124 Autologous Skin Cell Suspension Achieves Closure of Donor Site Wounds Facilitating Early Re-harvesting for Large TBSA burn Injuries

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S83-S84
Author(s):  
Kevin N Foster ◽  
Joseph Molnar ◽  
William L Hickerson ◽  
Jeanne Lee ◽  
Brett C Hartman ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Management of extensive burn injuries is complicated often resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Current standard of care includes use of split-thickness skin grafts (STSG) to obtain definitive closure; however, this treatment is often limited by donor site availability, which requires repeated re-harvesting of donor sites to obtain definitive closure in large total body surface area injuries. Additionally, this limitation often leads to increased risk of infection, hypertrophic scarring, and extended hospital length of stay. Autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) prepared using the autologous cell harvesting device is an FDA approved point-of-care regenerative medicine technology that significantly reduces donor skin requirements to achieve definitive closure in acute thermal burn injuries across small and large burns. A prospective uncontrolled observational study (IDE 15945—NCT02992249) was conducted in which patients with life-threatening burn injuries were treated with ASCS. In this study, clinical outcomes were evaluated when ASCS was used in combination with wide meshed autografts for burn site treatment. Within the study, a subset of donor sites was also treated with ASCS and the purpose of the current work was to evaluate the clinical outcomes obtained to better understand impact on healing times and effect of re-harvesting in this compromised patient population. Methods ASCS was applied to the donor site after harvesting of split-thickness skin grafts. Clinical outcomes out to one year were evaluated, including the percentage of re-epithelialization, long-term cosmetic outcomes, and adverse events. Results Subjects (n=96) from 22 burn centers received ASCS as part of their donor site treatment regimen (n=528). Mean subject baseline demographics were: 30.2 years of age, 54.0 ± 17.4% TBSA injury, and 89.4 ± 32.9 Baux score with 37% of subjects having a score greater than 100. Percentage of donor sites healed, defined as >95% re-epithelialization, was 37.1% and 82.7% after week 1 and week 2, respectively. Approximately 20% of the donor sites treated with ASCS were re-harvested multiple times following initial healing (up to four times). Of these donor sites 39.3% (n=84), 81.0% (n=79), and 85.7% (n=77) were healed by week 1, week 2, and week 4, respectively. Scar assessments conducted on 427 donor sites after one year showed the majority had matched or mildly mismatched color, pigment, and texture. Safety analyses of adverse events (AEs) following ASCS treatment were unlikely or unrelated to the device. Conclusions This study demonstrates successful use of ASCS to achieve closure of donor site wounds in patients with extensive burn injuries.

