Use of Buprenorphine for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder

2020 ◽  
pp. 155-168
Author(s):  
Paul J. Fudala ◽  
Anne Cramer Andorn
Keyword(s):  
Opioid Dependence ◽  
Addiction Treatment ◽  
Partial Agonist ◽  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Sublingual Administration ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
The Us ◽  
Monthly Administration ◽  
Drug Addiction Treatment

Buprenorphine is a mu-opioid partial agonist that was first developed as a parenteral analgesic and subsequently as a treatment for opioid dependence. In the United States, the first two products approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (in 2002) for the latter indication were buprenorphine (Subutex) and buprenorphine/naloxone (Suboxone) tablet formulations for sublingual administration. Since that time, additional products for both sublingual and buccal administration have also been approved, as well as a subcutaneous injection for once-monthly administration for the treatment of moderate or severe opioid use disorder (OUD) and a subdermal implant for the maintenance treatment of opioid dependence that delivers buprenorphine over a 6-month period. Under the Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 (DATA 2000), qualified practitioners may apply for waivers to treat opioid dependence/OUD with approved buprenorphine products in any setting in which they are qualified to practice. Like other opioids, buprenorphine has the potential for being misused and abused.

scholarly journals Methadone Distribution Trends from 2017-2019 in the United States

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A. Furst ◽  
Nicholas J. Mynarski ◽  
Kenneth L. McCall ◽  
Brian J. Piper
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
Distribution Patterns ◽  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Treatment Programs ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Drug Enforcement ◽  
The Us

AbstractObjectiveMethadone is an evidence based treatment for opioid use disorder and is also employed for acute pain. The primary objective of this study was to explore methadone distribution patterns between the years 2017 and 2019 across the United States (US). This study builds upon previous literature that has analyzed prior years of US distribution patterns, and further outlines regional and state specific methadone trends.MethodsThe Drug Enforcement Administration’s Automated Reports and Consolidated Ordering System (ARCOS) was used to acquire the number of narcotic treatment programs (NTPs) per state and methadone distribution weight in grams. Methadone distribution by weight, corrected for state populations, and number of NTPs were compared from 2017 to 2019 between states, within regions, and nationally.ResultsBetween 2017 and 2019, the national distribution of methadone increased 12.30% for NTPs but decreased 34.57% for pain, for a total increase of 2.66%. While all states saw a decrease in distribution for pain, when compared regionally, the Northeast showed a significantly smaller decrease than all other regions. Additionally, the majority of states experienced an increase in distribution for NTPs and most states demonstrated a relatively stable or increasing number of NTPs, with an 11.49% increase in NTPs nationally. The number of NTPs per 100K in 2019 ranged from 2.08 in Rhode Island to 0.00 in Wyoming.ConclusionAlthough methadone distribution for OUD was increasing in the US, there were pronounced regional disparities.

scholarly journals An Examination of the Complex Pharmacological Properties of the Non-Selective Opioid Receptor Modulator Buprenorphine

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leana Pande ◽  
Brian Piper
Keyword(s):  
Partial Agonist ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Receptor Occupancy ◽  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Biologically Active ◽  
Poison Control ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Analgesic Effects ◽  
Receptor Modulator

