Part 2 National and Regional Reports, Part 2.5 Latin America: Coordinated by Lauro Gama and José Antonio Moreno Rodríguez, 54 Argentina: Argentine Perspectives on the Hague Principles

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
All Paula María
Keyword(s):  
Latin America ◽  
International Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
Commercial Code ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Hague ◽  
The Law

This chapter discusses Argentine perspectives on the Hague Principles. As regards conventional private international Law, Argentina has ratified the Montevideo Treaties on International Civil Law of 1889 and 1940, which regulate the law applicable to international contracts in Articles 32–39 and 36–42, respectively. Concerning domestic private international Law, its provisions are envisaged in the Argentine Civil and Commercial Code and special statutes. On 7 October 2014, Argentina enacted a new Civil and Commercial Code (CCyCN, for its Spanish acronym), which came into force on 1 August 2015. The regulatory sources consulted for the drafting of the New Code did not include the Hague Principles. Nevertheless, were the CCyCN to be amended in the future, nothing would prevent the Hague Principles from being considered at the time of modifying rules on the law applicable to international contracts. Within the judicial framework, Argentine courts may use the Hague Principles in order to interpret or supplement rules of law on the law applicable to international contracts.

Part 2 National and Regional Reports, Part 2.5 Latin America: Coordinated by Lauro Gama and José Antonio Moreno Rodríguez, 58 Colombia: Colombian Perspectives on the Hague Principles

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salame Antonio Aljure
Keyword(s):  
Latin America ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
Gap Filling ◽  
Commercial Law ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
Commercial Code ◽  
The Hague ◽  
International Instruments

This chapter looks at Colombian perspectives on the Hague Principles. In Colombia, civil and commercial regulations are contained in two separate codes: the Colombian Civil Code and the Commercial Code. Despite their separation, commercial law draws from civil law and regulates several areas not covered by the latter. As a result, civil and commercial law in Colombia should be understood as complementary in that they both regulate international contracts and share similar foundations and principles. There is currently no modern law that comprehensively deals with private international law in Colombia. However, the Bogotá Chamber of Commerce is in the process of drafting legislation with the objective of clarifying the interpretive approach to norms underlying international contracts. Although there is no express reference to the Hague Principles as a guiding or interpretative source of law for judges, it has been recognized in case law that international instruments such as the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts (UPICC) may govern a legal relationship if they do not contravene an express rule. This gap-filling role facilitates the transition of law to modernity by virtue of the requirements of relevance, coherence, and justice.

Part 2 National and Regional Reports, Part 2.5 Latin America: Coordinated by Lauro Gama and José Antonio Moreno Rodríguez, 63 Paraguay: Paraguayan Perspectives on the Hague Principles

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodríguez José Antonio Moreno
Keyword(s):  
Latin America ◽  
Member State ◽  
International Law ◽  
International Institute ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
State Law ◽  
Conflict Of Laws ◽  
Commercial Code ◽  
The World ◽  
The Hague

This chapter highlights Paraguayan perspectives on the Hague Principles. Paraguay does not have a law dealing comprehensively and organically with Private International Law. The Civil and Commercial Code of 1987 contains the basic regulation on conflict of laws, and other provisions on the field can be found scattered in several special laws dealing with specific matters. Paraguay adhered, as a Member State, to the Hague Conference on Private International Law via Law 2555 of 2005. It is the first country in the world to legislate on international contracts heavily influenced by the Hague Principles. The Paraguayan law on international contracts drawn upon the Hague Principles openly allows the application of non-State law, and the International Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT) Principles clearly qualify as such.

Part 2 National and Regional Reports, Part 2.5 Latin America: Coordinated by Lauro Gama and José Antonio Moreno Rodríguez, 65 Uruguay: Uruguayan Perspectives on the Hague Principles

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
de Aguirre Cecilia Fresnedo
Keyword(s):  
Latin America ◽  
International Law ◽  
Buenos Aires ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
Party Autonomy ◽  
Additional Protocol ◽  
The Hague

This chapter reflects on Uruguayan perspectives on the Hague Principles. In Uruguay, international commercial contracts are regulated by the following conventions: the Montevideo Treaty on International Civil Law of 1889; the Montevideo Treaty on International Civil Law of 1940; the Additional Protocol to the Montevideo Treaty on International Civil Law of 1940; and the Buenos Aires Protocol on International Jurisdiction in Contractual Matters. They are also regulated under the domestic private international law rules contained within the Appendix of the Civil Code of Uruguay. The Appendix of the Civil Code, including rules regulating contract, is under revision; a Draft General Act on Private International Law is in Parliament under consideration. It seems unlikely that the Hague Principles will play any role regarding this Draft Act at present; however, the draft has yet to be approved mainly due to disagreement on the role of party autonomy. If the Draft Act is approved and entered into force, the Hague Principles may become useful in Uruguayan law.

Part 2 National and Regional Reports, Part 2.5 Latin America: Coordinated by Lauro Gama and José Antonio Moreno Rodríguez, 66 Venezuela: Venezuelan Perspectives on the Hague Principles

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martínez Claudia Madrid
Keyword(s):  
Latin America ◽  
International Law ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
Party Autonomy ◽  
The Hague ◽  
The Law ◽  
Proximity Principle

This chapter discusses Venezuelan perspectives on the Hague Principles. In Venezuela, the law applicable to international contracts depends on two main sources: the Inter-American Convention on Law Applicable to International Contracts, ratified in 1995 (the Mexico Convention), and the Venezuelan Act on Private International Law. Both the Mexico Convention and the Venezuelan Act adopt solutions that reflect the modern tendencies in the field of contract conflicts. Indeed, these instruments recognize the primacy of party autonomy and the subsidiary application of the proximity principle. The gaps of the Venezuelan Act could be filled, of course, with the solutions of the Mexico Convention. That would be welcome because no possible reform of the Act has been raised as yet. In fact, when scholars comment on the Venezuelan system of Private International Law, they analyse both the Mexico Convention and the Venezuelan Act, because, in short, the three rules of the Act reproduce, with some minor differences, the main rules of the Mexico Convention. Courts could even refer to the Hague Principles as persuasive authority.