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S62-S63
Author(s):  
Kevin N Foster ◽  
James H Holmes ◽  
William L Hickerson ◽  
Jeffrey W Shupp ◽  
Robert Sheridan ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Treatment of large TBSA burn injuries is often limited by donor site availability and requires reharvesting to obtain definitive closure. Patients with severe injuries may have delayed closure compared to uncompromised patients that typically have their donor sites healed in 7–14 days. Autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) can be prepared to treat burn wounds at the point-of-care. The safety and effectiveness have not yet been established for use in the treatment of donor sites. This study presents the use of ASCS for the treatment of donor sites in patients with life-threatening burn injuries that were enrolled in a prospective uncontrolled observational study (IDE 15945—NCT02992249). Methods ASCS was applied to the donor site after harvesting of STSGs. Clinical outcomes out to one year were evaluated including percentage of re-epithelialization, long-term cosmetic outcomes, and adverse events. Results Ninety-six subjects from 22 burn centers had their donor sites treated with ASCS as part of their treatment regimen. The average subject age was 30.1 and the average TBSA injury was 53.7 ±17.3%. The mean Baux score was 89.2 with 36% of subjects having a score greater than 100. Collectively, 528 donor sites were individually treated. In this compromised patient population 37.5% were ≥95% re-epithelialized by week 1 (n=435), and by week 2, 82.7% of the donor sites were ≥95% re-epithelialized (n=434), regardless of how many times they were harvested. Approximately 19% of the donor sites treated with ACSC were reharvested multiple times following initial healing (15% two times, 2.3% three times, and 7 donor sites were harvested 4 times) and retreated. Of donor sites harvested more than once, 39.3% (n=84), 81% (n=79), and 85.7% (n=77) of sites were ≥ 95% re-epithelialized by week 1, 2 and 4, respectively. One-year data was available for 427 donor sites and the majority had matched or mildly mismatched color, pigment, and texture. Adverse events included one site with a hematoma, one patient with donor sites that had fragile skin loss secondary to traumatic friction, one patient with active bleeding, two patients with anemia secondary to donor site bleeding, one patient with delayed closure due to mild infection of staph species. All AEs were unlikely or unrelated to the device. Conclusions ASCS has been successfully used to achieve closure of donor site wounds without significant safety risk in patients with extensive burn injuries. Applicability of Research to Practice Application of ASCS for donor site healing may be particularly relevant for patients with large burn injuries requiring subsequent reharvesting to achieve definitive closure.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S100-S101
Author(s):  
Arhana Chattopadhyay ◽  
Courtney Swan ◽  
Clifford C Sheckter ◽  
Deepak Gupta ◽  
Yvonne L Karanas

Abstract Introduction An autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) spray containing keratinocytes, fibroblasts, and melanocytes can be processed from a small split thickness skin sample for use at the point-of-care in the operating room. ASCS have been shown to facilitate epidermal regeneration in large TBSA partial thickness burns with minimal donor site morbidity. We hypothesized that ASCS in conjunction with a 3:1 split thickness skin graft applied to burn wounds and ASCS alone applied to the donor site would facilitate healing in a 95 year-old burn patient with 12% TBSA deep partial and full thickness scald burns to the abdomen and bilateral thighs. To our knowledge, she is the oldest patient to undergo epidermal autografting with ASCS. Methods All burn wounds were tangentially excised in the standard fashion to healthy tissue. Split thickness (12/1000 inch) skin graft was harvested from the right lateral thigh, meshed 3:1, and applied to all wound beds. ASCS were prepared and sprayed on grafted sites and the donor site. All areas were dressed with Telfa clear and Xeroform with bacitracin. Dressings were initially changed every 2 days, and wounds were photographed on day 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 20. Results All burn wounds were deep partial thickness or full thickness. The right thigh donor site was completely healed by POD 10. 90% of the burn wounds had healed by POD 10. The area of deepest burn, an approximately 20 cm2area on the left medial thigh, was healed by POD 20. Conclusions We believe that ASCS enhanced the rate of re-epithelialization of burn wounds in a 95 year-old patient compared to our experience with skin grafting alone in this population. ASCS also promoted complete healing of the donor site by POD 10. This technology may have a role in decreasing healing time in the geriatric burn population. These findings are important for this population as longer lengths of stay are associated with delirium, hospital acquired infections, and deconditioning. This patient’s improved donor site healing also has broader implications as split thickness skin grafts are used widely for wound coverage in plastic surgery. Applicability of Research to Practice Demonstrates efficacy of ASCS in very elderly patients with moderate-sized deep burns and with skin graft donor sites.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S230-S231
Author(s):  
W Hickerson ◽  
J Holmes IV ◽  
J Molnar ◽  
J Carter ◽  
K Foster ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S189-S190
Author(s):  
Alexandra Coward

