Classification of Neuropathic Pain

2018 ◽  
pp. 11-16
Author(s):  
Abdullah Kandil ◽  
Danielle Perret

Neuropathic pain encompasses a category of chronic pain conditions that are caused by disease or lesion of the somatosensory nervous system. Depending on the location of the lesion or disease, neuropathic pain can be categorized as peripheral, central, or mixed. Peripheral neuropathic pain includes such common pain conditions as painful diabetic neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, radiculopathies, post-amputation stump pain, various nerve entrapment syndromes, and neuropathies due to immune, hereditary, metabolic, and toxic factors. Central neuropathic pain is pain caused by stroke, spinal cord injury, spinal infarction, syringomyelia, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson disease, and phantom limb pain. In contrast, some conditions may cause pain through both central and peripheral mechanisms, such spinal stenosis, complex regional pain syndrome type II, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, fibromyalgia, and cancer pain. Classification of neuropathic may not only help guide the diagnosis and treatment of these chronic pain conditions but may also provide the framework for research of the mechanisms of generation of neuropathic pain.

Author(s):  
Sachin Rastogi ◽  
Fiona Campbell

Neuropathic pain is defined as ‘pain arising as a direct consequence of a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory system’. It is often contrasted with nociceptive pain which is associated with tissue injury or inflammation. Neuropathic pain exhibits certain clinical features that differentiate it from nociceptive pain. Neuropathic pain conditions in children are different from those in adults and include complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), phantom limb pain, postoperative and post-traumatic neuropathic pain, and autoimmune and degenerative neuropathies, e.g. Guillain–Barré syndrome, Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease. However, a lack of randomized controlled trials in children means that evidence from adult studies guides pharmacological management of neuropathic pain in children, which is problematic as the aetiologies and mechanisms are different. In this chapter we propose an algorithm for drug therapy for neuropathic pain in children based on best available evidence, our clinical experience, and the safety of these drugs in paediatric practice. We suggest a step-wise approach incorporating first-, second-, third-, and fourth-line therapies that should be tried methodically according to effectiveness and side effects. Neuropathic pain in children, if identified and treated in a timely manner as part of an interdisciplinary framework, using multimodal strategies can be managed effectively.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subbulakshmi Sundaram ◽  
Ashok Swaminathan Govindarajan

Chronic pain is one of the leading causes of years lost to disability, as most of the time it is refractory to conventional treatment. Recent advances in understanding the pain mechanisms have favored the use of ketamine as a rescue agent in refractory chronic pain conditions, as it has potential modulating effect on both sensory-discriminative and affective motivational components of pain. Preclinical studies also suggested the antinociceptive effect of sub anesthetic dose of ketamine against central and peripheral neuropathic pain conditions and non-neuropathic pain conditions such as inflammatory and nociceptive pain states. Subanesthetic infusion of ketamine along with adjuvants such as midazolam and clonidine is found to reduce the psychomimetic and cardiovascular side effects of ketamine. Even though the consensus guidelines for intravenous use of ketamine for chronic pain advocate the use of ketamine only for complex regional pain syndrome, various other clinical studies suggested its role in other refractory painful conditions. Hence the present topic focuses specifically on the effect of ketamine on non-neuropathic pain conditions such as complex regional pain syndrome, fibromyalgia, headache, ischemic limb pain, etc. Many studies had shown that ketamine not only reduces the pain scores but also the analgesic medications, which further improves the well-being and quality of life.


2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. 486-494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel P Castellanos ◽  
Chris Woolley ◽  
Kelly Amanda Bruno ◽  
Fadel Zeidan ◽  
Adam Halberstadt ◽  
...  

