Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights

Author(s):  
Correa Carlos Maria

The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) is the most comprehensive and influential international treaty on intellectual property rights. It brings intellectual property rules into the framework of the World Trade Organization, obliging all WTO Member States to meet minimum standards of intellectual property protection and enforcement. This has required massive changes in some national laws, particularly in developing countries. This book provides an in-depth analysis of the principles and of the substantive and enforcement provisions of the TRIPS Agreement. It discusses the legal context in which the Agreement was negotiated, the objectives of their proponents and the nature of the obligations it created for the members of the World Trade Organization. In particular, it examines the minimum standards that must be implemented with regard to patents, trademarks, industrial designs, geographical indications, copyright and related rights, integrated circuits, trade-secrets and test data for pharmaceutical and agrochemical products. The book elaborates on the interpretation of provisions contained in said Agreement, in the light of the customary principles for the interpretation of international law. The analysis—which is supported by a review of the relevant GATT and WTO jurisprudence—identifies the policy space left to such members to implement their obligations in accordance with their own legal systems and public policy objectives, including in respect of complex issues such as patentability criteria, compulsory licenses, exceptions and limitations to copyright, border measures, injunctive relief and the protection of test data under the discipline of unfair competition.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rindy Alfius Phirins

At present, there are seven objects of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) in Indonesia that have been protected by law. One of them is the Integrated Circuit Layout Design (DTLST). In the legal system of IPR, DTLST is relatively new. In fact, even today there are still many Indonesians who do not know exactly what is meant by DTLST. How is the application of Law No. 32 of 2000 concerning Design of Integrated Circuit Layout in Indonesia? What is the object and what is the role of DTLST in the IPR legal system? This is understandable because the law on DTLST was only enacted in 2000 along with three other IPR laws, namely Law No. 29 of 2000 concerning Protection of Plant Varieties; Law No. 30 of 2000 concerning Trade Secrets; Law No. 31 of 2000 concerning Industrial Design; and Law No. 32 of 2000 concerning Integrated Circuit Layout Design.The law above was born as a consequence of the signing of the Uruguay Round Final Act, which was one of the results of the negotiations: the establishment of a world trade institution known as the World Trade Organization (WTO). The approval of the establishment of a WTO institution was then ratified by Indonesia with Law No. 7 of 1994 concerning Ratification of the Establising Agreement of the World Trade Organization (Agreement on the Establishment of a World Trade Organization). Every WTO member must ratify all decisions of this institution including the Trade Related Aspect of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) Agreement, or agreement on aspects of trade in Intellectual Property Rights that refers to the DTLST protection foundation namely the Treaty on Intellectual Property in Respect of Integrated Circuits (Washington Treaty). However, regarding the Layout Design of Integrated Circuits, each member country is given the freedom to regulate itself and adjust to the environmental conditions and technological advances in the country concerned.Keywords: DTLST and IPR.


Author(s):  
Ahan Gadkari ◽  
◽  
Sofia Dash ◽  

The availability of vaccinations against COVID-19 provides hope for containing the epidemic, which has already claimed over 2.84 million lives. However, inoculating millions of individuals worldwide would need large vaccine manufacturing followed by fair distribution. A barrier to vaccine development and dissemination is the developers' intellectual property rights. India and South Africa have jointly sought to the World Trade Organization that certain TRIPS rules of COVID-19 vaccines, medicines, and treatments be waived. This piece argues for such a waiver, highlighting the unique circumstances that exist. It believes that TRIPS's flexibilities are inadequate to cope with the present epidemic, particularly for nations without pharmaceutical manufacturing competence.


2001 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 714-724
Author(s):  
Joe McMahon ◽  
Catherine Seville

This Journal's previous piece on current developments in EC intellectual property noted that this area of law is dominated by the drive towards harmonisation.1 This drive continues, and its success has been such that it can now begin to be seen in an overarching context of globalisation. The idea of a unified global system for the protection of intellectual property now seems at least conceivable, even if not immediately achievable. It is even possible to state that some stages have been achieved on the journey, most notably the TRIPs Agreement. Since adherence to this is a requirement of World Trade Organization (WTO) membership, the arguments in its favour have suddenly become “persuasive”. It represents a tremendous achievement in terms of the protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights throughout the world. The World Intellectual Property Organisation's contribution here and elsewhere has been immense.


Author(s):  
Correa Carlos Maria

This chapter demonstrates how World Trade Organization (WTO) Members are bound to accord the treatment provided for in the Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement to the natural or legal persons that meet the criteria of eligibility for protection provided for under the 1989 Washington Treaty on Intellectual Property in Respect of Integrated Circuits, subject to the exceptions to the national treatment principle provided for therein (Article 3.1 of the TRIPS Agreement). Section 6, Part II, of the TRIPS Agreement essentially obliges Members to comply with the Washington Treaty. This obligation applies irrespective of the fact that the Treaty never entered into force. The protection of integrated circuits is the newest chapter in the intellectual property field. The first country to introduce a sui generis regime with that purpose was the US in 1984, followed by Japan in May 1985. With Section 6 of the TRIPS Agreement, the US and Japan obtained what they were unable to reach with the negotiation of the Washington Treaty. The Agreement gave them an opportunity to correct what they deemed weaknesses of the Washington Treaty, notably, the provisions relating to compulsory licenses, importation of products containing infringing semiconductors, and innocent infringement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document