Ethical Issues

2021 ◽  
pp. 176-203
Author(s):  
Dena S. Davis ◽  
Paul T. Menzel
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Advance Directives ◽  
Moral Distress ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Severe Dementia ◽  
Relevant Change ◽  
Decision Making Capacity ◽  
Behavioral Expression ◽  
Pain And Suffering

The implementation of advance directives to withhold food and water by mouth faces significantly more challenges than VSED by persons with decision-making capacity, though with sufficient care and attention, many of these can be resolved. Reduced awareness may leave the person with little understanding of her directive or no awareness at all. In severe dementia, is behavioral expression of a simple desire for food or drink a relevant change of mind about the directive, or by then does the person no longer have the capacity to make such a change? How relevant is the moral distress that caregivers and health care agents will often experience when implementing the person’s directive, or when they are unable to get it implemented? Patients in severe dementia also may be relatively content, with little pain and suffering—is the deterioration itself, without pain and suffering, a legitimate reason for implementing a VSED directive?

Advance Directives, Do Not Resuscitate Orders, and Power of Attorney for Health Care

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Stafman ◽  
Sushanth Reddy
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Advance Directives ◽  
Advance Directive ◽  
Persistent Vegetative State ◽  
Living Will ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Decision Making Capacity ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate Orders

In 2005, Terri Schiavo collapsed at home and was found by her husband without respirations or a pulse. She was resuscitated, but suffered severe anoxic brain injury and after 21/2 months was diagnosed as being in a persistent vegetative state. A court appointed her husband as her legal guardian as she did not have a written advance directive and had not specified a power of attorney for health care (POAHC), but heated court battles raged between her husband and her parents regarding who should be making decisions and what the appropriate decisions were. This case highlights the importance of writing down instructions for end-of-life care or designating someone to make decisions in their best interest in the event they could not make these decisions themselves. This review covers advance directives, do-not-resuscitate orders, and POAHC. Figures show an extended values history form, an example of a living will, the California’s Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment form, components of the CURVES mnemonic to assess decision-making capacity in critical/emergency situations, and activation and deactivation of power of attorney for health care. Tables list the most common types of advance directive and description of each, barriers to the use of advance directives, common themes in surgeons’ attitudes regarding advance directives, general requirements and exclusions for POAHC, and requirements for decision-making capacity in patients. This review contains 5 highly rendered figures, 5 tables, and 56 references

Advance Directives, Do Not Resuscitate Orders, and Power of Attorney for Health Care

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Stafman ◽  
Sushanth Reddy
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Advance Directives ◽  
Advance Directive ◽  
Persistent Vegetative State ◽  
Living Will ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Decision Making Capacity ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate Orders

In 2005, Terri Schiavo collapsed at home and was found by her husband without respirations or a pulse. She was resuscitated, but suffered severe anoxic brain injury and after 21/2 months was diagnosed as being in a persistent vegetative state. A court appointed her husband as her legal guardian as she did not have a written advance directive and had not specified a power of attorney for health care (POAHC), but heated court battles raged between her husband and her parents regarding who should be making decisions and what the appropriate decisions were. This case highlights the importance of writing down instructions for end-of-life care or designating someone to make decisions in their best interest in the event they could not make these decisions themselves. This review covers advance directives, do-not-resuscitate orders, and POAHC. Figures show an extended values history form, an example of a living will, the California’s Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment form, components of the CURVES mnemonic to assess decision-making capacity in critical/emergency situations, and activation and deactivation of power of attorney for health care. Tables list the most common types of advance directive and description of each, barriers to the use of advance directives, common themes in surgeons’ attitudes regarding advance directives, general requirements and exclusions for POAHC, and requirements for decision-making capacity in patients. This review contains 5 highly rendered figures, 5 tables, and 56 references

Advance Directives, Do Not Resuscitate Orders, and Power of Attorney for Health Care

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Stafman ◽  
Sushanth Reddy
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Advance Directives ◽  
Advance Directive ◽  
Persistent Vegetative State ◽  
Living Will ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Decision Making Capacity ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate Orders

In 2005, Terri Schiavo collapsed at home and was found by her husband without respirations or a pulse. She was resuscitated, but suffered severe anoxic brain injury and after 21/2 months was diagnosed as being in a persistent vegetative state. A court appointed her husband as her legal guardian as she did not have a written advance directive and had not specified a power of attorney for health care (POAHC), but heated court battles raged between her husband and her parents regarding who should be making decisions and what the appropriate decisions were. This case highlights the importance of writing down instructions for end-of-life care or designating someone to make decisions in their best interest in the event they could not make these decisions themselves. This review covers advance directives, do-not-resuscitate orders, and POAHC. Figures show an extended values history form, an example of a living will, the California’s Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment form, components of the CURVES mnemonic to assess decision-making capacity in critical/emergency situations, and activation and deactivation of power of attorney for health care. Tables list the most common types of advance directive and description of each, barriers to the use of advance directives, common themes in surgeons’ attitudes regarding advance directives, general requirements and exclusions for POAHC, and requirements for decision-making capacity in patients. This review contains 5 highly rendered figures, 5 tables, and 56 references

Clinical Issues

2021 ◽  
pp. 34-59
Author(s):  
Timothy E. Quill ◽  
Judith K. Schwarz ◽  
V. J. Periyakoil
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Advance Directives ◽  
Oral Care ◽  
Oral Intake ◽  
Informed Choice ◽  
Dry Mouth ◽  
Health Care Proxy ◽  
Decision Making Capacity ◽  
Seriously Ill