Buprenorphine, an analogue of thebaine, is a Schedule III opioid in the United States used for opioid-use disorder and as an analgesic. Research has shown drugs like buprenorphine have a complicated pharmacology with characteristics that challenge traditional definitions of terms like agonist, antagonist, and efficacy. Buprenorphine has a high affinity for the mu (MOR), delta (DOR), kappa (KOR), and intermediate for the nociceptin opioid receptors (NOR). Buprenorphine is generally described as a partial MOR agonist with limited activity and decreased response at the mu-receptor relative to full agonists. In opioid naïve patients, the drug’s analgesic efficacy is equivalent to a full MOR agonist, despite decreased receptor occupancy and the “ceiling effect” produced from larger doses. Some argue buprenorphine’s effects depend on the endpoint measured, as it functions as a partial agonist for respiratory depression, but a full-agonist for pain. Buprenorphine’s active metabolite, norbuprenorphine, attenuates buprenorphine's analgesic effects due to NOR binding and respiratory depressant effects. The method of administration impacts efficacy and tolerance when administered for analgesia. There have been eleven-thousand reports involving buprenorphine and minors (age < 19) to US poison control centers, the preponderance (89.2%) with children. The consequences of prenatal buprenorphine exposure in experimental animals and humans should continue to be carefully evaluated. In conclusion, buprenorphine’s characterization as only a partial mu-agonist is an oversimplification. Contemporary research shows the traditional explanation of the pharmacology of buprenorphine does not take into account changes to receptor theory, pharmacological terminology, route of administration, and biologically active major metabolites.

Epidemiology of Substance Use Disorders

2020 ◽  
pp. 3-28
Author(s):  
L. Morgan Snell ◽  
Andrew J. Barnes ◽  
Peter Cunningham
Keyword(s):  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Overdose ◽  
Prescription Opioids ◽  
Opioid Epidemic ◽  
Provider Education ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
The Us ◽  
Overdose Deaths

Nearly 3 million Americans have a current or previous opioid use disorder, and recent data indicate that 10.2% of US adults have ever misused pain relievers. In 2015, approximately 800,000 individuals used heroin, while 4 million misused prescription opioids. Although use of other drugs such as alcohol and cannabis is more prevalent, opioid use contributes to significant morbidity, mortality, and social and economic costs. While the current US opioid overdose epidemic began with prescription opioids, since 2015, heroin and synthetic opioids (e.g., fentanyl) have driven continued increases in opioid overdose deaths, contributing to a recent decline in overall life expectancy in the United States. Policies to address the opioid epidemic by changing clinical practice include provider education, monitoring prescribing practices, and expanding the clinical workforce necessary to treat opioid use disorders. The opioid epidemic appears to be largely a US phenomenon and a consequence of both structural challenges in the US healthcare system and growing socioeconomic disparities, and thus it will require policies including and beyond delivery system reforms to resolve it.

scholarly journals Adolescent-Serving Addiction Treatment Facilities in the United States and the Availability of Medications for Opioid Use Disorder

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 542-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel H. Alinsky ◽  
Scott E. Hadland ◽  
Pamela A. Matson ◽  
Magdalena Cerda ◽  
Brendan Saloner
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Addiction Treatment ◽  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Treatment Facilities

scholarly journals Systematic content analysis of patient evaluations of START NOW psychotherapy reveals practical strategies for improving the treatment of opioid use disorder

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert Yi-Que Truong ◽  
Brian Fabian Saway ◽  
Malek H. Bouzaher ◽  
Mustafa Nawroz Rasheed ◽  
Sanaz Monjazeb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Focus Groups ◽  
Addiction Treatment ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Implementation Strategies ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Assessment Protocol ◽  
Medication Assisted Treatment ◽  
Favorable Outlook ◽  
Drug Addiction Treatment

