Headache associated with head trauma

2020 ◽  
pp. 314-321
Author(s):  
Sylvia Lucas
Keyword(s):  
Primary Headache ◽  
Headache Disorder ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Temporal Association ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Secondary Headache ◽  
Primary Headache Disorder ◽  
Global Health Issue ◽  
History Of ◽  
Probable Migraine

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an extremely important, common global health issue with approximately 2.5 million TBIs occurring yearly in the civilian population alone. The symptom manifestations of TBI are called ‘concussion’ symptoms and headache is the most common. Post-traumatic headache (PTH) is a secondary headache occurring in temporal association with the TBI and thought to be caused by the injury. Many studies have found PTH to be frequent and persistent, with a higher prevalence of PTH after mild than moderate to severe TBI. In both severity injuries, the most frequent phenotype of PTH is migraine or probable migraine. PTH risk factor after injury is a prior history of primary headache disorder. The relationship between TBI and PTH is unknown and currently the subject of intense research. As yet, treatment of PTH is empiric with standard of care to ‘phenotype’ the headache according to primary headache clinical characteristics and use the type as a guideline for management.

Case series of sixteen patients with nummular headache

Cephalalgia ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 1527-1530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin Moon ◽  
Kamran Ahmed ◽  
Ivan Garza
Keyword(s):  
Medication Overuse ◽  
Age Of Onset ◽  
Medication Overuse Headache ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Primary Headache ◽  
Headache Disorder ◽  
Therapeutic Interventions ◽  
Nummular Headache ◽  
Primary Headache Disorder ◽  
History Of

Introduction: Nummular headache is a rare primary headache disorder described by a focal circumscribed area of pain (2–6 cm in diameter). Literature on this disorder is sparse. Patients and methods: Here, we describe a case series of 16 patients (6 men, 10 women) seen at the Mayo Clinic. Results: Mean age of onset was 50 years (range, 19–79 years) and mean duration of headache was 7.9 years (range, 0.33–40 years). Location of headache varied and was found to be an average of 3.9 cm in diameter (range, 2–10 cm). Headache was episodic (<15 days/month) in four patients and chronic (>15 days/month) in 12 patients. Attention was paid to therapeutic interventions. Resolution was seen in 38% of patients. Migraine was present in the history of 56% of patients and medication overuse headache was found in 25%. Conclusions: Our series results support previous findings. In our population, no specific therapy was identified to be effective in more than one patient.

Headache in Sports

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tad Seifert
Keyword(s):  
Primary Headache ◽  
Headache Disorder ◽  
Epidemiological Data ◽  
Return To Play ◽  
Secondary Headache ◽  
Headache Disorders ◽  
Unique Challenge ◽  
Primary Headache Disorder ◽  
Primary Headache Disorders ◽  
Headache Type

The prevalence of primary headache disorders in the general population provides a unique challenge in the evaluation of headache occurring in the context of sport. Sport-related and exercise-related headaches are not uncommon, but there is limited epidemiological data on these types of headaches in athletes. Any primary headache type can occur in the setting of sports. These scenarios are challenging in the return to play context, as it is often unclear whether an athlete has an exacerbation of a primary headache disorder, new onset headache unrelated to trauma, or has suffered a genuine concussive injury. Through careful evaluation, the practitioner can distinguish primary headache disorders from posttraumatic headaches following concussion. This chapter reviews primary headache disorders, posttraumatic headaches, and other secondary headache disorders.

scholarly journals Failure to identify underlying autoimmunity and primary headache disorder might be the reasons for refractoriness of trochlear headaches

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 251581632095177
Author(s):  
Pawan Ojha ◽  
Vikram Aglave ◽  
Suranjana Basak ◽  
Jayendra Yadav
Keyword(s):  
Primary Headache ◽  
Headache Disorder ◽  
Tension Type Headache ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Primary Headaches ◽  
Primary Headache Disorder ◽  
Local Injections ◽  
Poor Outcomes ◽  
Type Headache ◽  
A Minor