Abstract Introduction Split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) is the standard of care for the treatment of full thickness skin injuries. Skin grafts are associated with long-term morbidity including graft loss, adjacent structural injury, anesthetic complications, scarring, and scar contractures. Large surface area burns are additionally challenging due to limited donor site availability. Autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) is a new adjunct for STSG using device that provides a suspension of non-cultured, autologous skin cells applied overtop of STSG. Dermal matrix templates are placed on wounds after burn excision and induces dermal regeneration in preparation for STSG, allowing for a thinner graft to be harvested and applied. This technique has been shown to require both smaller areas of donor skin as well as thinner skin harvest which improves both healing time and aesthetic outcomes of donor sites, enhancing the time-tested and well accepted technique of STSG. Methods We present the case of a 5-year-old African American female who suffered 18% TBSA deep partial thickness burns and full thickness burns to her abdomen, trunk and left back after her shirt was accidentally lit on fire at home. She was transferred from a local hospital to our burn center for further evaluation. She was evaluated by both the burn surgery and pediatric teams and admitted for wound cares and surgical planning. Results On hospital day five she underwent burn excision and placement of acellular dermal regeneration template. She returned to the operating room on hospital day 22 after daily wound cares for autografting with autologous skin cell suspension application to anterior and posterior torso and left arm, as well as to back and thigh donor sites. Her takedown on hospital day 29 showed excellent graft take. She was ultimately discharged on hospital day 47. She continued to undergo wound care in the outpatient burn clinic and daily physical and occupational therapy. Conclusions This case illustrates the use of dermal matrix and ASCS on a large burn with excellent aesthetic outcomes and improved healing time. This case is unique in highlighting the versatility of this therapy in a darker skinned patient. There are significant challenges with long term morbidity from STSG and the use of both dermal regenerative matrix and ASCS may provide surgeons with new approaches to decreasing depth and size of donor sites, as well as improving the length of hospital stay and overall aesthetic outcomes of donor and graft sites, specifically in darker skinned patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S123-S123
Author(s):  
Aldin Malkoc ◽  
David Wong

Abstract Introduction Advances in burn injury knowledge, critical care, and pharmacological developments have increased survival rates among extensive burn patients. Survival now dependents not just on skin coverage, but effective control of SIRS response, metabolic derangement, fluid loss and sepsis. Novel synthetic dermal substitutes create robustness, thickness, and pliability of the skin in addition to an improved aesthetic appearance while; point-of-care autologous skin cell harvesting enhances treatment by amplifying small split-thickness skin samples to produce an autologous skin cell suspension (ASCS) to cover a larger burn area. This study reports on two survivors with greater than 90% total body surface area full-thickness burns utilizing a combined treatment of a dermal substitute along with ASCS and traditional burn management strategies. Methods Chart review of two patients with >90% burns and inhalation injury after being trapped in a burning vehicle following a traffic collision occurred. Most of the burns in both patients were “leathery” and consistent with full thickness, sparing only the plantar and dorsal aspect of the feet and bilateral small areas of the hip in Patient 1. Patient 2 had fourth-degree burns in some areas of the chest and flank with only the bilateral groin regions and feet spared. The patients were treated with a multi-step process which included using allograft, dermal substitute, and ASCS with split-thickness skin grafts (STSG) in place of cultured epidermal autograft to achieve coverage of >90% burns with high meshed ratio. Results The dermal substitute was limited to deep burns that penetrated down to fat, muscle, and/or joints. Fluid loss was well controlled by the dermal substitute during initial resuscitation. Post reconstruction, areas covered with the dermal substitute and grafted with autogenous STSG with ASCS exhibited less hypertrophy and contracture bands. The elbow and knee joints showed minimal restriction with passive motion and good skin compliance, but contractures persisted in areas where 4th degree tendon and fascia thermal injury occurred. Areas that showed signs of infection were trimmed or unroofed and allowed to drain while maintaining the remainder of the dermal substitute. Conclusions The use of dermal substitutes and ASCS allowed the care team to achieve SIRS control, improved fluid management, enhanced skin coverage, and reduced hospitalization stay. The process experienced in these cases shows promise for future patients with extensive burns. Both patients were able to survive and show improvement during rehabilitation.