Abstract Background Clinical trials provide consistent evidence for buprenorphine’s efficacy in treating opioid use disorder (OUD). While the Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 requires physicians to combine medication-assisted treatment (MAT) with behavioral intervention, there is no clear evidence for what form or elements of psychotherapy are most effective when coupled with MAT to treat OUD. This investigation involves focus groups designed to collect patient opinions about a specific psychotherapy, called START NOW, as well as general beliefs about various elements of psychotherapy for treating OUD. Our analysis reveals trends about patient preferences and strategies for improving OUD treatment. Methods Subjects included patients enrolled in buprenorphine/naloxone MAT at our institution’s office-based opioid treatment program. All subjects participated in a single START NOW group session, which was led by a provider (physician or nurse practitioner trained and standardized in delivering START NOW). Consented subjects participated in satisfaction surveys and audio-recorded focus groups assessing individual beliefs about various elements of psychotherapy for treating OUD. Results Overall, 38 different focus groups, 92 participation events, and 44 unique subjects participated in 1-to-6 different START NOW session/audio-recorded focus group sessions led by a certified moderator. Demographic data from 36/44 subjects was collected. Seventy-five percent (33/44) completed the START NOW Assessment Protocol, which revealed self-reported behavioral trends. Analysis of all 92 START NOW Satisfaction Questionnaire results suggests that subjects’ opinions about START NOW improved with increased participation. Our analysis of audio-recorded focus groups is divided into three subsections: content strategies for new psychotherapies, implementation strategies, and other observations. For example, participants request psychotherapies to target impulsivity and to teach future planning and build positive relationships. Conclusions The results of this study may guide implementation of psychotherapy and improve the treatment of OUD, especially as it relates to improving the modified START NOW program for treating OUD. Our study also reveals a favorable outlook of START NOW with increased participation, suggesting that any initial reticence to this program can be overcome to allow for effective implementation.

scholarly journals Rise and Regional Disparities in Buprenorphine Utilization in the United States

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Azar R. Pashmineh ◽  
Alexandra Cruz-Mullane ◽  
Jaclyn C. Podd ◽  
Warren S. Lam ◽  
Suhail H. Kaleem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Partial Agonist ◽  
Strong Association ◽  
The United States ◽  
Regional Disparities ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Policy Changes ◽  
Drug Enforcement ◽  
Drug Enforcement Administration ◽  
The Us

AbstractAimsBuprenorphine is an opioid partial-agonist used to treat Opioid Use Disorders (OUD). While several state and federal policy changes have attempted to increase buprenorphine availability, access remains well below optimal levels. This study characterized how buprenorphine utilization in the United States has changed over time and whether there are regional disparities in distribution.MeasurementsBuprenorphine weights distributed from 2007 to 2017 were obtained from the Drug Enforcement Administration. Data was expressed as the percent change and as the mg per person in each state. Separately, the formulations for prescriptions covered by Medicaid (2008 to 2018) were examined.FindingsBuprenorphine distributed to pharmacies increased about seven-fold (476.8 to 3,179.9 kg) while the quantities distributed to hospitals grew five-fold (18.6 to 97.6 kg) nationally from 2007 to 2017. Buprenorphine distribution per person was almost 20-fold higher in Vermont (40.4 mg/person) relative to South Dakota (2.1 mg/person). There was a strong association between the number of waivered physicians per 100K population and distribution per state (r(49) = +0.76, p < .0005). The buprenorphine/naloxone sublingual film (Suboxone) was the predominant formulation (92.6% of 0.31 million Medicaid prescriptions) in 2008 but this accounted for less than three-fifths (57.3% of 6.56 million prescriptions) in 2018.ConclusionsAlthough buprenorphine availability has substantially increased over the last decade, distribution was very non-homogenous across the US.

scholarly journals Admission Practices And Cost Of Care For Opioid Use Disorder At Residential Addiction Treatment Programs In The US

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 317-325
Author(s):  
Tamara Beetham ◽  
Brendan Saloner ◽  
Marema Gaye ◽  
Sarah E. Wakeman ◽  
Richard G. Frank ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Addiction Treatment ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Treatment Programs ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
The Us

What's in a number? Recommending practicality in the DATA 2000 patient limits

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 243
Author(s):  
Andrea G. Barthwell, MD, DFASAM ◽  
Jonathan M. Young, JD, PhD ◽  
Michael C. Barnes, JD ◽  
Shruti R. Kulkarni, JD
Keyword(s):  
Addiction Treatment ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Addiction Medicine ◽  
Access To Treatment ◽  
The Us ◽  
Final Rule ◽  
Receive Treatment