The development of chronic pain is a complex mechanism that is still not fully understood. Multiple somatic and visceral afferent pain signals, when experienced over time, cause a strengthening of certain neural circuitry through peripheral and central sensitization, resulting in the physical and emotional perceptual chronic pain experience. The mind-altering qualities of psychedelics have been attributed, through serotonin 2A (5-HT2A) receptor agonism, to ‘reset’ areas of functional connectivity (FC) in the brain that play prominent roles in many central neuropathic states. Psychedelic substances have a generally favorable safety profile, especially when compared with opioid analgesics. Clinical evidence to date for their use for chronic pain is limited; however, several studies and reports over the past 50 years have shown potential analgesic benefit in cancer pain, phantom limb pain and cluster headache. While the mechanisms by which the classic psychedelics may provide analgesia are not clear, several possibilities exist given the similarity between 5-HT2A activation pathways of psychedelics and the nociceptive modulation pathways in humans. Additionally, the alterations in FC seen with psychedelic use suggest a way that these agents could help reverse the changes in neural connections seen in chronic pain states. Given the current state of the opioid epidemic and limited efficacy of non-opioid analgesics, it is time to consider further research on psychedelics as analgesics in order to improve the lives of patients with chronic pain conditions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Breanna L. Sheldon ◽  
Jonathan Bao ◽  
Olga Khazen ◽  
Julie G. Pilitsis

Neuropathic pain is a rampant disease exacting a significant toll on patients, providers, and health care systems around the globe. Neuromodulation has been successfully employed to treat many indications including failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), phantom limb pain (PLP), radiculopathies, and intractable pelvic pain, among many others. Recent studies have also demonstrated efficacy for cancer-related pain and chemotherapy induced neuropathy with these techniques. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is the most commonly employed technique and involves implantation of percutaneous or paddle leads targeting the dorsal columns of the spinal cord with the goal of disrupting the pain signals traveling to the brain. Tonic, high frequency, and burst waveforms have all been shown to reduce pain and disability in chronic pain patients. Closed-loop SCS systems that automatically adjust stimulation parameters based on feedback (such as evoked compound action potentials) are becoming increasingly used to help ease the burden placed on patients to adjust their programming to their pain and position. Additionally, dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) is a newer technique that allows for dermatomal coverage especially in patients with pain in up to two dermatomes. Regardless of the technique chosen, neuromodulation has been shown to be cost-effective and efficacious and should be given full consideration in patients with chronic pain conditions.


2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-64
Author(s):  
Pavel G. Genov ◽  
O. V Smirnova ◽  
V. H Timerbaev

About 50-85% of patients suffer from stump and phantom pain after amputations. These chronic pain conditions are often debilitating and result in disability, sleep and psychosocial disorders, impairment of day-work and the substantial decline in the quality of life. In some patients pharmaceutical therapy may fail to bring satisfactory pain relief or follows severe adverse events. Operations such as rhizotomy, cordotomy and stump revision are often unsuccessful in treating post-amputation chronic pain. The solitary case reports about the using of minimally invasive technique of pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) for treatment of chronic stump and phantom pain have been published only. Our current clinical observation is about successful using of the PRF spinal ganglions in patient with chronic pharmaceutical-resistant post-amputation stump pain.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Aguirre ◽  
Alicia Del Moral ◽  
Irina Cobo ◽  
Alain Borgeat ◽  
Stephan Blumenthal

A continuous peripheral nerve block (cPNB) is provided in the hospital and ambulatory setting. The most common use of CPNBs is in the peri- and postoperative period but different indications have been described like the treatment of chronic pain such as cancer-induced pain, complex regional pain syndrome or phantom limb pain. The documented benefits strongly depend on the analgesia quality and include decreasing baseline/dynamic pain, reducing additional analgesic requirements, decrease of postoperative joint inflammation and inflammatory markers, sleep disturbances and opioid-related side effects, increase of patient satisfaction and ambulation/functioning improvement, an accelerated resumption of passive joint range-of-motion, reducing time until discharge readiness, decrease in blood loss/blood transfusions, potential reduction of the incidence of postsurgical chronic pain and reduction of costs. Evidence deriving from randomized controlled trials suggests that in some situations there are also prolonged benefits of regional anesthesia after catheter removal in addition to the immediate postoperative effects. Unfortunately, there are only few data demonstrating benefits after catheter removal and the evidence of medium- or long-term improvements in health-related quality of life measures is still lacking. This review will give an overview of the advantages and adverse effects of cPNBs.


