scholarly journals Relationship between locomotive syndrome and frailty in rheumatoid arthritis patients by locomotive syndrome stage

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasumori Sobue ◽  
Mochihito Suzuki ◽  
Yoshifumi Ohashi ◽  
Hiroshi Koshima ◽  
Nobuyuki Okui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Health Assessment Questionnaire ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Locomotive Syndrome ◽  
Physical Frailty ◽  
Assessment Questionnaire

ABSTRACT Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the association between locomotive syndrome (LS) and frailty in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Methods Subjects were 538 RA patients (female, 72.9%; mean age ± standard deviation, 66.8 ± 13.4 years). LS and frailty were defined as ≥16 points on the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (Stage ≥2) and ≥8 points on the Kihon Checklist (KCL), respectively. Results There were 214 subjects with Stage ≥2 LS (39.8%) and 213 subjects with frailty (39.6%). Among subjects with Stage 0, 1, 2, and 3 LS, 11.0%, 21.9%, 48.3%, and 84.6% had frailty, respectively. The KCL points for cognitive and psychosocial factors had no significant differences across LS stages. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the Health Assessment Questionnaire was independently associated with frailty and LS stage, and the Clinical Disease Activity Index was associated with LS stage but not frailty. Conclusions As LS worsens in RA patients, the likelihood of developing physical frailty increases. RA patients with a low LS stage can still develop frailty, and suppressing disease activity may not be sufficient to prevent frailty. These findings highlight the need to screen for frailty in RA patients and consider appropriate interventions based on each patient’s condition, focusing on nonphysical factors.

scholarly journals AB0271 EFFECTIVENESS OF DULOXETINE FOR RELIEF OF THE REMNANT PAIN OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENT WHOSE DISEASE ACTIVITY IS REMISSION

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1434.1-1434
Author(s):  
I. Yoshii
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Health Assessment Questionnaire ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Assessment Questionnaire

Background:Pain control in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patient is an important matter. When pain remains even disease activity is remission, it causes deterioration of activity in daily living (ADL) in past research. In other words, pain affects ADL independently from disease activity, namely the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score, a most popular index of ADL for patient with RA[1]. Thus, burden of remnant pain despite clinical remission in RA is serious and pending subject.Duloxetine, a potent reuptake inhibitor of serotonin and norepinephrine, is developed for the treatment of major depressive disorder [2]. It’s effectiveness for pain relief with osteoarthritis is also widely accepted. This drug should be effective not only for chronic pain due to osteoarthritis, but also due to RA. However, effectiveness of duloxetine for remnant pain relief in patient with RA in clinical remission is still unclear.Objectives:In this study, effectiveness of duloxetine for the remnant pain despite clinical remission in patient with RA was statistically evaluated.Methods:RA patients whose pain score with visual analog scale (PS-VAS) >30mm despite Clinical Disease Activity Score (CDAI) is <2.8, were picked up for the study. These patients were divided into groups whether duloxetine was administrated (a group without duloxetine: G-C; a group with duloxetine: G-D).PS-VAS, C-reactive protein, CDAI and simplified disease activity index (SDAI), modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (mHAQ), and QOL value which is calculated from Euro-QOL 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D) were measured at the initiation of duloxetine in the G-D and at the first CDAI remission attained in the G-C, and at week 12 thereafter. Change of these indices were compared with One sample T-test for each group. Patient’s global assessment (PGA) at baseline compared to the other components of CDAI was evaluated for each group statistically with One-tailed T-test. Differences between the two groups at each moment were statistically evaluated with Mann-Whitney U-test. Statistical significance was set less than 1%. All statistical analyses were performed using StatPlus:mac®(AnalystSoft Inc., Walnut, CA, USA).Results:A total of three hundred and six patients were recruited. G-D counted sixty-eight with 18 males and 50 females, while G-C counted 238 with 57 males and 181 females. Average age were 71.3 and 71.5 for G-D and G-C, respectively, with 53.6 months for time span from baseline to initiation in the G-D. 80.8% of the patients in G-D sustained to administrate duloxetine. PGA was 0.6 and 0.5 for G-D and G-C respectively, while the other component of CDAI were below 0.3 in average for both groups and these values were significantly lower than the PGA score in both groups. PS-VAS was 46.4 and 44.0, and significantly decreased to 26.1 and 36.0 in average for G-D and G-C respectively at week 12 when compared to baseline. Reversely, the CDAI score was significantly elevated significantly from 1.16 and 1.19 to 3.25 and 4.34 for G-D and G-C respectively. PGA also significantly increased to 1.5 and 2.4 for G-D and G-C respectively. CRP and the SDAI score also demonstrated same trend significantly as the CDAI score for both groups. mHAQ decreased significantly from 0.430 and 0.495 to 0.393 and 0.487 for G-D and G-C respectively. QOL value increased from 0.800 and 0.817 to 0.811 and 0.840 for G-D and G-C respectively, however no statistical significance demonstrated in both groups.Conclusion:Duloxetine has been suggested to have effectiveness for the pain relief, for improvement of ADL, and for the contribution to QOL maintenance, however, no effect of disease activity control is expected.References:[1]Yoshii I, Chijiwa T, Sawada N. Influence of pain score measured by a visual analog scale (PS-VAS) on the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index and 28-joint Disease Activity Index with C-reactive protein in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Int J Rheum Dis 2018;21:1955-61.[2]Knadler MP, Lobo E, Chappell J, Bergstrom R. Duloxetine. Clin Pharmacokinet 2011;50:281-94.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of a single switch from etanercept originator to etanercept biosimilar in a cohort of inflammatory arthritis

