scholarly journals Cancer Prevention and Control Within the National Cancer Institute's Clinical Trials Network: Lessons From the Community Clinical Oncology Program

1993 ◽  
Vol 85 (22) ◽  
pp. 1807-1811 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D. Kaluzny ◽  
R. B. Warnecke ◽  
L. M. Lacey ◽  
J. P. Morrissey ◽  
D. Gillings ◽  
...  
2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18) ◽  
pp. 2948-2957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia A. Ganz ◽  
Lorna Kwan ◽  
Mark R. Somerfield ◽  
David Alberts ◽  
Judy E. Garber ◽  
...  

Purpose In 2004, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Cancer Prevention Committee surveyed the members to describe involvement in clinical prevention activities. Methods A previously administered survey, with updated items on genetics, chemoprevention, and survivorship, was mailed to a stratified random sample of 2,000 domestic members and a convenience sample of 3,144 international members. Results A total of 49.7% of domestic members contacted and survey eligible responded (n = 851). Nonresponders were younger (50.5 v 51.7 years; P < .01); 465 international members responded. Overall, 35% had received formal instruction in cancer prevention and control, and most respondents expected increased use of prevention, screening/early detection, and risk reduction/genetic counseling in their practices in the next 5 years. Most reported caring for cancer survivors, including providing general medical care. They also either directly provide or refer patients for cancer prevention and control services (eg, cancer screening, tobacco and nutrition counseling, risk reduction, and chemoprevention). Multivariable modeling found fewer perceived barriers to inclusion of cancer prevention activities in clinical practice among those practicing in an academic setting, seeing a higher proportion of patients without a cancer diagnosis, having formal training in prevention and control, expecting an increase in prevention activities in the next 5 years, and providing community advice on prevention. Conclusion Barriers to the inclusion of cancer prevention and control activities in oncology clinical practice exist. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of both domestic and international ASCO members report an interest in cancer prevention and control activities, with a desire for more specific educational programs in this emerging area of oncology practice.


1992 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 164-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
R T Chlebowski ◽  
J Sayre ◽  
M Frank-Stromborg ◽  
L B Lillington

PURPOSE AND METHODS A nationwide needs assessment survey including a validated Cancer Prevention and Early Detection Attitude Inventory of 1,500 randomly selected American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)-member clinical oncologists was conducted via a 67-item, mailed questionnaire to assess practice and attitudes regarding cancer prevention and control. RESULTS Responses of 729 physicians from 48 states representing medical (57%), radiation (17%), surgical (16%), and pediatric oncology (6%), and hematology/other (4%) fields were obtained. Except for ambivalence regarding an important role for diet in cancer causation, cancer prevention and control recommendations were widely endorsed despite skepticism about their impact on reducing deaths from cancer. Surprisingly, a significantly (P less than .001) more favorable attitude for cancer prevention and control issues was found in physicians with greater than 20 years practice compared with younger oncology colleagues, as measured by a 22-item Cancer Prevention and Early Detection Attitude Inventory. Among all physicians, participation in cancer therapy trials exceeded that in cancer prevention and control trials (91% v 27%, P less than .01). Formal instruction during postgraduate training in cancer screening (34%) or prevention (23%) was received by few oncologists; nonetheless, 69% considered themselves a resource for cancer prevention and control issues in their practice communities. Of potential barriers to cancer prevention and control activity, only lack of patients without cancer (53%) and difficulty in including such activity economically into clinical practice (65%) were majority selections. Importantly, 64% agreed they could "motivate their patients to change lifestyle to reduce cancer risk." CONCLUSION Clinical oncologists may represent a potential resource for implementation of cancer prevention and control objectives if economically feasible models for their use in practice settings can be identified.


Cancer ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 180-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan J. Weiner ◽  
Martha M. McKinney ◽  
William R. Carpenter

1994 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 506-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnold D. Kaluzny ◽  
Linda M. Lacey ◽  
Richard Warnecke ◽  
Joseph P. Morrissey ◽  
Edward J. Sondik ◽  
...  

AbstractClinical judgment is increasingly being challenged by the need for randomized clinical trials. The 1987 National Cancer Institute mandate—that the Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP) accrue patients to cancer control protocols—provided an opportunity to examine the factors that affect accrual performance. An analysis of 52 CCOPs and their research bases participating in the program found that the availability of protocols, involvement with research base activities, a demonstrated link to community physicians (particularly those physicians, such as surgeons, who had access to patients), and the use of personal contacts to inform non-CCOP physicians about CCOP activities were important facilitating factors for accruing patients to cancer prevention and control trials.


2005 ◽  
Vol 24 (4, Suppl) ◽  
pp. S106-S110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin D. McCaul ◽  
Ellen Peters ◽  
Wendy Nelson ◽  
Michael Stefanek

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document