Indirect calorimetry in the ICU

Author(s):  
Joseph L. Nates ◽  
Sharla K. Tajchman

Critically-ill patients have unpredictable and dynamic metabolic demands that are difficult to predict and quantify. Combined with the high incidence of pre-existing or development of malnutrition in the ICU, these metabolic demands have deleterious effects on outcomes when patients are provided with inadequate or inappropriate nutrition support. Providing adequate nutritional support that meets these varying metabolic demands is a long-standing challenge in the intensive care unit (ICU). Indirect calorimetry (ICal) is a tool that allows ICU practitioners to accurately assess energy expenditure (EE) in critically-ill patients with unpredictable metabolic demands to optimize nutrition support. ICal provides clinicians with a patient’s measured EE (MEE), a quantification of cellular metabolism, and respiratory quotient (RQ), a reflection of which substrates are primarily being utilized for fuel. Study results help clinicians target optimal nutritional goals and prevent adverse effects associated with both under- and overfeeding patients. Recent studies have suggested avoiding caloric deficits and providing tight caloric control may improve morbidity and mortality outcomes in critically-ill patients, though more studies are needed to verify this potential benefit. Currently, there are no specific guideline recommendations to help clinicians utilize ICal in the ICU. Although ICal is considered to be the gold standard for determining EE in critically-ill patients, its use remains limited by availability, cost, and the need for trained personnel for correct use.

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 573-581
Author(s):  
Charles CH Lew ◽  
Chengsi Ong ◽  
Amartya Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Andrea Marshall ◽  
Yaseen M Arabi

Introduction: Number of recently published studies on nutritional support in the intensive care unit (ICU) have resulted in a paradigm shift of clinical practices. This review summarises the latest evidence in four main topics in the ICU, namely: (1) function of validated nutrition screening/assessment tools, (2) types and validity of body composition measurements, (3) optimal energy and protein goals, and (4) delivery methods. Methods: Recent studies that investigated the above aims were outlined and discussed. In addition, recent guidelines were also compared to highlight the similarities and differences in their approach to the nutrition support of critically ill patients. Results: Regardless of nutritional status and body composition, all patients with >48 hours of ICU stay are at nutrition risk and should receive individualised nutrition support. Although a recent trial did not demonstrate an advantage of indirect calorimetry over predictive equations, it was recommended that indirect calorimetry be used to set energy targets with better accuracy. Initiation of enteral nutrition (EN) within 24–48 hours was shown to be associated with improved clinical outcomes. The energy and protein goals should be achieved gradually over the first week of ICU stay. This practice should be protocolised and regularly audited as critically ill patients receive only part of their energy and protein goals. Conclusions: Metabolic demands of critically ill patients can be variable and nutrition support should be tailored to each patient. Given that many nutrition studies are on-going, we anticipate improvements in the individualisation of nutrition support in the near future. Key words: Critical care, Critical illness, Intensive care, Nutrition, Nutritional intake, Nutrition support


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanneke Pierre Franciscus Xaverius Moonen ◽  
Karin Josephina Hubertina Beckers ◽  
Arthur Raymond Hubert van Zanten

AbstractThe use of indirect calorimetry is strongly recommended to guide nutrition therapy in critically ill patients, preventing the detrimental effects of under- and overfeeding. However, the course of energy expenditure is complex, and clinical studies on indirect calorimetry during critical illness and convalescence are scarce. Energy expenditure is influenced by many individual and iatrogenic factors and different metabolic phases of critical illness and convalescence. In the first days, energy production from endogenous sources appears to be increased due to a catabolic state and is likely near-sufficient to meet energy requirements. Full nutrition support in this phase may lead to overfeeding as exogenous nutrition cannot abolish this endogenous energy production, and mitochondria are unable to process the excess substrate. However, energy expenditure is reported to increase hereafter and is still shown to be elevated 3 weeks after ICU admission, when endogenous energy production is reduced, and exogenous nutrition support is indispensable. Indirect calorimetry is the gold standard for bedside calculation of energy expenditure. However, the superiority of IC-guided nutritional therapy has not yet been unequivocally proven in clinical trials and many practical aspects and pitfalls should be taken into account when measuring energy expenditure in critically ill patients. Furthermore, the contribution of endogenously produced energy cannot be measured. Nevertheless, routine use of indirect calorimetry to aid personalized nutrition has strong potential to improve nutritional status and consequently, the long-term outcome of critically ill patients.


2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanit Wichansawakun ◽  
Liisa Meddings ◽  
Cathy Alberda ◽  
Sarah Robbins ◽  
Leah Gramlich

Nutrition support has been shown to have a positive impact on critically ill patients who meet their defined goals of nutrition therapy. However, inappropriate energy assessment can contribute to under- or overfeeding resulting in deleterious effects. Thus, assessment of energy expenditure in critically ill patients is crucial to prevent negative impacts from inappropriate feeding. Currently, the optimal energy requirement and appropriate energy assessment in these patients is controversial. Indirect calorimetry or predictive equations have been suggested to evaluate energy expenditure in critically ill patients. Indirect calorimetry is a gold standard for evaluating energy expenditure, but it is not always available and has some limitations. Many predictive equations, therefore, have been developed to predict energy expenditure in critically ill patients. However, these equations cannot be used generally in these patients since they were developed in a unique patient population. Many studies compared measured energy expenditure with predictive energy expenditure, but the data regarding accuracy is not robust. Therefore, clinicians should consider using these equations carefully based on the current supporting data. Indirect calorimetry is recommended for use in evaluating energy expenditure in critically ill patients if it is available.


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 628.e1-628.e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila C. Japur ◽  
Fernanda R.O. Penaforte ◽  
Paula G. Chiarello ◽  
Jacqueline P. Monteiro ◽  
Marta N.C.M. Vieira ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Lillelund Rousing ◽  
Mie Hviid Hahn-Pedersen ◽  
Steen Andreassen ◽  
Ulrike Pielmeier ◽  
Jean-Charles Preiser

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document