Assessment of viability

Author(s):  
Luc A. Pierard ◽  
Paola Gargiulo ◽  
Pasquale Perrone-Filardi ◽  
Bernhard Gerber ◽  
Joseph B. Selvanayagam

Ischaemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction due to coronary artery disease (CAD) is steadily increasing as a consequence of the ageing of the population and of improved survival of patients with acute coronary syndromes and currently represents the first cause of heart failure (HF). Myocardial function is dependent on blood supply, as anaerobic reserve is minimum due to a nearly maximal arteriovenous oxygen extraction. At rest, myocardial blood flow remains normal even in the presence of severe coronary artery stenosis (up to 85% diameter stenosis) by coronary autoregulation. In the presence of transstenotic pressure gradient due to epicardial coronary stenosis, arteriolar dilatation maintains normal myocardial flow at rest but with a progressive reduction in flow reserve. When arteriolar dilatation is maximal, autoregulation is exhausted and myocardial ischaemia develops. The limit of autoregulation depends on myocardial oxygen demand and is influenced by heart rate. Tachycardia increases oxygen demand and supply is reduced because of a decreased diastolic perfusion time. In the presence of acute ischaemia, there is a close relation between subendocardial perfusion and transmural function. Indeed, the contribution of subendocardium to myocardial thickening largely exceeds the contribution of the subepicardium. Akinesia can therefore result from subendocardial ischaemia and transmural ischaemia is not necessary. This chapter looks at how viability of the different techniques for treating myocardial dysfunction is assessed.

2019 ◽  
pp. 28-33
Author(s):  
E. V. Filippov ◽  
K. A. Moseychuk

Coronary artery disease (CAD) can manifest as a classic chest pain, or atypical angina. At the same time, the prevalence of CAD in a group of male patients with atypical angina over the age of 60 can reach 59--78%. It should be noted that the clinic manifestation of the chronic heart failure (CHF), which will be the main limiting factor, may take centre stage in diffuse coronary artery atherosclerosis. In patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure, who take atorvastatin, one should expect a decrease in the risk of adverse outcomes and hospitalizations due to heart failure. However, this does not negate the need for treatment and optimization of heart failure, if necessary. The therapy of these patients is based on the administration of high doses of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors), beta-blockers (BB) and statins. The routine use of statins in heart failure with low ejection fraction (EF) is not recommended for the management of patients with heart failure from clinical guidelines point of view. This conclusion is based on two multicenter randomized clinical trials that have purposefully studied the use of statins in heart failure (CORONA and GISSI-HF). However, this document recommends the use of statins to prevent heart failure in patients with coronary artery disease. Continuing statin therapy in patients, who are already receiving these drugs for coronary artery disease or hyperlipidemia, should also be discussed. Thus, the use of atorvastatin in patients with coronary artery disease and systolic left ventricular myocardial dysfunction can reduce the risk of adverse outcomes and hospitalizations due to heart failure. In patients with non-ischemic heart failure, taking statins is not associated with improved survival. Thus, the decision to prescribe this group of drugs in patients with chronic heart failure should take into account the specific clinical situation and be strictly individualized.


Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (17) ◽  
pp. 2128
Author(s):  
Xinyang Ge ◽  
Sergey Simakov ◽  
Youjun Liu ◽  
Fuyou Liang

(1) Background: Arrhythmia, which is an umbrella term for various types of abnormal rhythms of heartbeat, has a high prevalence in both the general population and patients with coronary artery disease. So far, it remains unclear how different types of arrhythmia would affect myocardial perfusion and the risk/severity of myocardial ischemia. (2) Methods: A computational model of the coronary circulation coupled to the global cardiovascular system was employed to quantify the impacts of arrhythmia and its combination with coronary artery disease on myocardial perfusion. Furthermore, a myocardial supply–demand balance index (MSDBx) was proposed to quantitatively evaluate the severity of myocardial ischemia under various arrhythmic conditions. (3) Results: Tachycardia and severe irregularity of heart rates (HRs) depressed myocardial perfusion and increased the risk of subendocardial ischemia (evaluated by MSDBx), whereas lowering HR improved myocardial perfusion. The presence of a moderate to severe coronary artery stenosis considerably augmented the sensitivity of MSDBx to arrhythmia. Further data analyses revealed that arrhythmia induced myocardial ischemia mainly via reducing the amount of coronary artery blood flow in each individual cardiac cycle rather than increasing the metabolic demand of the myocardium (measured by the left ventricular pressure-volume area). (4) Conclusions: Both tachycardia and irregular heartbeat tend to increase the risk of myocardial ischemia, especially in the subendocardium, and the effects can be further enhanced by concomitant existence of coronary artery disease. In contrast, properly lowering HR using drugs like β-blockers may improve myocardial perfusion, thereby preventing or relieving myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease.


Author(s):  
Mario A Castillo-Sang ◽  
Sunil M. Prasad ◽  
Jasvindar Singh ◽  
Gregory A. Ewald ◽  
Scott C. Silvestry

We describe the use of an Impella 5.0 for mechanical support in acute cardiogenic shock after an acute myocardial infarction. A 61-year-old man with a history of severe coronary artery disease who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with ischemic cardiomyopathy presented with cardiogenic shock after an ST-elevation myocardial infarction. An Impella Recover LP 5.0 (Abiomed, Danvers, MA USA) was inserted via a right axillary side graft, using transesophageal echocardiographic and fluoroscopic guidance. The patient remained in the intensive care unit, where he required a tracheostomy to beweaned off the ventilator. He required renal replacement therapy with subsequent complete recovery. His Impella support was weaned, and on postoperative day 35, the device was removed. The patient developed axillary thrombosis the morning after removal, requiring thrombectomy. Discharge echocardiogram showed mild left ventricular enlargement with global hypokinesis and left ventricular ejection fraction of 25%. The Impella 5.0 device can safely and effectively be used in the long-term support of cardiogenic shock.


Circulation ◽  
1970 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 605-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHARLES E. RACKLEY ◽  
H. DAVIS DEAR ◽  
WILLIAM A. BAXLEY ◽  
WILLIAM B. JONES ◽  
HAROLD T. DODGE

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document