scholarly journals Orthopedic Surgery and Flight Surgery: Income Differences Between the Navy Health Professions Scholarship Program and Civilian Orthopedic Surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 185 (11-12) ◽  
pp. e1913-e1918
Author(s):  
Eric Goodrich ◽  
Richard P Goodrich

Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study to analyze the financial impact of choosing a civilian or military orthopedic surgery career. It will examine the most common scenarios to become an orthopedic surgeon in the Navy Health Professions Scholarship Program to include becoming a flight surgeon. To the authors’ knowledge, there is no peer-reviewed literature that financially analyzes the most common scenarios for a Navy Health Professions Scholarship Program scholarship recipient to become an orthopedic surgeon. Materials and Methods Salaries for Navy orthopedic surgeons, residents, and flight surgeons were recorded using the 2020 Defense Finance and Accounting Service pay tables and Navy Fiscal Year 2019 Medical Corps Special Pay Guidance. The median income of civilian orthopedic surgeons was recorded using Salary.com. The present value (PV) and future value (FV) were calculated using the Consumer Price Index-U and average Department of Defense pay increases over the past 20 years. Six common scenarios were utilized to calculate the PV and FV of civilian compared to Navy orthopedic surgeons. Results The two highest earning net FVs among all Navy scenarios were those surgeons who kept their Navy tour to 5 years or less (flight surgeon tour/separate or civilian deferment/separate). The civilian throughout scenario had the highest net FV of $19,974,673 after retiring at the age of 65. Flight surgeon tour/separate and civilian deferment/separate scenarios only made $843,751 and $1,401,630 less respectively than a pure civilian career due to the tax shelter afforded by the military pay. All Navy retirement scenarios to include Navy throughout, civilian deferment/Navy throughout, flight surgeon tour/Navy throughout resulted in a net FV less than $17,700,000. Civilian residency/deferment and retiring in the Navy had the worst net FV among all scenarios. Conclusions It was found that the shorter tours in the Navy had a higher net FV than those who made the Navy a career in orthopedic surgery. Flight surgery is a rewarding operational experience with among the highest net FV among Navy scenarios and is only slightly less than the net FV of a pure civilian career. However, it can be more difficult to apply for civilian orthopedic surgery after serving a flight surgeon tour. Lastly, the net FV was very similar between a civilian orthopedic surgeon career and the shorter tours served in the Navy. Factors such as higher civilian income with associated loan repayment/signing bonuses makes the civilian orthopedic surgery route the best financial option. This study will help those medical students considering a military versus a civilian career in orthopedic surgery and aid in Department of Defense recruitment/retention.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camille Choufani ◽  
Olivier Barbier ◽  
Laurent Mathieu ◽  
Nicolas de L’Escalopier

ABSTRACT Introduction Each French military orthopedic surgeon is both an orthopedic surgeon and a trauma surgeon. Their mission is to support the armed forces in France and on deployment. The aim of this study was to describe the type of orthopedic surgery performed for the armed forces in France. Our hypothesis was that scheduled surgery was more common than trauma surgery. Methods We conducted a retrospective descriptive analysis of the surgical activity for military patients in the orthopedic surgery departments of the four French military platform hospitals. All surgical procedures performed during 2020 were collected. We divided the procedures into the following categories: heavy and light trauma, posttraumatic reconstruction surgery, sports surgery, degenerative surgery, and specialized surgery. Our primary endpoint was the number of procedures performed per category. Results A total of 827 individuals underwent surgery, 91 of whom (11%) were medical returnees from deployment. The surgeries performed for the remaining 736 soldiers present in metropolitan France (89%) consisted of 181 (24.6%) trauma procedures (of which 86.7% were light trauma) and 555 (75.4%) scheduled surgery procedures (of which 60.8% were sports surgery). Among the medical returnees, there were 71 traumatology procedures (78%, of which 87.3% were light traumatology) and 20 procedures corresponding to surgery usually carried out on a scheduled basis (22%, of which 95% were sports surgery). Conclusion Military orthopedic surgeons are not just traumatologists; their activity for the armed forces is varied and mainly consists of so-called programmed interventions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 417-420
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Markatos ◽  
Georgios Karaoglanis ◽  
Christos Damaskos ◽  
Nikolaos Garmpis ◽  
Gerasimos Tsourouflis ◽  
...  

The purpose of this article is to summarize the work and pioneering achievements in the field of orthopedic surgery of the German orthopedic surgeon Karl Ludloff. Ludloff had an impact in the diagnostics, physical examination, orthopedic imaging, and orthopedic surgical technique of his era. He was a pioneer in the surgical treatment of dysplastic hip, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and hallux valgus. His surgical technique for the correction of hallux valgus, initially stabilized with plaster of Paris, remained unpopular among other orthopedic surgeons for decades. In the 1990s, the advent and use of improved orthopedic materials for fixation attracted the interest of numerous orthopedic surgeons in the Ludloff osteotomy for its ability to correct the deformity in all 3 dimensions, its anatomic outcomes, and its low recurrence rate and patient satisfaction.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Hoang ◽  
Amit Parekh ◽  
Kevin Sagers ◽  
Trevor Call ◽  
Shain Howard ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND As patient access to consumer review websites, medical provider information available on the internet, as well as increasing direct consumer healthcare advertising, elective orthopedic surgery has become more patient and market-driven. OBJECTIVE Our goal is to determine the importance of physician ratings and review websites and the role these websites have in the decision to establish care with an orthopedic subspecialist. METHODS Cross-sectional study involving 5 multi-specialty orthopedic surgery groups. 328 patients who sought treatment by 6 different orthopedic surgeons were asked to anonymously answer a questionnaire consisting of 25 questions. We asked demographic information and asked patients to rate the importance of specific criteria regarding the selection of their orthopedic surgeon. RESULTS Across all ages, 79% of respondents selected it was very important that the surgeon is covered by their insurance. Out of pocket cost was very important to 66% and moderately important to 19% of the respondents. Only 39% of the respondents searched for information about the doctor on the internet. Recommendations from family or friends to the surgeon were moderately or very important to only 61%. The surgeon’s website was visited by 49% of respondents, followed by the website of the office or surgical group at 27%. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that insurance coverage, insurance network coverage, and out-of-pocket cost are very important in patient’s choice of their orthopedic surgeon. Television and print advertising played little to no role in choosing a surgeon for the majority of patients surveyed. Patients' rising role in health care provider selection makes understanding elements that affect their decision imperative. CLINICALTRIAL N/A


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document