Introduction: A better understanding of etiology might improve poor outcomes of trochlear headaches (TRHs). Aims: To study clinical spectrum, etiology, and therapeutic response of TRH. Methods: Fifty-three TRH patients seen in a single center between 2015 and 2020 were included, excluding Trigeminal Autonomic Cephalalgia (TAC). Results: Mean age was 36.45 years (range 11–85 years), with 77.35% being females. Twenty-five patients had continuous trochlear headache (CTRH) and 28 episodic trochlear headache (ETRH). Tension-type headache (TTH) occurred in 9 ETRH patients and 24 of 25 CTRH patients, and migraine-like headaches occurred in 19 ETRH patients and 8 CTRH (trochlear migraine) patients. Prior history of headaches was noted in 22 of 28 ETRH and 11 of 25 CTRH patients. Twenty-eight responded to migraine/TTH prophylaxis, 25 being nonresponders (partial/no response). Fourteen of 25 nonresponders, 4 of 28 responders (4 of 4 secondary and 5 of 9 idiopathic trochleitis (IT), 3 of 9 primary TRH (PTRH), and 6 of 28 ETRH) had autoantibodies, that is, 11 antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) and 7 antithyroid antibodies. Ten of 14 (71.42%) antibody-positive nonresponders improved with immunosuppressants including steroids/hydroxychloroquine and only 11 required local injections. Finally, 38 patients had good response, 13 partial, and 2 no response. The etiology and refractoriness of IT can be attributed to underlying autoimmunity and a minor contribution by primary headaches, vice versa being the case for PTRH and ETRH. Refractory TRHs should be evaluated for underlying autoimmunity and primary headaches. Conclusion: Identification and treatment of underlying autoimmunity and primary headaches can help improve outcome of TRH.

Modular Headache Theory

Cephalalgia ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 842-849 ◽  
Author(s):  
WB Young ◽  
MFP Peres ◽  
TD Rozen
Keyword(s):  
Primary Headache ◽  
Headache Disorder ◽  
Secondary Headache ◽  
Primary Headache Disorder ◽  
Headache Patients

Many people experience headaches that do not fulfil the International Headache Society's criteria for a specific headache disorder yet behave biologically like that disorder. Others fulfil criteria for one headache disorder and yet have features of another disorder. To explain these observations, we propose that groups of neurones called modules become activated to produce each symptom of a primary headache disorder, and that each module is linked to other modules that together produce an individual's headache. This theory has implications for the classification, research and treatment of primary and secondary headache patients.

Secondary headache attributed to exposure to or overuse of a substance

Cephalalgia ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 033310242094223
Author(s):  
Kati Toom ◽  
Mark Braschinsky ◽  
Mark Obermann ◽  
Zara Katsarava
Keyword(s):  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Medication Overuse ◽  
Medication Overuse Headache ◽  
Primary Headache ◽  
Headache Disorder ◽  
Tension Type Headache ◽  
Secondary Headache ◽  
Primary Headache Disorder ◽  
Type Headache ◽  
Acute Headache

Background Secondary headaches attributed to exposure to or the overuse of a substance are classified under chapter eight in the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd edition. Three distinct sub-chapters consider: 1. Headache attributed to exposure to a substance, 2. Medication overuse headache, and 3. Headache attributed to substance withdrawal. Headache attributed to exposure to a substance refers to a headache with onset immediately or within hours after the exposure, while medication overuse headache is a headache occurring on 15 or more days per month that has developed as a consequence of regular usage of acute headache medication(s) for more than three consecutive months in a patient with a pre-existing primary headache disorder. The withdrawal of caffeine, oestrogen, and opioids is most often associated with the development of headache. Discussion Despite the current headache classification, there is no certainty of a causal relationship between the use of any substance and the development of headache. Some substances are likely to provoke headache in patients that suffer from a primary headache disorder like migraine, tension-type headache or cluster headache, while others were described to cause headache even in people that generally do not get headaches. Toxic agents, such as carbon monoxide (CO) are difficult to investigate systematically, while other substances such as nitric oxide (NO) were specifically used to induce headache experimentally. If a patient with an underlying primary headache disorder develops a headache, in temporal relation to exposure to a substance, which is significantly worse than the usual headache it is considered secondary. This is even more the case if the headache phenotype is different from the usually experienced headache characteristics. Medication overuse headache is a well-described, distinct disease entity with only marginally understood pathophysiology and associated psychological factors. Managing medication overuse headache patients includes education, detoxification, prophylactic treatments and treating comorbidities, which is reflected in available guidelines. Viewing medication overuse headache as a separate entity helps clinicians and researchers better recognise, treat and study the disorder. Conclusion Identification of substances that may cause or trigger secondary headache is important in order to educate patients and health care professionals about potential effects of these substances and prevent unnecessary suffering, as well as deterioration in quality of life. Treatment in case of medication overuse and other chronic headache should be decisive and effective.

scholarly journals Intractable SUNCT Cured After Resection of a Pituitary Microadenoma

2006 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 411-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Leroux ◽  
Todd J. Schwedt ◽  
David F. Black ◽  
David W. Dodick
Keyword(s):  
Primary Headache ◽  
Headache Disorder ◽  
Primary Headache Disorder ◽  
Pituitary Microadenoma ◽  
History Of ◽  
Ihs Criteria ◽  
Hypothalamic Pituitary Axis ◽  
Pituitary Lesion ◽  
Surgical Treatments

