Rapid response teams for the critically ill

Author(s):  
Ken Hillman ◽  
Jack Chen

There is a high incidence of potentially preventable deaths and serious adverse events in acute hospitals. Most of these events occur on the general wards of the hospital. The concept of rapid response systems was developed as a way of identifying seriously-ill and at-risk patients in acute hospitals at an early stage in order to improve outcomes. The system has two major components—criteria to define the deteriorating patient linked to a rapid response. The criteria are based on a combination of abnormal vital signs and observations, and the response is based on matching the patient with staff with the appropriate skills. Implementing and evaluating hospital-wide systems present new challenges that are different to our approach to a new drug or procedure. As well as agreeing to the appropriate criteria and response, the system needs leadership and support across the whole hospital, including education programmes and, monitoring with appropriate quality assurance activities. Increasingly, the specialty of intensive care is designed around the needs of the seriously ill, rather than being geographically confined within the four walls of an intensive care unit. The concept of rapid response systems is part of that process.

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyung-Jun Kim ◽  
Kyeongman Jeon ◽  
Byung Ju Kang ◽  
Jong-Joon Ahn ◽  
Sang-Bum Hong ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Rapid response systems (RRSs) improve patients’ safety, but the role of dedicated doctors within these systems remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate patient survival rates and differences in types of interventions performed depending on the presence of dedicated doctors in the RRS. Methods Patients managed by the RRSs of 9 centers in South Korea from January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2017, were included retrospectively. We used propensity score-matched analysis to balance patients according to the presence of dedicated doctors in the RRS. The primary outcome was in-hospital survival. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of interventions performed. A sensitivity analysis was performed with the subgroup of patients diagnosed with sepsis or septic shock. Results After propensity score matching, 2981 patients were included per group according to the presence of dedicated doctors in the RRS. The presence of the dedicated doctors was not associated with patients’ overall likelihood of survival (hazard ratio for death 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93‒1.20). Interventions, such as arterial line insertion (odds ratio [OR] 25.33, 95% CI 15.12‒42.44) and kidney replacement therapy (OR 10.77, 95% CI 6.10‒19.01), were more commonly performed for patients detected using RRS with dedicated doctors. The presence of dedicated doctors in the RRS was associated with better survival of patients with sepsis or septic shock (hazard ratio for death 0.62, 95% CI 0.39‒0.98) and lower intensive care unit admission rates (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.37‒0.75). Conclusions The presence of dedicated doctors within the RRS was not associated with better survival in the overall population but with better survival and lower intensive care unit admission rates for patients with sepsis or septic shock.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 325-331
Author(s):  
Taiki Haga ◽  
Hiroshi Kurosawa ◽  
Junji Maruyama ◽  
Katsuko Sakamoto ◽  
Ryo Ikebe ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The use of pediatric rapid response systems (RRSs) to improve the safety of hospitalized children has spread in various western countries including the United States and the United Kingdom. We aimed to determine the prevalence and characteristics of pediatric RRSs and barriers to use in Japan, where epidemiological information is limited. Design A cross-sectional online survey. Setting All 34 hospitals in Japan with pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in 2019. Participants One PICU physician per hospital responded to the questionnaire as a delegate. Main outcome measures Prevalence of pediatric RRSs in Japan and barriers to their use. Results The survey response rate was 100%. Pediatric RRSs had been introduced in 14 (41.2%) institutions, and response teams comprised a median of 6 core members. Most response teams employed no full-time members and largely comprised members from multiple disciplines and departments who served in addition to their main duties. Of 20 institutions without pediatric RRSs, 11 (55%) hoped to introduce them, 14 (70%) had insufficient knowledge concerning them and 11 (55%) considered that their introduction might be difficult. The main barrier to adopting RRSs was a perceived personnel and/or funding shortage. There was no significant difference in hospital beds (mean, 472 vs. 524, P = 0.86) and PICU beds (mean, 10 vs. 8, P = 0.34) between institutions with/without pediatric RRSs. Conclusions Fewer than half of Japanese institutions with PICUs had pediatric RRSs. Operating methods for and obstructions to RRSs were diverse. Our findings may help to popularize pediatric RRSs.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emi Cauchois ◽  
Jérémy Bourenne ◽  
Audrey Le Saux ◽  
Fouad Bouzana ◽  
Antoine Tilmont ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Rapid Response Systems (RRS) are now commonly implemented throughout hospital health systems to manage in-hospital emergencies (IHE). There is limited data on characteristics and outcomes of such patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). The goal was to determine whether the hospital mortality of ICU patients was different depending on their admission pathway: in-hospital via rapid response teams (RRT), or out-of-hospital emergencies (OHE) via prehospital emergency medical systems. Results: Out of 422 ICU admissions (Timone University Hospital ICU), 241 patients were retrospectively (2019-2020) included: 74 IHE versus 167 OHE. In-hospital mortality rates did not differ between both cohorts (n = 31(42%) vs. 63(39%) respectively, NS). IHE patients were older and had more comorbidities (immunosuppression and ongoing malignancy). OHE patients had more severe organ failures at presentation with more frequent mechanical ventilation support. Independent global hospital mortality risk factors were ongoing malignancy (OR = 10.4 [2.7-40], p < 0.001), SAPS II (OR = 1.05 [1.03-1.08], p < 0.0001) and SOFA scores (OR = 1.14 [1.01-1.3], p < 0.05), hemorrhagic stroke as admission diagnosis (OR = 8.4 [2.7-26], p < 0.001), and arterial lactate on arrival (OR = 1.11 [1.03-1.2], p < 0.01). Conclusion: This study provides a thorough and comprehensive analysis of characteristics and outcomes of ICU admissions following a mature rapid response activation system, compared to the “conventional” out-of-hospital admission pathway. Despite the more vulnerable background of IHE patients, hospital mortality does not differ, supporting the use of early RRS to identify deteriorating ward patients. Take-home message: Hospital mortality does not differ between in-hospital emergencies admitted to intensive care unit and conventional out-of-hospital admissions, supporting the use of early rapid response systems and the importance of early intensive care unit admission.


2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan E. Gregory ◽  
Elizabeth H. Lazzara ◽  
Ashley M. Hughes ◽  
Lauren E. Benishek ◽  
Eduardo Salas

Author(s):  
S. Castaño Ávila ◽  
F. Fonseca San Miguel ◽  
J.A. Urturi Matos ◽  
M. Iturbe Rementería ◽  
C. Pérez Lejonagoitia ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (9) ◽  
pp. 2133-2134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. DeVita ◽  
Bradford Winters

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document