Ophthalmoplegia

Author(s):  
Aziz Shaibani

Ophthalmoplegia is usually chronic and therefore diplopia is not a feature. There is enough time for the brain to suppress one image. It is amazing how much impairment of eye movement has to occur before the patient becomes concerned or considers it as abnormal. Neglected myasthenia gravis may be confused with mitochondrial ophthalmoplegia or oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy or even congenital myasthenic syndrome. Central cause of ophthalmoplegia should be ruled out first by performing doll’s eye movement. Detailed family history looking in particular for ptosis, ophthalmoplegia, and dysphagia is diagnostically very useful. Non neurological causes of ophthalmoplegia such as severe exophthalmus, and retroorbital pathology should be considered.

Author(s):  
Aziz Shaibani

Ophthalmoplegia is usually chronic, and therefore diplopia is not a feature. There is enough time for the brain to suppress one image. It is amazing how much of impairment of eye movement has to occur before the patient becomes concerned or considers it as abnormal. Neglected myasthenia gravis (MG) may be confused with mitochondrial ophthalmoplegia or oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD) or even congenital myasthenic syndrome (CMS). Central causes of ophthalmoplegia should be ruled out first by performing doll’s eye movement. A number of cases of different types of ophthalmoplegia are presented, along with clinical and laboratory methods to differentiate them.


2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 575-581
Author(s):  
Seulki Bang ◽  
Sanghyu Nam ◽  
Jin San Lee ◽  
Sung-Hye Park ◽  
Min Seok Kang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Paulo José Lorenzoni ◽  
Renata Dal-Pra Ducci ◽  
Raquel Cristina Arndt ◽  
Nyvia Milicio Coblinski Hrysay ◽  
Otto Jesus Hernandez Fustes ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Background: Congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) have some phenotypic overlap with seronegative myasthenia gravis (SNMG). Objective: The aim of this single center study was to assess the minimum occurrence of CMS misdiagnosed as double SNMG in a Brazilian cohort. Methods: The genetic analysis of the most common mutations in CHRNE, RAPSN, and DOK7 genes was used as the main screening tool. Results: We performed genetic analysis in 22 patients with a previous diagnosis of ‘double’ SNMG. In this study, one CMS patient was confirmed due to the presence of compound heterozygous variants in the CHRNE gene (c.130insG/p.Cys210Phe). Conclusions: This study confirmed that CMS due to CHNRE mutations can be mistaken for SNMG. In addition, our study estimated the prevalence of misdiagnosed CMS to be 4.5% in ‘double’ SNMG patients of our center. Based on our findings, genetic screening could be helpful in the diagnostic workup of patients with ‘double’ SNMG in whom differential diagnosis is recommended.


Author(s):  
Christopher H. Hawkes ◽  
Kapil D. Sethi ◽  
Thomas R. Swift

This chapter deals with the main varieties of muscular dystrophy and their differential diagnosis, including dystrophia myotonica, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Becker muscular dystrophy, facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy, limb girdle muscular dystrophy, Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy and oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy. Diagnostic clues are given for the main neuromuscular junction disorders, including myasthenia gravis and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. Inflammatory and dysthyroid myopathies are evaluated. Also appraised are periodic paralysis, McArdle’s syndrome, mitochondrial, distal, and medication-induced myopathy. The characteristic features of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and its mimics are debated as well as various forms of bulbar palsy. Hereditary spastic paraplegia and its variants are also included in the chapter.


Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 94 (16) ◽  
pp. e1693-e1701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H.P. de Meel ◽  
Kevin R. Keene ◽  
Magdalena A. Wirth ◽  
Konrad P. Weber ◽  
Umesh A. Badrising ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo validate the repetitive ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (RoVEMP) test for diagnostic use in myasthenia gravis (MG) and to investigate its value in diagnostically challenging subgroups.MethodsThe RoVEMP test was performed in 92 patients with MG, 22 healthy controls, 33 patients with a neuromuscular disease other than MG (neuromuscular controls), 4 patients with Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, and 2 patients with congenital myasthenic syndrome.ResultsMean decrement was significantly higher in patients with MG (28.4% ± 32.2) than in healthy controls (3.2% ± 13.9; p < 0.001) or neuromuscular controls (3.8% ± 26.9; p < 0.001). With neuromuscular controls as reference, a cutoff of ≥14.3% resulted in a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 82%. The sensitivity of the RoVEMP test was 80% in ocular MG and 63% in generalized MG. The RoVEMP test was positive in 6 of 7 patients with seronegative MG (SNMG) with isolated ocular weakness. Of 10 patients with SNMG with negative repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) results, 73% had an abnormal RoVEMP test. The magnitude of decrement was correlated with the time since the last intake of pyridostigmine (B = 5.40; p = 0.019).ConclusionsThe RoVEMP test is a new neurophysiologic test that, in contrast to RNS and single-fiber EMG, is able to measure neuromuscular transmission of extraocular muscles, which are the most affected muscles in MG. Especially in diagnostically challenging patients with negative antibody tests, negative RNS results, and isolated ocular muscle weakness, the RoVEMP test has a clear added value in supporting the diagnosis of MG.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class III evidence that RoVEMP distinguishes MG from other neuromuscular diseases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document