According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2.4 million individuals have an opioid use disorder (OUD). Yet, nearly 80 percent of them—more than 1.9 million people—do not receive treatment. Medication-assisted treatment (MAT), specifically with buprenorphine, has proven to be effective in treating patients with OUDs while also reducing costs to the healthcare system, criminal justice system, and workforce. Despite its effectiveness, barriers to MAT continue to exist. Consequently, many individuals must wait months, if not years, to receive treatment. This article analyzes the US Department of Health and Human Services’ final rule (Final Rule) on MAT, common barriers to treatment, and the cost-benefit of treatment in light of the current opioid abuse epidemic. The article finds that while the Final Rule was a step in the right direction, it does not go far enough to adequately address the epidemic. Finally, the article proposes practical recommendations for increasing patient access to treatment for OUDs, including increasing the patient limit for highly qualified addiction treatment providers so that they can practice addiction medicine on a full-time basis and exempting buprenorphine products labeled by the US Food and Drug Administration for direct administration from the practitioner's patient limit.

Adverse effects of regulation on buprenorphine prescribing and its impact on the treatment of opioid use disorder

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 133-139
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Strickland, MD, FACOG ◽  
John Sorboro, MD, DABPN, FASAM
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
The Us ◽  
Main Driver ◽  
The Face ◽  
State Oversight ◽  
Overdose Deaths

Problem: Drug addiction and misuse is a medical and societal problem that has exacted a heavy toll on the United States, and, indeed, the world. In the United States, opioids are currently the main driver of drug overdose deaths. Despite the proven safety and efficacy of medically assisted therapy (MAT) using buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD), as well as the fact that its use is regulated by US Federal Law, many states have enacted separate and often burdensome regulations that restrict the prescribing of buprenorphine beyond those required by the US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) under the provisions of the DATA 2000 Act, and unnecessarily reduce the availability of effective treatment of OUD in those states.Purpose: The purpose of this article is to review the pharmacology of both buprenorphine (and naloxone as an additive) and the risks associated with the misuse of buprenorphine products and to consider if such additional state oversight and restrictions improves or is deleterious to public safety in the face of this national epidemic.Conclusion: We conclude that the placing of unnecessary and unscientific restraints on the treatment of patients with OUD is inconsistent with the principles of harm reduction, and such restraints should be removed unless/until they can be supported by real evidence. 

scholarly journals Cross-state variation in opioid use disorder among a privately insured nonelderly population in the United States

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bibo Jiang ◽  
Li Wang ◽  
Douglas Leslie
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Epidemic ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs ◽  
The Us ◽  
State Variation ◽  
Demographic Patterns ◽  
Privately Insured

Abstract Background: Although cross-state variation of the opioid epidemic in the United States are well documented in general, little are known about the epidemic in privately insured individuals. Objectives: To describe cross-state variation in Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) among privately insured individuals in the US for the years 2005-2015 and investigate demographic differences of OUD patients between a group of hard-hit states and the rest states. Methods: The MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database was used to calculate prevalence of opioid use disorder for the 50 states in the US, respectively. We analyzed level and change of OUD prevalence in each state from 2005 to 2015 and identified the states which were affected most by the epidemic. One-sided exact fisher test was used to analyze demographic difference of the epidemic in the hard-hit states and the remaining states. Results: Cross-state variations of the opioid epidemic among privately insured population were substantial, both in terms of severity and acceleration of the epidemic. Demographic patterns of the epidemic were similar across states. The 18-34 age group was the most affected group with the highest prevalence. The 55-64 group experienced the most rapid increase of OUD prevalence, especially in states that suffered most in the epidemic. Conclusions: Results can assist policy makers to design better clinical and policy interventions on the opioid epidemic, especially on privately insured individuals. Drastic increase of OUD prevalence among the 55-64 group might indicate the need to improve prescription drug monitoring programs for chronic pain, especially in states more affected by the epidemic.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document