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Chiara Ditto ◽  
Simone Parisi ◽  
Marta Priora ◽  
Silvia Sanna ◽  
Clara Lisa Peroni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Inflammatory Arthritis ◽  
Health Assessment Questionnaire ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Clinical State ◽  
Assessment Questionnaire

Abstract AntiTNF-α biosimilars are broadly available for the treatment of inflammatory arthritis. There are a lot of data concerning the maintenance of clinical efficacy after switching from originators to biosimilars; therefore, such a transition is increasingly encouraged both in the US and Europe. However, there are reports about flares and adverse events (AE) as a non-medical switch remains controversial due to ethical and clinical implications (efficacy, safety, tolerability). The aim of our work was to evaluate the disease activity trend after switching from etanercept originator (oETA-Enbrel) to its biosimilar (bETA-SP4/Benepali) in a cohort of patients in Turin, Piedmont, Italy. In this area, the switch to biosimilars is stalwartly encouraged. We switched 87 patients who were in a clinical state of stability from oETA to bETA: 48 patients were affected by Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA),26 by Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) and 13 by Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS).We evaluated VAS-pain, Global-Health, CRP, number of swollen and tender joints, Disease Activity Score on 28 joints (DAS28) for RA, Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) for PsA, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Health Assessment Questionnaire for the spondyloarthropathies (HAQ-S),Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) for AS patients. 11/85 patients (12.6%) stopped treatment after switching to biosimilar etanercept. No difference was found between oETA and bETA in terms of efficacy. However, some arthritis flare and AE were reported. Our data regarding maintenance of efficacy and percentage of discontinuation were in line with the existing literature.

scholarly journals AB0140 A HIGH-CONFIDENCE DEFINITION OF THERAPEUTIC RESPONSE IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS USING A MONTE CARLO SIMULATION APPROACH

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1097.2-1098
Author(s):  
V. Strand ◽  
S. Cohen ◽  
L. Zhang ◽  
T. Mellors ◽  
A. Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Health Assessment Questionnaire ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
High Confidence ◽  
Response Status ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Fidelity Score ◽  
Assessment Questionnaire

Background:Therapy choice and therapy change depend on the ability to accurately assess patients’ disease activity. The clinical assessments used to evaluate treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis have inherent variability, normally considered as measurement error, intra-observer variability or within subject variability. Each contribute to variability in deriving response status as defined by composite measures such as the ACR or EULAR criteria, particularly when a one-time observed measurement lies near the boundary defining response or non-response. To select an optimal therapeutic strategy in the burgeoning age of precision medicine in rheumatology, achieve the lowest disease activity and maximize long-term health outcomes for each patient, improved treatment response definitions are needed.Objectives:Develop a high-confidence definition of treatment response and non-response in rheumatoid arthritis that exceeds the expected variability of subcomponents in the composite response criteria.Methods:A Monte Carlo simulation approach was used to assess ACR50 and EULAR response outcomes in 100 rheumatoid arthritis patients who had been treated for 6 months with a TNF inhibitor therapy. Monte Carlo simulations were run with 2000 iterations implemented with measurement variability derived for each clinical assessment: tender joint count, swollen joint count, Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI), patient pain assessment, patient global assessment, physician global assessment, serum C-reactive protein level (CRP) and disease activity score 28-joint count with CRP.1-3 Each iteration of the Monte Carlo simulation generated one outcome with a value of 0 or 1 indicating non-responder or responder, respectively.Results:A fidelity score, calculated separately for ACR50 and EULAR response, was defined as an aggregated score from 2000 iterations reported as a fraction that ranges from 0 to 1. The fidelity score depicted a spectrum of response covering strong non-responders, inconclusive statuses and strong responders. A fidelity score around 0.5 typified a response status with extreme variability and inconclusive clinical response to treatment. High-fidelity scores were defined as >0.7 or <0.3 for responders and non-responders, respectively, meaning that the simulated clinical response status label among all simulations agreed at least 70% of the time. High-confidence true responders were considered as those patients with high-fidelity outcomes in both ACR50 and EULAR outcomes.Conclusion:A definition of response to treatment should exceed the expected variability of the clinical assessments used in the composite measure of therapeutic response. By defining high-confidence responders and non-responders, the true impact of therapeutic efficacy can be determined, thus forging a path to development of better treatment options and advanced precision medicine tools in rheumatoid arthritis.References:[1]Cheung, P. P., Gossec, L., Mak, A. & March, L. Reliability of joint count assessment in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review. Semin Arthritis Rheum43, 721-729, doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2013.11.003 (2014).[2]Uhlig, T., Kvien, T. K. & Pincus, T. Test-retest reliability of disease activity core set measures and indices in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis68, 972-975, doi:10.1136/ard.2008.097345 (2009).[3]Maska, L., Anderson, J. & Michaud, K. Measures of functional status and quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ), Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ), Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ), Health Assessment Questionnaire II (HAQ-II), Improved Health Assessment Questionnaire (Improved HAQ), and Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life (RAQoL). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 63 Suppl 11, S4-13, doi:10.1002/acr.20620 (2011).Disclosure of Interests:Vibeke Strand Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Arena, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion, Galapagos, Genentech/Roche, Gilead, GSK, Ichnos, Inmedix, Janssen, Kiniksa, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Samsung, Sandoz, Sanofi, Setpoint, UCB, Stanley Cohen: None declared, Lixia Zhang Shareholder of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Employee of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Ted Mellors Shareholder of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Employee of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Alex Jones Shareholder of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Employee of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Johanna Withers Shareholder of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Employee of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Viatcheslav Akmaev Shareholder of: Scipher Medicine Corporation, Employee of: Scipher Medicine Corporation

