Classification of cardiomyopathies

Author(s):  
Eloisa Arbustini ◽  
Valentina Favalli ◽  
Alessandro Di Toro ◽  
Alessandra Serio ◽  
Jagat Narula

For over 50 years, the definition and classification of cardiomyopathies have remained anchored in the concept of ventricular dysfunction and myocardial structural remodelling due to unknown cause. The concept of idiopathic was first challenged in 2006, when the American Heart Association classification subordinated the phenotype to the aetiology. Cardiomyopathies were classified as genetic, acquired, and mixed. In 2008, the European Society of Cardiology proposed a phenotype-driven classification that separated familial (genetic) from non-familial (non-genetic) forms of cardiomyopathy. Both classifications led the way to a precise phenotypic and aetiological description of the disease and moved away from the previously held notion of idiopathic disease. In 2013, the World Heart Federation introduced a descriptive and flexible nosology—the MOGE(S) classification—describing the morphofunctional (M) phenotype of cardiomyopathy, the involvement of additional organs (O), the familial/genetic (G) origin, and the precise description of the (a)etiology including genetic mutation, if applicable (E); reporting of functional status such as American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association stage and New York Heart Association classification (S) was left optional. MOGE(S) is a bridge between the past and the future. It allows description of comprehensive phenotypic data, all genetic and non-genetic causes of cardiomyopathy, and incorporates description of familial clustering in a genetic disease. MOGE(S) is the instrument of precision diagnosis for cardiomyopathies. The addition of the early and unaffected phenotypes to the (M) descriptor outlines the clinical profile of an early affected family member; the examples include non-dilated hypokinetic cardiomyopathy in dilated cardiomyopathy and septal thickness (13–14 mm) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy classes.

ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 1432-1437
Author(s):  
Eloisa Arbustini ◽  
Valentina Favalli ◽  
Alessandro Di Toro ◽  
Alessandra Serio ◽  
Jagat Narula

For over 50 years, the definition and classification of cardiomyopathies have remained anchored in the concept of ventricular dysfunction and myocardial structural remodelling due to unknown cause. The concept of idiopathic was first challenged in 2006, when the American Heart Association classification subordinated the phenotype to the aetiology. Cardiomyopathies were classified as genetic, acquired, and mixed. In 2008, the European Society of Cardiology proposed a phenotype-driven classification that separated familial (genetic) from non-familial (non-genetic) forms of cardiomyopathy. Both classifications led the way to a precise phenotypic and aetiological description of the disease and moved away from the previously held notion of idiopathic disease. In 2013, the World Heart Federation introduced a descriptive and flexible nosology—the MOGE(S) classification—describing the morpho-functional (M) phenotype of cardiomyopathy, the involvement of additional organs (O), the familial/genetic (G) origin, and the precise description of the (a)etiology including genetic mutation, if applicable (E); reporting of functional status such as American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association stage and New York Heart Association classification (S) was left optional. MOGE(S) is a bridge between the past and the future. It allows description of comprehensive phenotypic data, all genetic and non-genetic causes of cardiomyopathy, and incorporates description of familial clustering in a genetic disease. MOGE(S) is the instrument of precision diagnosis for cardiomyopathies. The addition of the early and unaffected phenotypes to the (M) descriptor outlines the clinical profile of an early affected family member; the examples include non-dilated hypokinetic cardiomyopathy in dilated cardiomyopathy and septal thickness (13–14 mm) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy classes. Finally, in the recently released scientific statement of the American Heart Association on the classification and diagnosis of cardiomyopathy in children the consensus was to use a classification system based on a hierarchy incorporating the required elements of the MOGE(S) classification.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 124-130
Author(s):  
Karina Vilela dos Santos ◽  
Amanda de Oliveira Freire Barros ◽  
Helga Cecília Muniz de Souza ◽  
Patrícia Érika de Melo Marinho

Introdução: a doença renal crônica (DRC), associada ao sedentarismo, predispõe à mortalidade cardiovascular. Objetivo: avaliar o nível de atividade física e desempenho no teste ergométrico (TE) em adultos com DRC em tratamento conservador. Método: estudo transversal, com 14 participantes, avaliados conforme nível de atividade física (Questionário Internacional de Atividade Física) e desempenho no TE. Resultados: 78,6% dos participantes foram ativos, no TE, 64,3% superaram os valores previstos do equivalente metabólico (MET) e 85,7% obtiveram comportamento fisiológico normal da frequência cardíaca frente ao esforço. A classe funcional I da New York Heart Association predominou e 21,4% apresentaram aptidão física fraca e regular conforme a American Heart Association. Conclusão: a maioria dos participantes apresentaram bom nível de atividade física e bom desempenho no teste de esforço, no entanto uma pequena parcela apresentou fraco desempenho funcional e sedentarismo ainda nesses estágios da DRC. Testes de esforço máximo e/ou submáximo poderiam ser realizados nesses estágios como forma de rastrear o comprometimento da função cardiovascular, a qual constitui a principal causa de morte nessa população.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (02) ◽  
pp. 138-142
Author(s):  
Janine Pöss ◽  
Holger Thiele