Part 2 National and Regional Reports, Part 2.5 Latin America: Coordinated by Lauro Gama and José Antonio Moreno Rodríguez, 59 Costa Rica: Costa Rican Perspectives on the Hague Principles

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chan Anayansy Rojas ◽  
París Mauricio
Keyword(s):  
Costa Rica ◽  
International Law ◽  
Costa Rican ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
International Treaties ◽  
Commercial Arbitration ◽  
The Hague ◽  
The Law ◽  
Local Courts ◽  
Article 5

This chapter assesses Costa Rican perspectives on the Hague Principles. Costa Rica does not have a systematic and codified system that regulates conflicts of law, usually known in Costa Rica as private international law (PIL). Instead, the main sources of PIL in Costa Rica are: (i) international treaties; (ii) the Civil Code, the Code of Civil Procedures, and other domestic laws; and (iii) the Law on International Commercial Arbitration. In general, Costa Rica’s private international law regime, applicable to international commercial contracts, allows for parties to select the law of their choice as long as it does not breach public policy or harm a third party’s interest. According to Article 5 of the Organizational Law of the Judiciary, courts cannot excuse themselves from exercising their authority or from ruling in matters of their competence for lack of a rule to apply and they must do so in accordance with the written and unwritten rules. Unwritten rules refer to the general principles of law, usages and practices, and case law, according to the hierarchical order of their legal sources. Such rules serve to interpret, integrate, and delimit the field of application of law. Therefore, the local courts have limited themselves to only apply domestic law and have consequently restrained themselves from applying the Hague Principles or other soft law instruments as a persuasive authority source.

Part 2 National and Regional Reports, Part 2.3 Australasia: Coordinated by Brooke Marshall, 42 New Zealand: New Zealand Perspectives on the Hague Principles

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hook Maria
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
International Law ◽  
General Position ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
Choice Of Law ◽  
Legislative Reform ◽  
The Hague ◽  
The Law

This chapter examines the choice of law rules that determine the law applicable to international contracts in New Zealand, comparing them to the Hague Principles. Private international law in New Zealand is still largely a common law subject, and the choice of law rules on international commercial contracts are no exception. The general position, which has been inherited from English common law, is that parties may choose the law applicable to their contract, and that the law with the closest and most real connection applies in the absence of choice. There are currently no plans in New Zealand for legislative reform, so the task of interpreting and developing the choice of law rules continues to fall to the courts. When performing this task, New Zealand courts have traditionally turned to English case law for assistance. But they may be willing, in future, to widen their scope of inquiry, given that the English rules have long since been Europeanized. It is conceivable, in this context, that the Hague Principles may be treated as a source of persuasive authority, provided they are consistent with the general principles or policies underlying the New Zealand rules.

Part 2 National and Regional Reports, Part 2.2 Asia: Coordinated by Yuko Nishitani and Béligh Elbalti, 39 United Arab Emirates: Emirati Perspectives on the Hague Principles

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bälz Kilian
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
United Arab Emirates ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Federal State ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
International Treaties ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
The Hague ◽  
The Law

This chapter presents Emirati perspectives on the Hague Principles. The United Arab Emirates (UAE) are a federal State that was established in 1971. Private international law, civil procedure, and arbitration all are federal matters that are covered by federal laws. Private international law is codified in a section of the UAE Civil Code (Federal Law No 5 of 1985) that deals in Articles 10 to 28 with ‘The application of the law regarding the place’. The section also contains the conflict of law rules applicable to international commercial contracts. The statutory provisions of the Civil Code are, in practical terms, the most important source of law when determining the law applicable to an international contract in the UAE. According to Article 22 of the Civil Code, international treaties, to the extent they apply, override the provisions of municipal law. Moreover, Article 23 of the Civil Code provides that in the absence of any statutory provision, ‘the [general] principles of private international law’ shall apply. This provides the UAE courts with the option to make reference to international standards such as the Hague Principles.

Part 2 National and Regional Reports, Part 2.1 Africa: Coordinated by Jan L Neels and Eesa A Fredericks, 16 Morocco: Moroccan Perspectives on the Hague Principles

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaher Khalid
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
International Law ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Private International Law ◽  
Statutory Law ◽  
The Hague ◽  
The Law

This chapter examines Moroccan perspectives on the Hague Principles. In Morocco, the sources of private international law applicable to international commercial contracts are both of a national and an international nature. International sources include mainly treaties and, to a lesser extent, international customs to which the Moroccan courts may refer in particular cases. National sources are statutory law, case law, and scholarly writings. Case law has always played a vital role in the development and the interpretation of the rules applicable to international commercial contracts. It is indeed the role of the courts to determine the scope of law chosen by the parties and to delimit the boundaries of international public policy as a limit to the application of the law chosen by the parties. Moroccan courts consider international customs as important sources in respect of international contracts and arbitration. Having frequently used the universally accepted principles of private international law, Moroccan courts could easily draw on the Hague Principles to find solutions to certain questions that have not been addressed by the legislature.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document