Infection in the immunocompromised host

2020 ◽  
pp. 673-684
Author(s):  
Jon Cohen ◽  
Elham Khatamzas

The term ‘immunocompromised host’ embraces a group of overlapping conditions in which the ability to respond normally to an infective challenge is in some way impaired. This includes patients with underlying conditions such as protein–calorie malnutrition and diabetes, as well as organ transplant recipients, those with haematological malignancies and others receiving therapeutic immunosuppression, and patients with HIV infection. Many patients have multiple risk factors that increase the risk of opportunistic infection. A high level of awareness is essential for the management of patients who are immunocompromised; infections can progress very quickly, the early physical signs are often muted, and the microbiology can be confusing.

Author(s):  
J. Cohen

The term ‘immunocompromised host’ embraces a group of overlapping conditions in which the ability to respond normally to an infective challenge is in some way impaired. This includes patients with underlying conditions such as protein–calorie malnutrition and diabetes, as well as organ transplant recipients, those with haematological malignancies and others receiving therapeutic immunosuppression, and patients with HIV infection. Many patients have multiple risk factors that increase the risk of opportunistic infection....


2019 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Bianca C. Bondi ◽  
Tonny M. Banh ◽  
Jovanka Vasilevska-Ristovska ◽  
Aliya Szpindel ◽  
Rahul Chanchlani ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul K. Sue ◽  
Nora Pisanic ◽  
Christopher D. Heaney ◽  
Michael Forman ◽  
Alexandra Valsamakis ◽  
...  

Abstract Background.  Autochthonous hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection has been reported in over 200 solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients since 2006, yet little is known about the burden of HEV among SOT recipients in North America. We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional study to investigate the prevalence and risk factors associated with HEV infection among SOT recipients at our institution. Methods.  Children and adults (n = 311) who received allografts between 1988 and 2012 at the Johns Hopkins Hospital were assessed for evidence of HEV infection by testing posttransplantation serum samples for HEV antibody by enzyme immunoassay and HEV RNA by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Individuals with evidence of posttransplant HEV infection (presence of anti-HEV immunoglobulin [Ig]M antibody, anti-HEV IgG seroconversion, or HEV RNA) were compared with individuals without evidence of infection and assessed for risk factors associated with infection. Results.  Twelve individuals (4%) developed posttransplant HEV infection. Posttransplant HEV infection was associated with an increased risk for graft rejection (odds ratio, 14.2; P = .03). No individuals developed chronic infection. Conclusions.  Solid organ transplant recipients in the United States are at risk for posttransplant HEV infection. Further studies are needed to characterize environmental risk factors and the risk of HEV infection after SOT in North America.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 553-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
En Xian Sarah Low ◽  
Edhel Tripon ◽  
Kieron Lim ◽  
Poh Seng Tan ◽  
How Cheng Low ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (3pt1) ◽  
pp. 345-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tejaswi Mudigonda ◽  
Michelle M. Levender ◽  
Jenna L. O'Neill ◽  
Cameron E. West ◽  
Daniel J. Pearce ◽  
...  

Intervirology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 88-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanette Kluba ◽  
Silvia Linnenweber-Held ◽  
Albert Heim ◽  
Angella M. Ang ◽  
Lubna Raggub ◽  
...  

Objectives: Multiple novel human polyomaviruses (HPyVs) have been discovered in the last few years. These or other, unknown, nephrotropic HPyVs may potentially be shed in urine. Methods: To search for known and unknown HPyVs we investigated BKPyV-negative urine samples from 105 renal transplant recipients (RTR) by rolling circle amplification (RCA) analysis and quantitative JCPyV PCR. Clinical data was analysed to identify risk factors for urinary polyomavirus shedding. Results: In 10% (11/105) of the urine samples RCA with subsequent sequencing revealed JCPyV, but no other HPyV sequences. Using quantitative JCPyV PCR, 24% (25/105) of the samples tested positive. Overall sensitivities of RCA of 44% (11/25) in detecting JCPyV in JCPyV DNA-positive urine and 67% (10/15) for samples with JCPyV loads >10,000 copies/ml can be assumed. Despite frequent detectable urinary shedding of JCPyV in our cohort, this could not be correlated with clinical risk factors. Conclusion: Routine urinary JCPyV monitoring in BKPyV-negative RTR without suspected polyomavirus-associated nephropathy might be of limited diagnostic value. As RCA works in a sequence-independent manner, detection of novel and known polyomaviruses shed in sufficient quantities is feasible. High-level shedding of HPyVs other than BKPyV or JCPyV in the urine of RTR is unlikely to occur.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document