Background:SUNCT is a rare primary headache disorder that is associated with activation of the posterior hypothalamus and often poorly responsive to medication. Recently, a relationship between between pituitary microadenoma and SUNCT has been suggested, and reports of both amelioration and exacerbation by dopamine-agonists have been published. These findings suggest a functional role for the hypothalamic-pituitary axis in SUNCT.Methods:We report the long-term 4 year follow-up of a 35 year-old patient with a 14-year history of medically and surgically intractable SUNCT who experienced immediate and complete resolution of symptoms after resection of a 6 mm pituitary microadenoma.Results:This patient was first seen at the age of 28 years with a 10-year history of attacks of right retro-orbital pain satisfying the IHS criteria for SUNCT. Many medical and surgical treatments were attempted without success. An MRI demonstrated a 6 mm microadenoma without compression of surrounding structures. A trial of bromocriptine caused marked exacerbation of his pain. The patient underwent a trans-sphenoidal resection of the pituitary lesion. SUNCT attacks worsened for the first 24h post-operatively, then disappeared. He has been completely headache-free, without medication, for the past 43 months with the last follow-up being January 2006.Conclusion:This case emphasizes the relationship between pituitary microadenomas and SUNCT, supports the role of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis in the genesis of SUNCT, and illustrates the importance of careful imaging of the pituitary region in patients with SUNCT.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of paranasal air suction on acute migraine using portable air sucker – a randomized, double blind study

BMC Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. R. Bandara ◽  
S. Samita ◽  
A. M. Kiridana ◽  
H. M. M. T. B. Herath
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Sri Lanka ◽  
Primary Headache ◽  
Headache Disorder ◽  
Low Pressure ◽  
Outcome Variable ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Primary Headache Disorder ◽  
Before And After

Abstract Background Migraine is a primary headache disorder and is the most common disabling primary headache disorder that occurs in children and adolescents. A recent study showed that paranasal air suction can provide relief to migraine headache. However, in order to get the maximum benefit out of it, an easy to use effective air sucker should be available. Aiming to fulfil the above requirement, a randomized, double blind control clinical trial was conducted to investigate the efficacy of a recently developed low–pressure portable air sucker. Methods Eighty-six Sri Lankan school children of age 16–19 years with migraine were enrolled for the study. They were randomly allocated into two groups, and one group was subjected to six intermittent ten-second paranasal air suctions using the portable air sucker for 120 s. The other group was subjected to placebo air suction (no paranasal air suction). The effect of suction using portable air sucker was the primary objective but side of headache, type of headache, and gender were also studied as source variables. The primary response studied was severity of headache. In addition, left and right supraorbital tenderness, photophobia, phonophobia, numbness over the face and scalp, nausea and generalized tiredness/weakness of the body were studied. The measurements on all those variables were made before and after suction, and the statistical analysis was performed based on before and after differences. As a follow–up, patients were monitored for 24-h period. Results There was a significant reduction in the severity of headache pain (OR = 25.98, P < 0.0001), which was the primary outcome variable, and other migraine symptoms studied, tenderness (left) (OR = 289.69, P < 0.0001), tenderness (right) (OR > 267.17, P < 0.0001), photophobia (OR = 2115.6, P < 0.0001), phonophobia (OR > 12.62, P < 0.0001) nausea (OR > 515.59, P < 0.0001) and weakness (OR = 549.06, P < 0.0001) except for numbness (OR = 0.747, P = 0.67) in the treatment group compared to the control group 2 min after the suction. These symptoms did not recur within 24-h period and there were no significant side effects recorded during the 24-h observation period. Conclusion This pilot study showed that low–pressure portable air sucker is effective in paranasal air suction, and suction for 120 s using the sucker can provide an immediate relief which can last for more than 24-h period without any side effects. Trail registration Clinical Trial Government Identification Number – 1548/2016. Ethical Clearance Granted Institute – Medical Research Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka (No 38/2016). Sri Lanka Clinical Trial Registration No: SLCTR/2017/018. Date of registration = 29/ 06/2017. Approval Granting Organization to use the device in the clinical trial– National Medicines Regulatory Authority Sri Lanka (16 Jan 2018), The device won award at Geneva international inventers exhibition in 2016 and President award in 2018 in Sri Lanka. It is a patented device in Sri Lanka and patent number was SLKP/1/18295. All methods were carried out in accordance with CONSORT 2010 guidelines.

