Effects of Intermediate-Tinted Lenses on Pistol Marksmanship and Visual Performance

ABSTRACT Introduction The standard issue clear or sun Military Combat Eye Protection (MCEP) is often inadequate in visually challenging training or combat environment. Intermediate-tinted lenses may offer a viable option for warfighters operating in dynamic visual conditions such as moving rapidly from bright sunny areas to darker building interiors in combat. Because the use of intermediate-tinted lenses has been delayed as a result of a potential negative impact on vision performance such as color perception, this investigation evaluated several commercially available intermediate-tinted lenses for operation performance during a U.S. military field training. Test lenses complied with all the requirements of the current MCEP except for the visible light transmittance (VLT) values that ranged between 32 and 62%. Materials and Methods Study subjects consisted of 22 service members who attended a military Close Combat and Marksmanship training course in May 2019. Visual and pistol marksmanship performance of three intermediate-tinted lenses (Eye Safety Systems [ESS] Copper [32% VLT], Oakley Prizm TR45 [44% VLT], and ESS Bronze [62% VLT]) was compared to that of a standard issue MCEP, ESS Clear (90% VLT). Quick contrast sensitivity function test was used to assess quality vision (AULCSF, area under a log contrast sensitivity function) and visual acuity (CSF Acuity). Color vision was assessed by Cone Contrast Test. Pistol marksmanship (Bill Drill) was used for performance testing. A pre-survey inquired about MCEP use, and a MCEP survey during the pistol marksmanship testing inquired about lens performance and ranking. Results AULCSF and CSF Acuity were significantly affected by the lenses (general linear model, repeated measures, P < .05). Bonferroni post hoc test showed a significant reduction of binocular AULCSF from ESS Clear to Oakley Prizm TR45 (P = .003) and ESS Copper (P < .001) and a significant reduction in binocular CSF Acuity from ESS Clear to ESS Copper (P = .001). Color vision and pistol marksmanship performance were not significantly affected by wearing different lenses (P > .05). Subjectively, there were no statistically significant differences among study lenses in perceived “clarity of vision,” “ability to clearly identify the target,” or “overall performance” (Friedman test and Wilcoxon signed-rank post hoc test with Bonferroni adjustment, P > .017). Participants ranked Prizm TR45 (44% VLT) and ESS Bronze (62% VLT) lenses significantly more favorably than EES Clear (P = .001 and P = .009). Conclusions Quality of vision and visual acuity decreased with darker lenses; however, the study lenses had insignificant impacts on pistol marksmanship and subjective acceptance. Our surveys indicated that Intermediate-tinted lenses were operationally acceptable and preferred over a standard issue MCEP. While more evaluations for color vision deficient subjects are needed, overall results suggest that commercially available intermediate-tinted lenses may be a viable option to enhance protection and performance in a visually dynamic combat environment.