scholarly journals THU0106 PREDICTORS OF FLARE IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS WITH LOW DISEASE ACTIVITY

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 267.1-267
Author(s):  
K. W. Moon
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Health Assessment Questionnaire ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Erythrocyte Sedimentation ◽  
Euroqol 5D ◽  
Assessment Questionnaire

Background:Low disease activity (LDA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are usually recognized as stable state. In according to most guidelines for RA, monotherapy of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DAMRD) was recommended for RA patents with LDA. But some of patients with LDA suffer from flare in their disease course. Until now, we don’t have enough data on factors that can predict flare in RA patients with LDA.Objectives:The aim of this study is to evaluate predictor of flare in RA patient with LDA from long-term (3 year) cohort data.Methods:Korean observational study network for arthritis (KORONA) registry is a nationwide Korean RA specific cohort registry that collecting data annually from 5,376 RA patients in 23 centers across South Korea. We include the data from 1, 801 RA patients with LDA (28 –joint disease activity score (DAS 28) < 3.2 at enrollment) who had consecutive data of DAS28 for 3 years. Flare was defined as an increase in DAS28 compared with baseline of >1.2 or >0.6 if concurrent DAS28 ≥3.2. Cox regression analysis was used to identify baseline predictors of flare.Results:Among 1,801 RA patients, 673 patients (37.4%) experienced flare in 3 years. When we compare the baseline characteristics of both flare and non-flare group, more women and more non-adherent patients for medication were observed in flare group. Flare group had longer disease duration, lower EuroQol 5D score, higher health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) score, and higher erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) than non-flare group at baseline. In multivariate analysis, physician’s VAS, HAQ score, ESR, and poor adherence for medication were significant predictors of flare (Table 1).Table 1.Multivariate analysis of prediction of flare with baseline variablesMeasureHazard ratio95% Confidence IntervalP-valueFemale1.1300.906-1.4090.280Age0.9960.988-1.0050.414Physician’s VAS1.0081.002-1.013<0.01Pain VAS1.0020.998-1.0060.34EQ5D0.9520.534-1.6960.87HAQ1.4071.109-1.786<0.01ESR1.0081.002-1.014<0.01Poor adherence1.2721.047-1.545<0.05VAS: Visual Analogue Scale; EQ5D: EuroQol 5D; HAQ: Health Assessment Questionnaire; ESR: Erythrocyte Sedimentation RateConclusion:RA patient who have risk factors for flare, even though their disease activity was low, require more proactive treatment.References:[1]Bechman K, Tweehuysen L, Garrood T, Scott DL, Cope AP, Galloway JB, et al. Flares in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Low Disease Activity: Predictability and Association with Worse Clinical Outcomes. J Rheumatol. 2018;45(11):1515-21.[2]Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL, Jr., Akl EA, Bannuru RR, Sullivan MC, et al. 2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(1):1-26.[3]Sung YK, Cho SK, Choi CB, Park SY, Shim J, Ahn JK, et al. Korean Observational Study Network for Arthritis (KORONA): establishment of a prospective multicenter cohort for rheumatoid arthritis in South Korea. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012;41(6):745-51.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document