Pain Medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nick Christelis ◽  
Brian Simpson ◽  
Marc Russo ◽  
Michael Stanton-Hicks ◽  
Giancarlo Barolat ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective For many medical professionals dealing with patients with persistent pain following spine surgery, the term failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) as a diagnostic label is inadequate, misleading and potentially troublesome. It misrepresents causation. Alternative terms have been suggested but none has replaced FBSS. The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) published a revised classification of chronic pain, as part of the new International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11), which has been accepted by the World Health Organization (WHO). This includes the term Chronic pain after spinal surgery (CPSS), which is suggested as a replacement for FBSS. Methods This article provides arguments and rationale for a replacement definition. In order to propose a broadly applicable yet more precise and clinically informative term, an international group of experts was established. Results 14 candidate replacement terms were considered and ranked. The application of agreed criteria reduced this to a shortlist of four. A preferred option – Persistent spinal pain syndrome – was selected by a structured workshop and Delphi process. We provide rationale for using Persistent spinal pain syndrome and a schema for its incorporation into ICD-11. We propose the adoption of this term would strengthen the new ICD-11 classification. Conclusions This project is important to those in the fields of pain management, spine surgery and neuromodulation, as well as patients labelled with FBSS. Through a shift in perspective it could facilitate the application of the new ICD-11 classification and allow clearer discussion amongst medical professionals, industry, funding organisations, academia, and the legal profession.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy K. Esaki

Ketamine is an N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist that has been increasingly used in the management of treatment-resistant chronic pain conditions, particularly representing neuropathic involvement or central sensitization. Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a prototypical condition often treated with ketamine infusions. Although the analgesic benefits of ketamine as an opioid-sparing adjunct in the preoperative period have been well studied, the use of ketamine to mitigate chronic pain conditions remains largely anecdotal, composed largely of case reports and uncontrolled small studies. The limited evidence and published reports support the use of ketamine infusions as one aspect of a comprehensive, multimodal approach for CRPS. Although ketamine infusions are relatively safe when titrated appropriately, with minimal respiratory depression, side effects include sympathetic activation, unpleasant psychomimetic effects, lower urinary tract symptoms, and hepatic dysfunction. 


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 603-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ha Sam Ol ◽  
Yang Van Heng ◽  
Lena Danielsson ◽  
Hans Husum

Abstract Background and aims The aim of the study was to examine the effect of mirror and tactile therapy on phantom and stump pain in patients with traumatic amputations, with particular reference to amputees in low-income communities. Methods The study was conducted with an open, randomized, semi-crossover case-control design in rural Cambodia. A study sample of 45 landmine victims with trans-tibial amputations was allocated to three treatment arms; mirror therapy, tactile therapy, and combined mirror-and-tactile therapy. Non-responders from the mono-therapy interventions were crossed over to the alternative intervention. The intervention consisted of 5 min of treatment every morning and evening for 4 weeks. Endpoint estimates of phantom limb pain (PLP), stump pain, and physical function were registered 3 months after the treatment. Results All three interventions were associated with more that 50% reduction in visual analogue scale (VAS)-rated PLP and stump pain. Combined mirror-tactile treatment had a significantly better effect on PLP and stump pain than mirror or tactile therapy alone. The difference between the three treatment arms were however slight, and hardly of clinical relevance. After treatment, the reduction of pain remained unchanged for an observation period of 3 months. Conclusions The study documents that a 4-week treatment period with mirror and/or tactile therapy significantly reduces PLP and stump pain after trans-tibial amputations. Implications The article reports for the first time a randomized controlled trial of mirror therapy in a homogenous sample of persons with traumatic amputations. The findings are of special relevance to amputees in low-resource communities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document