VSED requires a decisionally capable, seriously ill patient who makes an informed choice to intentionally hasten death because of unacceptable current suffering or fear of imminent future suffering. In addition to being well informed and determined, patients must have access to ongoing caregiving support and a committed clinician partner. The treating clinician must carefully evaluate the reasons for the patient’s request and her decision-making capacity. Most patients who forgo all oral intake, food and liquids, die peacefully from dehydration within ten to fourteen days. Difficult symptoms of thirst and dry mouth can be adequately relieved with good oral care and access to medications to relieve additional distress. Many patients will be reassured by awareness of the option of VSED even if they never actually exercise it. Completion of advance directives (both health care proxy and instructional) as well as MOLST forms are recommended for anyone initiating VSED, as many patients lose decision-making capacity late in the process.

Clinical Issues

2021 ◽  
pp. 151-175
Author(s):  
Timothy E. Quill ◽  
Judith K. Schwarz
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Advance Directives ◽  
Oral Intake ◽  
Decisional Capacity ◽  
Clinical Issues ◽  
Decision Making Capacity ◽  
Seriously Ill

All seriously ill persons should complete advance directives specifying indications for limiting future provision of food and fluids. AD’s for SED specify When oral intake is to be limited and What limitations are to be imposed. Two categories include: (1) withholding all assisted oral intake from a person who has lost decision-making capacity, and previously indicated her wish to not receive any assisted feeding, and (2) Comfort Feeding Only (CFO) which involves providing as much or as little food and fluid as the patient seems to desire. CFO has three subcategories: (a) “Self-feeding only”—limiting oral intake to what the patient is able to self-administer. (b) Both “self-feeding” and “caregiver assisted-feeding” in whatever amount the patient enjoys. (c) “Minimum Comfort Feeding Only” is a modification for those who had expressed a desire to SED but lost decisional capacity before implementation, but now seem to desire food or fluid.

scholarly journals Temporising and respect for patient self-determination

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-167
Author(s):  
Jenny Lindberg ◽  
Mats Johansson ◽  
Linus Broström
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Care Professional ◽  
Real World ◽  
Clinical Ethics ◽  
Crucial Role ◽  
Self Determination ◽  
Academic Literature ◽  
Decision Making Capacity

The principle of self-determination plays a crucial role in contemporary clinical ethics. Somewhat simplified, it states that it is ultimately the patient who should decide whether or not to accept suggested treatment or care. Although the principle is much discussed in the academic literature, one important aspect has been neglected, namely the fact that real-world decision making is temporally extended, in the sense that it generally takes some time from the point at which the physician (or other health care professional) determines that there is a decision to be made and that the patient is capable of making it, to the point at which the patient is actually asked for his or her view. This article asks under what circumstances, if any, temporising—waiting to pose a certain treatment question to a patient judged to have decision-making capacity—is compatible with the principle of self-determination.

The ethics of interprofessional collaboration

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 426-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce Engel ◽  
Dawn Prentice
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Moral Distress ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Quality Health Care ◽  
Health Care Outcomes ◽  
Quality Health ◽  
Interprofessional Competencies

Interprofessional collaboration has become accepted as an important component in today’s health care and has been guided by concerns with patient safety, quality health-care outcomes, and economics. It is widely accepted that interprofessional collaboration improves patient outcomes through enhanced communication among health-care providers and increased accessibility to services. Although there is a paucity of research that provides confirmatory evidence, interprofessional competencies continue to be incorporated into the curricula of health-care students. This article examines the ethics of interprofessional collaboration and ethical issues that arise from the mainstream adoption of interprofessional competencies and the potential for moral distress in nursing.

Ethics

Oncology ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. 728-738
Author(s):  
Natalia S. Ivascu ◽  
Sheida Tabaie ◽  
Ellen C. Meltzer
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Informed Consent ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Surrogate Decision Making ◽  
Ethical Problems ◽  
Decision Making Capacity ◽  
Surgical Critical Care ◽  
Surrogate Decision ◽  
Special Circumstances

In all areas of medicine physicians are confronted with a myriad ethical problems. It is important that intensivists are well versed on ethical issues that commonly arise in the critical care setting. This chapter will serve to provide a review of common topics, including informed consent, decision-making capacity, and surrogate decision-making. It will also highlight special circumstances related to cardiac surgical critical care, including ethical concerns associated with emerging technologies in cardiac care.

Psychiatry of the elderly

2021 ◽  
pp. 499-528
Author(s):  
Catherine Oppenheimer ◽  
Julian C. Hughes
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Old Age ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Predictive Diagnosis ◽  
Truth Telling ◽  
Persons With Disabilities ◽  
Decision Making Capacity ◽  
The Face ◽  
Mental Capacity Act

This chapter describes the ethical issues that arise in the setting of mental illness, and particularly dementia, in old age. It affirms the importance of understanding each older person as an individual, embedded in a unique history and in relationships which sustain their identity even in the face of cognitive decline. Autonomy and paternalism are discussed, and the alternative concept of ‘parentalism’ introduced. Decision-making capacity and competence are extensively analysed from both philosophical and practical viewpoints, with particular reference to the Mental Capacity Act 2005, and to mechanisms for decision-making for noncompetent patients. Topics briefly treated include predictive diagnosis and mild cognitive impairment, end-of-life care, truth telling, sexuality, and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The text is aimed at old age psychiatrists and other practitioners in the field, as well as at those with an interest in ethical issues in old age.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document