scholarly journals Diagnosis and management of migraine in ten steps

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna K. Eigenbrodt ◽  
Håkan Ashina ◽  
Sabrina Khan ◽  
Hans-Christoph Diener ◽  
Dimos D. Mitsikostas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Consensus Statement ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Primary Headache ◽  
Headache Disorder ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Diagnosis And Management ◽  
Primary Headache Disorder ◽  
Management Of Complications ◽  
European Headache Federation

AbstractMigraine is a disabling primary headache disorder that directly affects more than one billion people worldwide. Despite its widespread prevalence, migraine remains under-diagnosed and under-treated. To support clinical decision-making, we convened a European panel of experts to develop a ten-step approach to the diagnosis and management of migraine. Each step was established by expert consensus and supported by a review of current literature, and the Consensus Statement is endorsed by the European Headache Federation and the European Academy of Neurology. In this Consensus Statement, we introduce typical clinical features, diagnostic criteria and differential diagnoses of migraine. We then emphasize the value of patient centricity and patient education to ensure treatment adherence and satisfaction with care provision. Further, we outline best practices for acute and preventive treatment of migraine in various patient populations, including adults, children and adolescents, pregnant and breastfeeding women, and older people. In addition, we provide recommendations for evaluating treatment response and managing treatment failure. Lastly, we discuss the management of complications and comorbidities as well as the importance of planning long-term follow-up.

Posttraumatic Headache

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (06) ◽  
pp. 619-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brigid Dwyer
Keyword(s):  
Tension Headache ◽  
Primary Headache ◽  
Secondary Headache ◽  
Postconcussion Syndrome ◽  
Posttraumatic Headache ◽  
Posttraumatic Epilepsy ◽  
Primary Headache Disorders ◽  
History Of ◽  
Military Populations ◽  
Patients Experience

AbstractPosttraumatic headaches are among the most challenging complaints after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). They are a debilitating problem experienced by patients after TBI of all severities. Up to 90% of mild TBI patients experience headache, particularly if female and with a premorbid history of primary headache. Tension headache has classically been the most common subtype, but in military populations migraine has dominated. Posttraumatic headache encompasses a spectrum of headache types that overlap heavily with common primary headache disorders, but also autonomic cephalgias as well as several secondary headache conditions. It is important to understand the evolution of postconcussion syndrome as a concept, and the challenges associated with diagnosing and treating multidomain drivers effectively. The first-line treatments for posttraumatic headache are typically the same as those used in nontraumatic headache, with additional considerations for cognitive side effects, posttraumatic epilepsy, and coexisting injuries resulting in neuropathic pain or medication overuse.

scholarly journals Headache in Patients With Pituitary Lesions: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

Neurosurgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Rizzoli ◽  
Sherry Iuliano ◽  
Emma Weizenbaum ◽  
Edward Laws
Keyword(s):  
Primary Headache ◽  
Headache Disorder ◽  
Pituitary Surgery ◽  
Secondary Headache ◽  
Exact Nature ◽  
Questionnaire Response ◽  
Headache Diagnosis ◽  
Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery ◽  
The Relationship

Abstract BACKGROUND: Headache is a presenting feature in 37% to 70% of patients with pituitary tumor. Other pituitary lesions may also present with headache, and together these lesions account for about 20% of all primary brain lesions. Although pituitary lesions have been associated with headache, the exact nature of the relationship remains undefined. It is not always clear whether the presenting headache is an unrelated primary headache, a lesion-induced aggravation of a preexisting primary headache, or a separate secondary headache related to the lesion. OBJECTIVE: To characterize headache in patients referred to a multidisciplinary neuroendocrine clinic with suspected pituitary lesions and to assess changes in headache in those who underwent surgery. METHODS: We used a self-administered survey of headache characteristics completed by patients upon presentation and after any pituitary surgical procedure. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-three participants completed the preoperative questionnaire (response rate of 99%). The overall prevalence of headache was 63%. Compared to patients without headache, the group with headache was more likely to be female (P = .001), younger (P = .001), and to have had a prior headache diagnosis (P &lt; .001). Seventy-two percent of patients reported headache localized to the anterior region of the head. Fifty-one patients with headache underwent transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Headache was not associated with increased odds of having surgery (odds ratio, 0.90). At 3 months, 81% of surgically treated patients with headache who completed the postoperative questionnaire (21/26) reported improvement or resolution of headaches. No patient who completed the postoperative questionnaire (44/84) reported new or worsened headache. CONCLUSION: Frequent, disabling headaches are common in patients with pituitary lesions referred for neuroendocrine consultation, especially in younger females with a preexisting headache disorder. Surgery in this group was associated with headache improvement or resolution in the majority and was not found to cause or worsen headaches. Suggestions for revision of the International Classification of Headache Disorders diagnostic criteria pertaining to pituitary disorders are supported by these findings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document