Understanding the Spatial Pattern and Driving Factors Associated with Timberland Ownership Change in the Northern United States

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karun Pandit ◽  
Eddie Bevilacqua ◽  
David H Newman ◽  
Brett J Butler

Abstract This study analyzes changes in timberland ownership from 2003 to 2012 across the northern United States based on Forest Inventory and Analysis data identified according to five ownership categories. A total of 26,940 FIA plots that were remeasured between selected years were used for the analysis. Publicly available corporate ownership data were investigated and used to differentiate industrial and institutional (timber investment management organizations [TIMO] and real estate investment trusts [REIT]) ownership. Kernel density, Ripley’s K-function, and multinomial logistic regression (MLR) methods were used to study spatial patterns of timberland ownership and to explore statistical relationships. Among FIA plots showing ownership changes, the largest observed shift was from industrial to institutional ownership, with a 45% increase in the number of plots, equivalent to almost 1.4 million acres of timberland area. Bivariate Ripley’s K-function showed significant clustering for shifts between industrial and institutional ownership. A MLR model identified forest type as a significant factor associated with the transition of industrial timberlands to either institutional or family forest ownership. In addition, shifts from industrial to institutional ownership were related to road access and population density. Study Implications For the past few decades, we have seen an unprecedented trend of change in timberland ownership in the United States, particularly the divesture and change of traditional vertically integrated forest product companies into institutional ownership, i.e., timber investment management organizations (TIMOs) and real estate investment trusts (REITs). In this situation, key research questions to ask are where are these changes taking place in spatial terms and what are their possible linkages with different socio-economic and forest related factors. Such knowledge will help devise policy strategies to monitor and understand the affects of changing timberland ownership on future forest resources.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma M Sass ◽  
Marla Markowski-Lindsay ◽  
Brett J Butler ◽  
Jesse Caputo ◽  
Andrew Hartsell ◽  
...  

Abstract Ownership of forestland in the United States has changed in recent decades, including the proliferation of timber investment management organizations (TIMOs) and real estate investment trusts (REITs), with the potential to alter forest management and timber supply. This article quantifies forest ownership transitions among ownership categories between 2007 and 2017 and investigates how and why large corporate ownerships own and manage their forestlands. Ownership transitions were determined from refined USDA Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis data; we also conducted a survey of large corporate forestland ownerships. Corporate forestland acreage increased between 2007 and 2017, while family and public forestland decreased. Large corporate landowners report multidimensional, financially focused land management, although industry, timber investment management organizations, real estate investment trusts, and other owners report some different motivations and income streams. This work provides a baseline to track future ownership transitions and the behaviors of large corporate forestland owners.


2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (25) ◽  
pp. 46
Author(s):  
Kristal Hykaj

This paper studies the 105 U.S. Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts for the period of 2007-2012, and explores the relationship between corporate governance, institutional ownership, and financial performance. The results are conclusive and show that the presence of women on the board of directors as well as the choice to opt for a classified board enhances the returns on assets and returns on equity. The second finding of this paper is that the percentage of stocks owned by the top 10 institutions, between the levels of 30% and 50%, are associated with higher returns on assets and returns on equity.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
PhD Aurora M. Poó ◽  
Luis Rocha Chíu ◽  
Víctor Lara Poó

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document