FES) determination of sodium in fertilizers was compared with the atomic absorption spectrophotometric (AAS) method and the sodium selective electrode (SSE) method. Ammonium oxalate, which was previously compared with water, H2SO4, HC1, and HNO3, was used to extract the sample for all 3 methods. Three synthetic NPK samples, 3 commercial samples (urea, normal superphosphate, and neutrophos), 1 phosphate rock, and 2 Magruder check samples were used for the study. Statistically significant differences were obtained in averages for most of the samples, but few differences were found in standard deviations. The AAS method showed the best accuracy and precision. Accuracy of the AOAC method is acceptable. The SSE method showed the highest deviations from the theoretical values. A collaborative study is recommended to compare the AOAC with the AAS method.

Gas Chromatographic Methods for Determination of γ-BHC in Technical Emulsifiable Concentrates and Water-Dispersible Powder Formulations and in Lindane Shampoo and Lotion: Collaborative Study

1984 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 834-837
Author(s):  
James W Miles ◽  
Dwight L Mount ◽  
◽  
T J Beckmann ◽  
S K Carrigan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coefficient Of Variation ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Internal Standard ◽  
The Other ◽  
Water Dispersible ◽  
Coefficients Of Variation ◽  
Aoac Method ◽  
Liquid Chromatographic ◽  
Gas Chromatographic Separation

Abstract Although the gas chromatographic separation of the isomers of BHC was demonstrated two decades ago, the present AOAC method of analysis of BHC for gamma-isomer (lindane) content is based on a separation carried out on a liquid chromatographic partition column. A method of analysis has been developed that uses an OV-210 column for separation of the gamma-isomer from the other isomers and impurities in technical BHC. Di-n-propyl phthalate was chosen as an internal standard. The same system allows quantitation of lindane in lotion and shampoo after these products are extracted with ethyl acetate-isooctane (1 + 4). The analytical methods were subjected to a collaborative trial with 10 laboratories. The coefficient of variation for technical BHC was 2.83%. For the water-dispersible powder and emulsifiable concentrate, the coefficients of variation were 2.89% and 4.62%, respectively. Coefficients of variation for 1% lindane lotion and shampoo were 4.36% and 11.92%, respectively. The method has been adopted official first action.

Determination of the Iodine Value of Oils and Fats: Summary of Collaborative Study

1994 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 674-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Firestone
Keyword(s):  
Acetic Acid ◽  
Iodine Value ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Solvent Mixture ◽  
Acid Mixture ◽  
Collaborative Studies ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Aoac Method ◽  
Iodine Values

Abstract Two collaborative studies were conducted using the Wijs method for determining the iodine value in a wide range of vegetable and animal oils and fats. The results obtained when using carbon tetrachlo-ride were compared to those obtained when using a substitute solvent mixture of cyclohexane and glacial acetic acid. The values reported for the iodine values indicate that the cyclohexane and acetic acid mixture can be used in place of carbon tetrachloride without loss of precision. The method has been adopted first action by AOAC INTERNATIONAL as an IUPAC/AOCS/AOAC method.

Determination of Paralytic Shellfish Toxins in Shellfish by Receptor Binding Assay: Collaborative Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 795-812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances M Van Dolah ◽  
Spencer E Fire ◽  
Tod A Leighfield ◽  
Christina M Mikulski ◽  
Gregory J Doucette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
East Coast ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Hplc Method ◽  
Mouse Bioassay ◽  
Sea Scallop ◽  
Paralytic Shellfish Toxins ◽  
Paralytic Shellfish ◽  
Aoac Method ◽  
The U.S

Abstract A collaborative study was conducted on a microplate format receptor binding assay (RBA) for paralytic shellfish toxins (PST). The assay quantifies the composite PST toxicity in shellfish samples based on the ability of sample extracts to compete with 3H saxitoxin (STX) diHCl for binding to voltage- gated sodium channels in a rat brain membrane preparation. Quantification of binding can be carried out using either a microplate or traditional scintillation counter; both end points were included in this study. Nine laboratories from six countries completed the study. One laboratory analyzed the samples using the precolumn oxidation HPLC method (AOAC Method 2005.06) to determine the STX congener composition. Three laboratories performed the mouse bioassay (AOAC Method 959.08). The study focused on the ability of the assay to measure the PST toxicity of samples below, near, or slightly above the regulatory limit of 800 (μg STX diHCl equiv./kg). A total of 21 shellfish homogenates were extracted in 0.1 M HCl, and the extracts were analyzed by RBA in three assays on separate days. Samples included naturally contaminated shellfish samples of different species collected from several geographic regions, which contained varying STX congener profiles due to their exposure to different PST-producing dinoflagellate species or differences in toxin metabolism: blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) from the U.S. east and west coasts, California mussel (Mytilus californianus) from the U.S. west coast, chorito mussel (Mytilus chiliensis) from Chile, green mussel (Perna canaliculus) from New Zealand, Atlantic surf clam (Spisula solidissima) from the U.S. east coast, butter clam (Saxidomus gigantea) from the west coast of the United States, almeja clam (Venus antiqua) from Chile, and Atlantic sea scallop (Plactopecten magellanicus) from the U.S. east coast. All samples were provided as whole animal homogenates, except Atlantic sea scallop and green mussel, from which only the hepatopancreas was homogenized. Among the naturally contaminated samples, five were blind duplicates used for calculation of RSDr. The interlaboratory RSDR of the assay for 21 samples tested in nine laboratories was 33.1%, yielding a HorRat value of 2.0. Removal of results for one laboratory that reported systematically low values resulted in an average RSDR of 28.7% and average HorRat value of 1.8. Intralaboratory RSDr, based on five blind duplicate samples tested in separate assays, was 25.1%. RSDr obtained by individual laboratories ranged from 11.8 to 34.9%. Laboratories that are routine users of the assay performed better than nonroutine users, with an average RSDr of 17.1%. Recovery of STX from spiked shellfish homogenates was 88.1–93.3%. Correlation with the mouse bioassay yielded a slope of 1.64 and correlation coefficient (r2) of 0.84, while correlation with the precolumn oxidation HPLC method yielded a slope of 1.20 and an r2 of 0.92. When samples were sorted according to increasing toxin concentration (μg STX diHCl equiv./kg) as assessed by the mouse bioassay, the RBA returned no false negatives relative to the 800 μg STX diHCl equiv./kg regulatory limit for shellfish. Currently, no validated methods other than the mouse bioassay directly measure a composite toxic potency for PST in shellfish. The results of this interlaboratory study demonstrate that the RBA is suitable for the routine determination of PST in shellfish in appropriately equipped laboratories.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document