History of the Advanced Practice Role in Palliative Nursing

Author(s):  
Constance Dahlin ◽  
Patrick J. Coyne
Keyword(s):  
2002 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 51-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Johnson

The neonatal nurse practitioner (NNP) emerged in the 1970s. During the first two decades, nurses who functioned in this new advanced-practice role were forced to overcome interprofessional isolation, variable educational preparation, underutilization, and title ambiguity. However, after nearly 30 years of evolution influenced by the changing health care environment, technological advancements in newborn care, medical personnel shortages, and the advanced-practice nurse movement, the NNP is now a recognized member of the neonatal health care team nationwide. The NNP has achieved the level of provider status, but only after successfully overcoming many practice restrictions and restraints over the decades. This article chronicles the history of the NNP and recounts the external and internal elements that contributed to the development of this profession.


2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-65
Author(s):  
Carol Hartigan

This article describes the development of a new regulatory model for advanced practice nursing. The history of nursing licensure is detailed to provide a perspective of the differences in the way that advanced practice roles evolved as a result of external forces and patient needs without the direct control of regulators and the resulting variations in the interpretation and implementation of the roles nationwide. Key provisions of the new consensus model for regulation are detailed, along with implications for each of the main stakeholder groups: licensure, accreditation, certification, and education.


Author(s):  
Nancy Rudner Lugo

In the United States, Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) regulations are determined at the state level, through legislation and rule making. The lack of an evidence base to APRN regulation has resulted in a patchwork of varied regulations and requirements for nurse practitioners. The author begins this article by reviewing the history of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) in the United States and describing her study that assessed APRN fullpractice authority in states that ratified the ERA versus states that opposed it. She presents the study findings, limitations of the comparison, and discussion of the findings and implications. In conclusion, the findings demonstrated that progress toward full APRN practice will require building strategies for political support and framing the need to update APRN regulations in a manner that aligns with each state’s social and political values.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document