ZusammenfassungBei 5–6% aller Patienten mit akutem Myokardinfarkt, die einer Koronarangiografie unterzogen werden, liegt ein Myokardinfarkt mit nicht obstruktiven Koronarien (myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries; MINOCA) vor. Eine angemessene Diagnostik ist erforderlich, um die zugrunde liegende Ursache zu identifizieren und eine spezifische Therapie einzuleiten. Im Jahr 2019 hat die American Heart Association (AHA) in einem Scientific Statement eine überarbeitete Definition für den Begriff MINOCA vorgestellt und diese in ein klinisch sinnvolles Gerüst mit diagnostischen und therapeutischen Algorithmen zum Management von Patienten mit MINOCA eingebettet . Die im August 2020 aktualisierte Leitlinie der European Society of Cardiology (ESC) zum akuten Koronarsyndrom ohne persistierende ST-Strecken-Hebungen (NSTE-ACS) widmet dem Thema MINOCA ein eigenes, neues Kapitel . Folgender Beitrag fasst die wesentlichen Aspekte zusammen und gibt einen Überblick über dieses Krankheitsbild.


Author(s):  
Jelena Pavlović ◽  
Philip Greenland ◽  
Oscar H. Franco ◽  
Maryam Kavousi ◽  
M. Kamran Ikram ◽  
...  

Background: Despite using identical evidence to support practice guidelines for lipid-lowering treatment in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD), it is unclear to what extent the 2018 American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Multisociety, 2016 US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), 2020 Department of Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense, 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society, and 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines differ in grading and assigning levels of evidence and classes of recommendations (LOE/class) at a population level. Methods: We included 7262 participants, aged 45 to 75 years, without history of CVD from the prospective population-based Rotterdam Study. Per guideline, proportions of the population recommended statin therapy by LOE/class, sensitivity and specificity for CVD events, and numbers needed to treat at 10 years were calculated. Results: Mean age was 61.1 (SD 6.9) years; 58.2% were women. American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Multisociety, USPSTF, Department of Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense, Canadian Cardiovascular Society, and European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society strongly recommended statin initiation in respective 59.4%, 40.2%, 45.2%, 73.7%, and 42.1% of the eligible population based on high-quality evidence. Sensitivity for CVD events for treatment recommendations supported with strong LOE/class was 86.3% for American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/Multisociety (IA or IB), 69.4% for USPSTF (USPSTF-B), 74.5% for Department of Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense (strong for), 93.3% for Canadian Cardiovascular Society (strong), and 66.6% for European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society (IA). Specificity was highest for the USPSTF at 45.3% and lowest for European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society at 10.0%. Estimated numbers needed to treat at 10 years for those with the strongest LOE/class were ranging from 20 to 26 for moderate-intensity and 12 to 16 for high-intensity statins. Conclusions: Sensitivity, specificity, and numbers needed to treat at 10 years for assigned LOE/class varied greatly among 5 CVD prevention guidelines. The level of variability seems to be driven by differences in how the evidence is graded and translated into LOE/class underlying the treatment recommendations by different professional societies. Efforts towards harmonizing evidence grading systems for clinical guidelines in primary prevention of CVD may reduce ambiguity and reinforce updated evidence-based recommendations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 1221-1231
Author(s):  
Deborah Carvalho Malta ◽  
Pedro Cisalpino Pinheiro ◽  
Renato Teixeira Azeredo ◽  
Filipe Malta Santos ◽  
Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro ◽  
...  

Resumo O estudo visa comparar a proporção de indivíduos classificados como portadores de alto risco cardiovascular (RCV) na população adulta brasileira, segundo seis diferentes calculadoras de risco, visando analisar a concordância entre as medidas. Estudo transversal, no qual foram utilizados dados laboratoriais da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde (PNS). As prevalências do RCV em 10 anos para a população entre 45 e 64 anos foram: Escore de risco global (ERG) da Sociedade Geral de Cardiologia (SBC):38,1%, “American College of Cardiology” e “American Heart Association” ACC/AHA, 44,1%, “Framingham Heart Study”/ERG 19,4%, SCORE da “European Society of Cardiology”, 14,6, Organização Mundial da Saúde/Sociedade Internacional de hipertensão (OMS/ISH) e Lim et al. As calculadoras de RCV apresentaram baixa concordância para identificar os indivíduos de alto risco e alta concordância dos de risco baixo/moderado, exceto pela ACC/AHA. O emprego de diferentes calculadoras resultou em diferentes populações elegíveis para iniciar a terapia farmacológica para prevenção cardiovascular, o que pode implicar em percepções de risco inadequadas, baixo custo efetividade desse tratamento e dificuldade de implementação de políticas públicas.


JAMA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 321 (11) ◽  
pp. 1069 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander C. Fanaroff ◽  
Robert M. Califf ◽  
Stephan Windecker ◽  
Sidney C. Smith ◽  
Renato D. Lopes

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document