Author(s):  
Vivek Gupta ◽  
Arnab Chanda

Abstract Severe burn injures lead to millions of fatalities every year due to lack of skin replacements. While skin is a very limited and expensive entity, split thickness skin grafting, which involves the projection of a parallel incision pattern on a small section of healthy excised skin, is typically employed to increase the expansion and cover a larger burn site. To date, the real expansion capacity of such grafts are low (<3 times) and insufficient for treatment of severe burn injuries. In this study, novel I-shaped auxetic incision patterns, which are known to exhibit high negative Poisson’s ratios, have been tested on the skin to investigate their expansion potential. Fourteen two-layer skin graft models with varying incision pattern parameters (i.e., length, spacing, and orientation) were developed using finite element modelling and tested under uniaxial and biaxial tensile loads. The Poisson’s ratio, meshing ratios, and induced stresses were quantified across all models. Graft models tested uniaxially along the orthogonal directions indicated opposite trends in generated Poisson’s ratios, as the length of the I-shape incisions were increased. Biaxially, with a symmetric and closely spaced I-shape pattern, graft meshing ratios up to 15.65 were achieved without overstressing the skin. Overall, the findings from the study indicated that expansion potentials much higher than that of traditional skin grafts can be achieved with novel I-shaped auxetic skin grafts, which would be indispensable for covering large wounds in severe burn injuries.


2021 ◽  
pp. 35-38
Author(s):  
Siobhan O’Ceallaigh ◽  
Mamta Shah

Skin grafts are an option for closing skin defects that cannot be closed primarily. A skin graft consists of epidermis and a portion of the underlying dermis that is detached from its blood supply and transferred to another location, usually on the same individual (an autograft). Skin grafts can also be used from cadaver donors (allografts) in extensive burn injuries, but as the recipient’s immune system will eventually reject this foreign tissue, this is only a temporary measure.


2020 ◽  
Vol 231 (4) ◽  
pp. e186-e187
Author(s):  
Laura E. Cooper ◽  
Phillip M. Kemp Bohan ◽  
Tyler R. Everett ◽  
Javier A. Chapa ◽  
Sean E. Christy ◽  
...  

Trials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Poinas ◽  
Pierre Perrot ◽  
Judith Lorant ◽  
Olivier Nerrière ◽  
Jean-Michel Nguyen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Wound repair is one of the most complex biological processes of human life. Allogeneic cell-based engineered skin substitutes provide off-the-shelf temporary wound coverage and act as biologically active dressings, releasing growth factors, cytokines and extracellular matrix components essential for proper wound healing. However, they are susceptible to immune rejection and this is their major weakness. Thanks to their low immunogenicity and high effectiveness in regeneration, fetal skin cells represent an attractive alternative to the commonly used autologous and allogeneic skin grafts. Methods/design We developed a new dressing comprising a collagen matrix seeded with a specific ratio of active fetal fibroblasts and keratinocytes. These produce a variety of healing growth factors and cytokines which will increase the speed of wound healing and induce an immunotolerant state, with a slight inflammatory reaction and a reduction in pain. The objective of this study is to demonstrate that the use of this biological dressing for wound healing at the split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor site, reduces the time to healing, decreases other co-morbidities, such as pain, and improves the appearance of the scar. This investigation will be conducted as part of a randomized study comparing our new biological dressing with a conventional treatment in a single patient, thus avoiding the factors that may influence the healing of a graft donor site. Discussion This clinical trial should enable the development of a new strategy for STSG donor-wound healing based on a regenerative dressing. The pain experienced in the first few days of STSG healing is well known due to the exposure of sensory nerve endings. Reducing this pain will also reduce analgesic drug intake and the duration of sick leave. Our biological dressing will meet the essential need of surgeons to “re-crop” from existing donor sites, e.g., for thermal-burn patients. By accelerating healing, improving the appearance of the scar and reducing pain, we hope to improve the conditions of treatment for skin grafts. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03334656. Registered on 7 November 2017.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document